Supreme Court’s Rs 2.5 Lakh Crore GST Gaming Verdict

Thank you for studying this submit, do not forget to subscribe!

The Centre has requested the Supreme Court for yet another week to file submissions within the Rs 2.5 lakh crore GST dispute on on-line gaming, simply as the decision is awaited. Industry giants argue that video games of ability can’t be equated with “betting and gambling.”

New Delhi: The Government of India has as soon as once more requested the Supreme Court for extra time earlier than the ultimate judgment within the Goods and Services Tax (GST) case linked to on-line gaming. On Monday, authorities counsel Chandrashekara Bharathi requested the apex courtroom to permit yet another week to submit supplementary arguments.

Earlier, the Centre had already sought two weeks for submitting extra paperwork.

ALSO READ: BREAKING | BJP Govt’s Online Gaming Bill Becomes Law: Gets President’s Assent

This case is likely one of the greatest in India’s tax historical past, because it considerations whether or not GST ought to apply to on-line video games. The whole tax dispute is estimated at practically Rs 2.5 lakh crore, making it a high-stakes authorized battle involving gaming corporations, trade our bodies, and the central authorities.

The matter was heard intimately and on August 12, a two-judge bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan reserved its verdict after a number of days of steady hearings.

The petitions have been filed by main corporations within the sector, together with Gameskraft and Delta Corp, in addition to our bodies such because the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), the E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS).

ALSO READ: Breaking: Lok Sabha Passes Online Gaming Bill 2025 – Money Games Banned, E-Sports Officially Recognised

The authorities’s contemporary plea for additional time has come just some weeks after Parliament handed a brand new legislation banning the net actual cash gaming trade. Legal specialists say that this coverage change may have an effect on the ultimate written stance that the Centre plans to file earlier than the Supreme Court.

During the sooner marathon hearings, a number of prime legal professionals argued on behalf of the gaming trade. Senior counsels Arvind Datar, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Tarun Gulati, Balbir Singh, and C. Aryama Sundaram introduced their submissions in defence of on-line skill-based gaming.

They instructed the bench that such video games contain information, coaching, and technique, and subsequently can’t be handled the identical approach as “betting and gambling” underneath the Constitution.

To assist their level, they referred to well-known Supreme Court judgments within the RMDC case and the Okay.R. Lakshmanan case, each of which had drawn a transparent line between video games of ability and video games of probability.

The trade additionally objected to the Revenue Department’s transfer to deal with on-line rummy stakes as “actionable claims” underneath GST legislation. Lawyers argued that this interpretation had no authorized basis and went in opposition to established ideas of taxation.

ALSO READ: Breaking: Parliament Passes Online Gaming Bill 2025, Bans Money Games Amid Opposition Uproar

Further, the federal government had tried to make use of the idea of “House Advantage”, a technique usually utilized in on line casino taxation, to justify its place. However, the petitioners strongly rejected this strategy, saying it was solely a notional determine created with none actual calculation or benefit.

Read More Reports On Gaming

FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES

Related