Dietary and life-style methods for endometrial most cancers prevention: Emerging proof and unanswered questions

This overview synthesizes rising proof on modifiable threat components for endometrial most cancers (EC)—the sixth most typical feminine malignancy globally—with rising incidence regardless of diagnostic advances. Obesity drives ~60% of preventable instances, positioning eating regimen and life-style as vital prevention targets. This work evaluates present proof, unresolved controversies, and pathways towards personalised prevention frameworks.

Introduction

EC incidence elevated 1.5% yearly post-2010, notably amongst premenopausal girls in developed nations. Obesity underlies 40–60% of preventable instances, establishing eating regimen and bodily exercise as pivotal modifiable components. The overview maps proof from 2014–2024 to make clear EC prevention mechanisms and deal with population-specific variability.

Dietary Patterns: Evidence and Controversies

• Mediterranean Diet: Associated with 13% EC threat discount (excessive fruit/vegetable/entire grain consumption; anti-inflammatory results), however efficacy varies by BMI, ethnicity, and socioeconomic standing.

• Ketogenic Diet (KD): Improves insulin sensitivity and weight administration (key for EC prevention) however dangers dietary imbalance and hepatic/renal toxicity.

• Diabetes Risk Reduction Diet (DRRD): High-fiber, low-sugar patterns cut back EC threat, although much less efficient in older, overweight, or non-white subgroups.

• Soy Isoflavones: Show twin results—protecting in Asian populations with excessive dietary consumption however probably dangerous in hormone-sensitive subgroups or most cancers survivors.
  Key Debate: Whether eating regimen impacts EC instantly or not directly by way of BMI mediation (e.g., BMI explains 84–93% of diet-EC associations in cohort research). Regional variations (e.g., Asia vs. West) necessitate population-specific pointers.

Lifestyle Factors Beyond Diet

• Physical Activity: 7.5–15 MET-hours/week reduces EC threat by bettering insulin sensitivity and lowering irritation. Sedentary habits will increase threat by 28–30%.

• Smoking: Paradoxically lowers EC threat (anti-estrogenic results) however elevates all-cause mortality.

• Alcohol: Low consumption could decrease threat in overweight/insulin-resistant girls; greater consumption exhibits impartial results.

• Psychological Stress: Depression/anxiousness correlate with poor prognosis, mediated by immune-endocrine disruption.

Hereditary (Lynch Syndrome [LS]) vs. Sporadic EC

Nutrient Debate: Reductionist vs. Holistic Approaches

• Reductionist View: Focuses on single vitamins:

  • Omega-3 fatty acids present conflicting outcomes (15–23% threat discount vs. 9% enhance with docosahexaenoic acid).

  • Selenium/vitamin C exhibit pro-/anti-tumor results contingent on dose and context.

• Holistic View: Emphasizes dietary patterns (e.g., Mediterranean/plant-based diets outperform remoted vitamins). Challenges embody advertising influences and cultural dietary preferences.
  Consensus: Hybrid strategy—prioritize whole-diet patterns, then refine with nutrient-specific insights.

The “Dose-Effect” Paradox in Interventions

• Low-intensity interventions (e.g., strolling) typically outperform high-intensity regimens as a consequence of higher adherence and metabolic sustainability.

• Obese girls require greater train depth (≥15 MET-hours/week) for vital EC threat discount.

• Self-reporting bias overestimates compliance; wearable units enhance knowledge accuracy.

Toward Personalized Prevention

• Metabolic Phenotyping: Targeting insulin resistance/irritation. Example: Omega-3 advantages are pronounced in chubby girls.

• Genetic Stratification: LS sufferers want distinct methods (e.g., aspirin prophylaxis over OCs).

• Barriers:

  • Limited multi-omics cohorts (genomics/metabolomics).

  • Lack of validated biomarkers (e.g., inflammatory markers like IL-6).

  • Cost-effective screening instruments for high-risk subgroups.

• Clinical Integration: Digital well being instruments, culturally tailor-made interventions, and multidisciplinary groups (dietitians/oncologists) allow possible, sustained prevention.

Limitations and Future Directions

• Evidence Gaps: Heterogeneous methodologies, BMI confounding, self-reporting biases, and understudied populations (racial/age/genetic subgroups).

• Priorities:

  • Large cohorts integrating genomics/life-style knowledge.

  • Culturally tailored interventions and digital well being integration (apps/wearables).

  • Policy assist for public schooling and inter-disciplinary collaboration.

Conclusions

Diet (Mediterranean/plant-based patterns) and life-style (exercise/sedentary discount) considerably decrease EC threat, however efficacy is modulated by BMI, genetics, and sociocultural components. Personalized prevention—stratified by metabolic phenotype, genetic threat (e.g., LS), and cultural context—is important. Future work should bridge research-practice gaps by means of multi-omics, digital monitoring, and tailor-made public well being methods.

 

Full textual content

 

The research was just lately revealed within the Oncology Advances.

Oncology Advances is devoted to bettering the prognosis and therapy of human malignancies, advancing the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying oncogenesis, and selling translation from bench to bedside of oncological sciences. The goal of Oncology Advances is to publish peer-reviewed, high-quality articles in all points of translational and medical research on human cancers, in addition to cutting-edge preclinical and medical analysis of novel most cancers therapies.

Follow us on X: @xiahepublishing

Follow us on LinkedIn: Xia & He Publishing Inc.

---

---

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! aren’t answerable for the accuracy of stories releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing establishments or for using any info by means of the EurekAlert system.