Critics as soon as heralded the emergence of pictures because the demise of portray. Today, A.I. has sparked comparable anxieties and dire warnings that it’s going to in the end exchange human labor and inventiveness—and with them, the notion of “artistic genius.” Yet as with each know-how earlier than it, A.I. is, above all, a software—a medium that may amplify and lengthen human creativity, providing immediate entry to and resonance with the huge heritage of information and data that has formed collective consciousness for hundreds of years. Crucially, A.I. permits creators to simply draw from this immense reservoir of human expression to research, elaborate and even anticipate what may come subsequent.
At Heft Gallery in New York’s Lower East Side, a groundbreaking exhibition of latest works by world-renowned photographer Edward Burtynsky, in collaboration with generative A.I. artist Alkan Avcıoğlu, explores the artistic and speculative potential on the intersection of conventional pictures and rising synthetic intelligence instruments. “Hypertopographics” examines how these applied sciences increase image-making and chart new visions of what’s to return, and previous to the present’s opening, Observer spoke with each artists concerning the capability of each artwork and tech to anticipate humanity’s future.
Burtynsky, the Canadian photographer identified for his large-scale photographs documenting the affect of human business on the pure world, has constantly embraced technological shifts all through his decades-long profession. According to him, pictures has by no means been solely concerning the software—it’s about how we see, interpret and reply to the world.
His new works painting, with haunting readability, the dimensions and velocity of urbanization and industrialization whereas absolutely embracing the probabilities A.I. provides to push digital imagery past the boundaries of human notion. The outcomes are as dystopian as they’re visionary: stark, mesmerizing photographs that appear to foretell the way forward for our planet and the implications of unchecked improvement, revealing how humanity’s relentless enlargement has upended its fragile stability with nature.
Burtynsky sees A.I. not as a substitute for pictures however as an extension of it. His collaboration with generative artist Alkan Avcıoğlu is a continuation of the pursuit he has at all times undertaken: making the unseen seen. For over 40 years, he has photographed the marks we go away on the planet—mines, quarries, refineries, farmland and cities—to disclose the dimensions and complexity of our interventions within the pure world. “‘Hypertopographics’ continues that investigation, but now I’m working in a hybrid space where the real and the synthetic merge,” he explains.
Rethinking medium within the age of A.I.
Burtynsky insists A.I. won’t ever exchange the human photographer. Instead, he sees it as a technique to remodel and increase the medium. “The nuances of emotional intelligence, political, social, environmental awareness and lived experience—these are things a machine can’t truly possess, at least not yet,” he displays. He treats A.I. as an addition to the artist’s toolkit, not a substitute. “The challenge is to guide it toward a visual language that deepens our understanding of the world, not just adds to the noise.”
“A.I. mainly serves as a tool that expands an artist’s creative field rather than replacing the artist,” echoes Avcıoğlu, who describes himself as a polymath and self-identified outsider. His observe has lengthy explored the probabilities of A.I. post-photography to grapple with digital overload, hyper-consumption of photographs and the alienation they produce. Yet he, too, emphasizes that regardless of how subtle A.I. turns into, it is going to by no means exchange the human eye—nor will it render different mediums out of date. “Every new technology changes the language of art, but it never erases the human drive to see, interpret and intervene. What truly shifts is the relationship between author, medium and audience.”
For Burtynsky, A.I. is solely the newest step in a protracted chain of technological transformations. Analog pictures supplied a tactile, chemical relationship to the picture, certain to movie and the mechanics of the digital camera. Digital pictures freed the medium from these constraints, unlocking new vantage factors via drones, satellite tv for pc imaging and 3D mapping—increasing perceptions of scale and place. “Conceptually, the digital revolution meant we could construct an image from many sources, times and perspectives,” he says. Tools like Photoshop launched larger management, altering the very situations of what may very well be photographed. Digital stitching allowed him to construct murals and monumental works on a scale inconceivable within the analog period. He says his most important contribution to this collaboration lies in reworking the generated picture right into a bodily, large-format print that carries the load and realism of scale—refined via a long time of experimentation with new applied sciences.
By working with Avcıoğlu—who generates the photographs whereas Burtynsky acts as conceptual information, curator and printmaker—the undertaking merges photographic sensibility with A.I.’s capability to weave collectively views and scales. The outcomes hover between the true and the imagined, grounded but otherworldly, very like how reminiscence or creativeness function.
Throughout his profession, Burtynsky has approached pictures as an anthropological and sociological software. When the medium emerged within the mid-Nineteenth century, it was not instantly embraced as an artwork kind however acknowledged primarily as a scientific and ideological instrument. In its immediacy, {a photograph} provides greater than a file of a second—it has the facility to disclose extra profound truths concerning the world, notion itself and the human situation.
In right now’s fast-shifting, image-saturated, technologically mediated surroundings, Burtynsky believes these capacities are solely increasing. Photography now holds even larger potential as a automobile for witnessing and storytelling—however photographers share larger accountability, particularly as photographs turn out to be more and more fluid and malleable. “Photography’s role is more crucial than ever—it’s both our collective memory and cultural conscience,” he argues. “In a world overwhelmed by images, the challenge is to make work that cuts through and slows people down enough to actually look and think.” For Burtynsky, this implies creating images—or photographically knowledgeable works—that expose one thing important about our relationship to the planet and each other. “As technology evolves, the core responsibility remains the same: to bear witness, question and illuminate.”
When requested if A.I. ought to be thought of a brand new creative medium, Avcıoğlu’s reply is each sure and no. Like digital know-how, A.I. can, in some contexts, stand as a medium in its personal proper, whereas in others it features as a software inside established practices. “Digital art became its own medium, yet films shot with digital cameras are still films,” he displays. “Similarly, A.I. will create entirely new mediums and artistic languages, while also serving as a new tool and process within existing ones.”
Pushing the boundaries of the machine
Avcıoğlu’s course of exists past the usual text-to-image immediate mannequin. “My workflow is multilayered, and every piece goes through several stages of generation,” he says. The uncooked outputs typically start as summary expressionist types, with prompts at that stage bearing little resemblance to the ultimate consequence. “These are mainly prompts to create a kind of digital painting with heavy texture,” he clarifies. From there, he runs the abstractions via a number of rounds of image-to-image era, adopted by tile-based upscaling and A.I. enhancement, steadily sculpting them into their remaining photographic kind.
This methodology displays a key level of reference to Burtynsky. “We both care deeply about the image carrying the subtle aesthetic presence of abstract painting,” Avcıoğlu explains. “The difference is that he makes his photographs and compositions approach abstraction, while I begin from abstract images and gradually turn them into photographs.”
For each artists, the true breakthrough lies in working with the machine’s limits whereas intentionally breaking them. “Brian Eno once said that so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart,” Avcıoğlu notes. “I definitely intend to break them with my experimental multi-step process. For me, staying within the boundaries is commercial work, while breaking them is artistic work.”
The emergence of hyperreality
In this context, we should take into account the notion of “A.I. post-photography,” a time period Alkan Avcıoğlu makes use of to explain his observe, drawing on a theoretical framework that first emerged within the Eighties in response to the disaster of illustration in postmodern visible tradition. “Photography in its strictest sense requires a lens and light striking film or a sensor. My work is photographic in scale and visual concerns, but it is not photography in that traditional sense.” For him, A.I. post-photography indicators that departure.
The time period captures an expanded actuality past pictures’s standard position of crystallizing a gift second for the longer term. A.I. already allows connections throughout time—linking the current with previous and future—not via fictional manipulation however via hypothesis grounded within the huge archive of human-generated content material. In “Hypertopographics,” Burtynsky and Avcıoğlu merge scales and views that neither the human eye nor conventional digital camera techniques can obtain. This physique of labor extends Burtynsky’s lengthy engagement with the “New Topographics,” probing modern situations of overwhelming industrial scale, technological complexity and international interconnectedness. The result’s an unsettling meditation on hyperreality, revealing an more and more disorienting existential situation through which humanity’s international affect regularly outpaces our capacity to grasp it.
“This capacity to synthesize realities allows us to imagine futures, to depict systems and scales that are otherwise invisible,” Burtynsky says. “It is a way of imaging the future, because it reflects the conditions of excess, acceleration and disorientation that define our time more truthfully than traditional forms,” Avcıoğlu provides. The works within the present confront viewers with the sheer scope of humanity’s accelerating imprint on the earth—an affect too huge for a single standard {photograph} to seize. In a tradition oversaturated with photographs and stricken by collapsing consideration spans, this collaboration slows down notion.
The undertaking grows immediately from this philosophy and the modern situation of aesthetic notion formed by sensory overload. “We deliberately begin by overwhelming the viewer, confronting them with images so dense and disorienting that they cannot be consumed in a glance,” he explains. “In that state of cognitive overload, familiar ways of seeing begin to collapse.” In getting misplaced within the particulars, viewers query their assumptions and open themselves to new methods of perceiving the dimensions and trajectory of humanity’s affect on the planet.
For Avcıoğlu, this leads naturally to “hyperreality,” an idea that runs via all his work. It shouldn’t be solely central to his visible observe but in addition formed his current feature-length documentary Post Truth, conceived totally across the concept. “For me, hyperreality describes the collapse of the boundary between reality and its representation,” he explains. “As Baudrillard argued, in postmodern society, copies can become more real than the original. Similarly, synthetic A.I. images can be more real than the original representations of the world, because they can carry information that is not apparent in indexical reality.”
Photography has lengthy served to democratize visible entry via manufacturing, distribution and possession. The rise of the web and later social media accelerated this dramatically: right now, anybody can seize and share a compelling picture with an iPhone. In this context, a crucial query emerges: What nonetheless makes {a photograph} particular?
Intent and authorship in a post-digital world
“What makes a photograph unique today is less about the moment of capture and more about the intent, authorship and craft behind it,” Burtynsky solutions. In an period the place billions of photographs are made day-after-day, the importance of {a photograph} lies within the depth of imaginative and prescient it represents—the pondering and seeing that formed it. Uniqueness additionally comes from the thing itself, he provides. “A large-format, meticulously crafted print, like the kind I’ve been making my whole career, still carries a presence and permanence that a digital file on a screen cannot match.”
The generative strategy of A.I. produces huge numbers of photographs, elevating the query of what determines when a single one is “complete” or worthy of standing alone. For Avcıoğlu, there isn’t any fastened components. “It is always the set of ideas that an image carries,” he explains, echoing Burtynsky. “Everyone has cameras on their phone, but not everyone is Burtynsky. Everyone has a pencil, but not everyone is Shakespeare. Everyone can shoot a film, but not everyone is Hitchcock.” For him, focusing solely on course of or instruments misses the purpose—what issues is turning into a refined storyteller who can provide kind to concepts with mastery.
All the works in “Hypertopographics” are introduced as distinctive large-format, photographically knowledgeable prints, every paired with a tokenized digital art work functioning as a Certificate of Authenticity. New applied sciences, they argue, are strengthening how authorship will be verified and originality preserved. “Authentication has always been important in photography, and digital technologies give us new ways to secure that,” Burtynsky notes. “By pairing each physical work with a tokenized digital counterpart that serves as a certificate, we’re creating a verifiable, permanent record of authorship. This can be especially valuable in an era when digital images can be easily copied or altered. It’s about maintaining trust—between artist, collector and audience—and ensuring the integrity of the work is preserved for generations.”
At the identical time, working with A.I. creates a dialogue—a back-and-forth between human intelligence and what seems to be machine logic. This collaborative course of raises new questions on authorship, each theoretically and legally, inside the context of A.I.-generated photographs.
Yet Avcıoğlu resists the concept of calling it “machine logic,” arguing that what emerges from the system is basically the collective unconscious of humanity. “With tools like A.I., the role of the creator becomes more collaborative and collective, moving away from the individualistic model,” he says. Looking on the arc of Twentieth-century artwork, he provides, there has already been a protracted strategy of stripping artwork away from the craft, mastery and technical talent that dominated for hundreds of years. For him, what issues now’s conceptual imaginative and prescient. “An ego-centric view of the creator has shaped Western art culture, and I believe A.I. will accelerate the shift away from that. Being a curator of your own work is always important, but for me, the real weight of art lies in the concepts and the ideas.”
In that sense, Avcıoğlu asserts {that a} “great image” is rarely absolute. “It is always relational to other images, and it is always about the story it tells in relation to them. Culture often reinvents or subverts itself when saturated, so the definition of a compelling image is always a moving target.” Quoting Susan Sontag—who wrote that the digital camera makes everybody a vacationer in different individuals’s actuality, and finally in a single’s personal—Avcıoğlu provides, “Now, in an age where we are surrounded by cameras and A.I. images, even reality itself has become a tourist. We produce millions of images every day, but like a stranger to our world, we are no longer certain what reality even is. That is exactly why, more than ever, we need great storytellers.”
More Arts interviews