Categories: Entertainment

John Lewis’s Two-Year Gadget Guarantee: How a Malfunctioned Device Challenges Consumer Trust


This webpage was generated automatically; to view the article in its original setting, you can click the link below:
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/jan/22/broken-gadget-puts-john-lewis-two-year-promise-on-electrical-to-the-test
and if you wish to have this article removed from our site, please reach out to us


A while back, the Guardian reported on John Lewis implementing a minimum two-year warranty on all its electronic items.

In February 2023, I purchased a £200 Therabody PowerDot muscle stimulator there for my partner to assist with health challenges. She has utilized it only sporadically. When it malfunctioned, I wasn’t worried as I was aware the retailer guarantees a two-year window on electrical devices.

However, when I inquired about receiving a refund, replacement, or repair, I was informed it only carried a one-year warranty. I verified the definition of an electrical appliance, and the Therabody muscle stimulator qualifies as one! I believe John Lewis should be held accountable for this.

RS, Hassocks

The John Lewis site prominently states “two-year warranty as standard … at no additional cost” on its electrical products page, yet the product description for this device under the “wellbeing technology” section declares that only a one-year warranty is provided.

I requested John Lewis to investigate this matter, and they clarified that this item is classified as “sports” instead of being part of their electrical range. They reached out to apologize for the misunderstanding and processed a refund. They also mentioned: “We’re reviewing our warranty language to ensure clarity for customers.”

Recently, I wrote about a reader who, due to new Brexit regulations, was facing difficulties sending books to Ireland. Several of you contacted me with similar experiences. HM from London conveyed:

I took my package, which had two shirts, to my local postal facility, where the employee completed the customs documentation. Two weeks later, it was sent back due to “insufficient customs details” (the clerk had noted “clothes” and value £0.01). I returned with the form filled out by myself this time, clearly stating the contents, weight, value, and marking it as a gift. It was sent back two more times before I used Royal Mail’s online customs form, which generates a code at the end. When I returned to the post office, the clerk was amazed; they hadn’t been informed about the codes! On my fourth attempt, the parcel successfully reached Ireland.

This webpage was generated automatically; to view the article in its original setting, you can click the link below:
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/jan/22/broken-gadget-puts-john-lewis-two-year-promise-on-electrical-to-the-test
and if you wish to have this article removed from our site, please reach out to us

fooshya

Share
Published by
fooshya

Recent Posts

Temple Ambler’s Ultimate Esports and Gaming Hub

This page was generated programmatically; to view the article in its initial location, please visit…

1 month ago

Exploring the Heartbeat of Innovation: Northwestern University Unveiled

This webpage was generated automatically, to view the article in its original setting you can…

1 month ago

“Prepare for the Ultimate Gameplay Revolution: ‘inZOI’ Set to Dethrone The Sims!”

This page was generated automatically; to view the article at its initial source, please follow…

1 month ago

“Leveling Up: Understanding Gaming Addiction Among Students”

This webpage was generated automatically; to read the article at its original site, you can…

1 month ago

“How a York Car Park Scam Unexpectedly Enrolled Me in a Gaming Subscription!”

This webpage was generated automatically; to view the article in its original setting, you can…

1 month ago

Turner Shines Bright: RMAC Swimmer of the Week Honors Awarded!

This page was generated automatically; to view the article in its original context, you can…

1 month ago