Strava blames Garmin brand coverage for lawsuit

Strava has now spoken up about what led it to sue Garmin, and it appears to have little to do with Segments or heatmaps. In a Reddit post, the corporate’s Chief Product Officer claims Garmin threatened to dam all machine syncing except Strava plastered its brand on each user-facing display.

To remind, Strava sued Garmin final week over two primary options, Segments and heatmaps. It claims Garmin copied its tech and broke a 2015 settlement between the 2 firms. The lawsuit asks for cash and a ban on Garmin promoting units with these options.

---

Logo guidelines and platform management

Matt Salazar posted on the r/Strava subreddit to elucidate the backstory. According to him, Garmin launched new branding pointers on July 1 that will pressure Strava to indicate the Garmin brand on each single exercise put up, picture, graph and sharing card derived from Garmin knowledge. The deadline for compliance is November 1. If Strava doesn’t agree, Garmin may lower off all API entry.

Strava says that is unacceptable. It sees the change as pressured promoting, not attribution, and believes it might degrade the consumer expertise. Salazar added that Garmin doesn’t apply this rule to third-party knowledge inside its personal ecosystem, like coronary heart price straps or energy meters. He framed the disagreement as a query of knowledge possession and consumer rights, saying that if somebody data an exercise on their machine, they need to be free to share it nevertheless they like, with out company logos baked in.

Essential studying: Top health trackers and well being devices

Strava claims it spent the previous 5 months attempting to resolve issues privately. It says it proposed a extra balanced attribution methodology, however Garmin rejected these choices. Instead, Garmin caught with its authentic calls for, prompting Strava to escalate the dispute.

---

Users aren’t shopping for it

The Reddit put up hasn’t precisely gone over nicely. Many customers replied with skepticism or outright frustration. Several identified the irony of Strava calling out Garmin for branding and knowledge entry, given its personal historical past of stripping again third-party integrations and turning its platform right into a subscription-heavy expertise.

Some mentioned they’d no difficulty with Garmin wanting attribution, and that machine logos don’t intervene with their expertise. Others famous that Strava already promotes gear partnerships and branded challenges, typically in additional intrusive methods than a easy machine brand.

One of the sharper replies summed up the backlash: “You already list what device someone used. No one cares if there’s a Garmin logo. This is about your monetisation, not our experience.” Another consumer accused Strava of retaliating with patent lawsuits after failing to get its manner, calling the transfer “insane.”

There’s additionally a broader belief difficulty. Some customers are nonetheless offended about earlier API shutdowns that eliminated integrations with some third-party companies. So when Strava now frames itself as a defender of “your data,” it’s being met with disbelief by long-time customers who really feel they’ve misplaced entry to options they valued.

Strava ended the put up by saying it desires to keep away from any disruption to syncing, and that it’s nonetheless actively attempting to forestall Garmin entry from being lower off. But with lawsuits filed, tempers flaring and customers venting, this feels much less like a negotiation and extra like the beginning of a deeper fracture between two health giants.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.