As NASA Goals For The Moon, An Growing old Space Station Faces An Unsure Future

When a rocket carrying the first module of the International Space Station blasted off from Kazakhstan in November of 1998, NASA officers mentioned the station would function an orbiting dwelling for astronauts and cosmonauts for at the least 15 years.

It has now been greater than 18 years that the station has been repeatedly occupied by folks. The place is spectacular, with extra residing house than a six-bedroom home and with two loos and a big bay window for trying down at Earth.

NASA and its worldwide companions have spent many years and greater than $100 billion to make the station a actuality. The bother is, because the company units its sights on returning folks to the moon, the ageing station has change into a monetary burden. And it is not clear what its future holds.

NASA spends between $3 billion and $4 billion a yr working the station and flying folks backwards and forwards. That’s about half the company’s finances for human exploration of house.

The United States and different collaborating nations have pledged to fund the house station till at the least 2024, however it should absolutely last more than that. Gilles Leclerc, head of house exploration on the Canadian Space Agency, says there is no manner that the worldwide companions would come collectively in 5 years and resolve to simply crash the station into the ocean in order that assets could possibly be directed to different house targets.

“It would be a waste. We cannot ditch the International Space Station. There’s just too much invested,” Leclerc says. “It’s quite clear, it’s unanimous between the partners that we continue to need a space station in low Earth orbit.”

So NASA has floated one money-saving concept: Turn the house station over to the personal sector. That’s why, a number of weeks in the past, NASA officers held a giant press occasion on the Nasdaq inventory market’s MarketSite in New York City.

“NASA is opening the International Space Station to commercial opportunities and marketing these opportunities as we’ve never done before,” mentioned the company’s chief monetary officer, Jeff DeWit. “The commercialization of low Earth orbit will enable NASA to focus resources to land the first woman and next man on the moon by 2024, as the first phase in creating a sustainable lunar presence to prepare for future missions to Mars.”

Astronaut Christina Koch appeared in video beamed down from house. “We are so excited to be part of NASA as our home and laboratory in space transitions into being accessible to expanded commercial and marketing opportunities, as well as to private astronauts,” she mentioned.

All this produced a way of déjà vu in John Logsdon, an area historian with George Washington University. In the Nineteen Eighties, when Ronald Reagan’s administration first proposed constructing a everlasting house station, a part of the pitch was “the idea that it could be a place for a wide variety of commercial activities, with billions of dollars of economic payoff,” says Logsdon. “So here we are in 2019, finally going to test that hypothesis.”

When reporters requested how a lot income may are available from new industrial actions on the station, nonetheless, NASA officers would not give any numbers, saying there was an excessive amount of uncertainty.

“The 12 industry studies NASA commissioned last year estimated revenue projections for future low-Earth orbit destinations across a variety of markets, and those projections varied significantly as a result of uncertainty associated with these future markets,” a NASA spokesperson instructed NPR. “The markets and services that will generate revenue need to be cultivated by the creative and entrepreneurial private sector.”

“That is the right answer because they don’t know yet,” says Tommy Sanford, govt director of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation.

But if the house station turned commercially operated and even privately owned, NASA may change into simply considered one of many purchasers.

“You need to be focused on adding as many customers as possible and hoping to reach a tipping point, at some point, where you retain all of them,” says Sanford. “Then that eventually lowers your cost, because you are one of many customers. You aren’t bearing the entire cost of the infrastructure and transportation.”

Some query whether or not any enterprise may make a go of working an area station with out the federal government nonetheless ponying up a ton of cash.

“Candidly, the scant commercial interest shown in the station over its nearly 20 years of operation give us pause about the agency’s current plans,” NASA Inspector General Paul Martin told members of Congress final yr.

As all of those discussions go on, the station retains getting older. Space is a harsh atmosphere. The {hardware} is carrying out, and main elements are licensed solely till 2028.

“Space station really has up to, say, less than 10 years of lifetime,” says Dava Newman, a scientist at MIT and a former NASA deputy administrator.

She loves the station and has flown experiments on it. But she thinks with time working out, there must be a strategic plan for its finish.

“There might be some elements of space station that the private [sector] might be able to take over, a module or two,” she says. “All of that needs to be put into place, probably with government funding.”

Eventually, massive elements of the station must crash again all the way down to Earth. Asked when NASA anticipated to deorbit the station, a spokesperson for the company mentioned that no particular yr is being focused.

“Transition from the space station will occur once commercial habitable destinations are available and can support NASA’s needs as one of many customers,” the spokesperson mentioned.

Copyright 2025 NPR