This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6648326/2025/09/22/enzo-maresca-chelsea-substitutions/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
It has not been one of the best week for Chelsea head coach Enzo Maresca. Basic numbers will inform you that.
Fixtures towards Brentford, Bayern Munich and Manchester United have returned one draw and the primary two defeats of the marketing campaign. Seven objectives have been conceded.
It is in no way a catastrophe and a Carabao Cup tie at League One aspect Lincoln City on Tuesday supplies an early alternative to show across the unfavourable momentum.
But this was the primary check Maresca has confronted in his teaching profession relating to managing a squad by way of a Premier League-Champions League-Premier League schedule and the outcomes alone will say he didn’t move it.
However, there may be extra to scrutinise.
The Italian made huge choices in all three video games and the priority will probably be that he obtained lots of them mistaken.
Let’s begin with the 2-2 at Brentford. By making a triple substitution at half-time — Chelsea had been trailing 1-0 — and a fourth 11 minutes after the restart, Maresca made a public admission that he made errors along with his beginning XI. Though it may be seen as a optimistic, his intervention helped, with Chelsea posing far more of an attacking menace and coming inside minutes of profitable 2-1.
Three of these substitutes are key members of the primary XI in Cole Palmer, Reece James and Marc Cucurella. Afterwards, Maresca denied that leaving them out had something to do with him having a watch on the Champions League fixture towards Bayern Munich 4 days later.
Given that Palmer has had groin damage issues (extra of that later), you may maybe settle for that one. But to have Wesley Fofana, missing sharpness in his first begin for six months, and 19-year-old Jorrel Hato (making his first begin since becoming a member of from Ajax) play as a substitute of James and Cucurella?
Maresca claimed the plan was to provide Fofana 45 minutes and for Hato to not end the match. It didn’t actually add up. With Liam Delap unavailable as a result of a groin damage, Maresca additionally selected to not embrace the one different match striker, Marc Guiu — who was recalled from mortgage at Sunderland final month — on the bench. Again, quite odd, even when at 19 he’s barely uncooked.
Against Bayern, the issue was being reactive quite than proactive. Chelsea had been nonetheless within the recreation at 2-1 down but, 10 minutes after the interval, the house aspect had been on prime and a few of Maresca’s gamers had been starting to battle. Substitutes spent plenty of time warming up, but stayed on the sidelines. A couple of adjustments then may have injected spark. It would have additionally disrupted Bayern. But Andrey Santos and Alejandro Garnacho had been launched 5 minutes after Harry Kane prolonged Bayern’s lead. Too late.
The worst efficiency was saved until final, towards Manchester United on Saturday. Until Casemiro foolishly obtained himself despatched off within the thirty seventh minute to present Chelsea a approach again into the competition, it was as poor a exhibiting since Maresca took cost.
It was not Maresca’s fault that goalkeeper Robert Sanchez was dismissed within the fifth minute for a rash problem on Bryan Mbeumo. His response was questionable, although. One substitution needed to be made to ensure that back-up keeper Filip Jorgensen to return on and it made sense that Estevao Willian made approach, given how new he’s to the Premier League. But he took off the opposite winger, Pedro Neto, as nicely, bringing on Tosin Adarabioyo.
This left Chelsea with nobody with tempo to run in behind or present an out ball for the defence after they had been a person down. Maresca clearly had no crystal ball to know Casemiro can be despatched off, however Neto was additionally sorely missed when it was 10 v 10.
When requested by The Athletic concerning the considering behind it, Maresca replied: “The reason why we changed Pedro and Estevao was because they (Manchester United) attack with five players always, and we defend with the four. We can defend with the four when we are 11 vs 11, but 11 against 10, I think we need to defend all the width, so we decided to go with the back five.”
But there was one other factor that made the Neto selection odd. Soon afterwards, Palmer needed to go off as a result of groin damage he has struggled with in current weeks. This meant Chelsea set a Premier League first of creating three substitutions within the opening 21 minutes.
Maresca stated afterwards that Palmer was a doubt for the sport and had undergone a health check on the morning of the fixture. Clearly, leaving Palmer out or taking him off when Sanchez was dismissed is a large name due to his massively influential expertise. But given he needed to go away the fray anyway, it might have been the correct one. To make issues worse, Facundo Buonanotte, signed from Brighton on mortgage primarily to offer cowl for Palmer, was not within the matchday squad.
The remaining substitutions got here within the sixty fourth minute with Chelsea 2-0 down. Did he flip to the 2 wingers purchased this summer season for a mixed £88.5million ($119.3m) in Jamie Gittens and Alejandro Garnacho — the Argentine receiving intense abuse from United followers on his return to Old Trafford — or Guiu? No.
He despatched on defender Malo Gusto and academy graduate Tyrique George, who noticed a transfer to Fulham break down on deadline day.
Asked if the dangerous reception Garnacho was getting performed a component in what occurred, Maresca added: “No. I sent him to warm up and he was ready to go on, and then Wes (Fofana) asked for a change. So we decided to go with Malo.”
It needs to be identified that Chelsea completed the sport stronger. A header from Trevoh Chalobah with 10 minutes remaining gave hope of rescuing some extent.
This is simply the beginning of Maresca’s second season in cost. The approach his first completed means he has credit score within the financial institution. The gamers additionally need to take accountability. The aspect have scored the opening aim simply as soon as up to now and that got here after Josh King had a strike for Fulham controversially disallowed.
But Chelsea have received solely two of these opening six video games, and that’s removed from the beginning Maresca and this membership would have needed.
(Top picture: Alex Livesey/Getty Images)
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6648326/2025/09/22/enzo-maresca-chelsea-substitutions/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you'll…