The Carbon Cycle – NASA Science

Carbon is the spine of life on Earth. We are product of carbon, we eat carbon, and our civilizations—our economies, our properties, our technique of transport—are constructed on carbon. We want carbon, however that want can also be entwined with one of the crucial severe issues going through us in the present day: international local weather change.

Forged within the coronary heart of getting old stars, carbon is the fourth most ample aspect within the Universe. Most of Earth’s carbon—about 65,500 billion metric tons—is saved in rocks. The relaxation is within the ocean, environment, crops, soil, and fossil fuels.

Carbon flows between every reservoir in an change referred to as the carbon cycle, which has gradual and quick parts. Any change within the cycle that shifts carbon out of 1 reservoir places extra carbon within the different reservoirs. Changes that put carbon gases into the environment end in hotter temperatures on Earth.

Over the long run, the carbon cycle appears to take care of a steadiness that forestalls all of Earth’s carbon from getting into the environment (as is the case on Venus) or from being saved totally in rocks. This steadiness helps maintain Earth’s temperature comparatively steady, like a thermostat.

This thermostat works over just a few hundred thousand years, as a part of the gradual carbon cycle. This implies that for shorter time intervals—tens to 100 thousand years—the temperature of Earth can fluctuate. And, in truth, Earth swings between ice ages and hotter interglacial intervals on these time scales. Parts of the carbon cycle might even amplify these short-term temperature adjustments.

On very very long time scales (hundreds of thousands to tens of hundreds of thousands of years), the motion of tectonic plates and adjustments within the price at which carbon seeps from the Earth’s inside might change the temperature on the thermostat. Earth has undergone such a change over the past 50 million years, from the extraordinarily heat climates of the Cretaceous (roughly 145 to 65 million years in the past) to the glacial climates of the Pleistocene (roughly 1.8 million to 11,500 years in the past). [See Divisions of Geologic Time—Major Chronostratigraphic and Geochronologic Units for more information about geological eras.]

Through a sequence of chemical reactions and tectonic exercise, carbon takes between 100-200 million years to maneuver between rocks, soil, ocean, and environment within the gradual carbon cycle. On common, 10¹³ to 10¹⁴ grams (10–100 million metric tons) of carbon transfer via the gradual carbon cycle yearly. In comparability, human emissions of carbon to the environment are on the order of 10¹⁵ grams, whereas the quick carbon cycle strikes 10¹⁶ to 10¹⁷ grams of carbon per yr.

The motion of carbon from the environment to the lithosphere (rocks) begins with rain. Atmospheric carbon combines with water to kind a weak acid—carbonic acid—that falls to the floor in rain. The acid dissolves rocks—a course of referred to as chemical weathering—and releases calcium, magnesium, potassium, or sodium ions. Rivers carry the ions to the ocean.

In the ocean, the calcium ions mix with bicarbonate ions to kind calcium carbonate, the lively ingredient in antacids and the chalky white substance that dries in your faucet in case you reside in an space with arduous water. In the fashionable ocean, a lot of the calcium carbonate is made by shell-building (calcifying) organisms (corresponding to corals) and plankton (like coccolithophores and foraminifera). After the organisms die, they sink to the seafloor. Over time, layers of shells and sediment are cemented collectively and switch to rock, storing the carbon in stone—limestone and its derivatives.

Only 80 % of carbon-containing rock is at the moment made this manner. The remaining 20 % include carbon from dwelling issues (natural carbon) which have been embedded in layers of mud. Heat and stress compress the mud and carbon over hundreds of thousands of years, forming sedimentary rock corresponding to shale. In particular circumstances, when lifeless plant matter builds up sooner than it will probably decay, layers of natural carbon turn into oil, coal, or pure gasoline as a substitute of sedimentary rock like shale.

The gradual cycle returns carbon to the environment via volcanoes. Earth’s land and ocean surfaces sit on a number of transferring crustal plates. When the plates collide, one sinks beneath the opposite, and the rock it carries melts below the intense warmth and stress. The heated rock recombines into silicate minerals, releasing carbon dioxide.

When volcanoes erupt, they vent the gasoline to the environment and canopy the land with contemporary silicate rock to start the cycle once more. At current, volcanoes emit between 130 and 380 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per yr. For comparability, people emit about 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide per yr—100–300 instances greater than volcanoes—by burning fossil fuels.

Chemistry regulates this dance between ocean, land, and environment. If carbon dioxide rises within the environment due to a rise in volcanic exercise, for instance, temperatures rise, resulting in extra rain, which dissolves extra rock, creating extra ions that may ultimately deposit extra carbon on the ocean flooring. It takes just a few hundred thousand years to rebalance the gradual carbon cycle via chemical weathering.

However, the gradual carbon cycle additionally comprises a barely sooner element: the ocean. At the floor, the place air meets water, carbon dioxide gasoline dissolves in and ventilates out of the ocean in a gradual change with the environment. Once within the ocean, carbon dioxide gasoline reacts with water molecules to launch hydrogen, making the ocean extra acidic. The hydrogen reacts with carbonate from rock weathering to provide bicarbonate ions.

Before the economic age, the ocean vented carbon dioxide to the environment in steadiness with the carbon the ocean obtained throughout rock weathering. However, since carbon concentrations within the environment have elevated, the ocean now takes extra carbon from the environment than it releases. Over millennia, the ocean will take in as much as 85 % of the additional carbon individuals have put into the environment by burning fossil fuels, however the course of is gradual as a result of it’s tied to the motion of water from the ocean’s floor to its depths.

In the meantime, winds, currents, and temperature management the speed at which the ocean takes carbon dioxide from the environment. (See The Ocean’s Carbon Balance on the Earth Observatory.) It is probably going that adjustments in ocean temperatures and currents helped take away carbon from after which restore carbon to the environment over the few thousand years wherein the ice ages started and ended.

The time it takes carbon to maneuver via the quick carbon cycle is measured in a lifespan. The quick carbon cycle is basically the motion of carbon via life varieties on Earth, or the biosphere. Between 10¹⁵ and 10¹⁷ grams (1,000 to 100,000 million metric tons) of carbon transfer via the quick carbon cycle yearly.

Carbon performs a vital position in biology due to its skill to kind many bonds—as much as 4 per atom—in a seemingly infinite number of advanced natural molecules. Many natural molecules include carbon atoms which have fashioned robust bonds to different carbon atoms, combining into lengthy chains and rings. Such carbon chains and rings are the idea of dwelling cells. For occasion, DNA is product of two intertwined molecules constructed round a carbon chain.

The bonds within the lengthy carbon chains include a whole lot of vitality. When the chains break aside, the saved vitality is launched. This vitality makes carbon molecules a superb supply of gasoline for all dwelling issues.

Plants and phytoplankton are the primary parts of the quick carbon cycle. Phytoplankton (microscopic organisms within the ocean) and crops take carbon dioxide from the environment by absorbing it into their cells. Using vitality from the Sun, each crops and plankton mix carbon dioxide (CO₂) and water to kind sugar (CH₂O) and oxygen. The chemical response appears like this:

CO₂ + H₂O + vitality = CH₂O + O₂

Four issues can occur to maneuver carbon from a plant and return it to the environment, however all contain the identical chemical response. Plants break down the sugar to get the vitality they should develop. Animals (together with individuals) eat the crops or plankton, and break down the plant sugar to get vitality. Plants and plankton die and decay (are eaten by micro organism) on the finish of the rising season. Or fireplace consumes crops. In every case, oxygen combines with sugar to launch water, carbon dioxide, and vitality. The fundamental chemical response appears like this:

CH₂O + O₂ = CO₂ + H₂O + vitality

In all 4 processes, the carbon dioxide launched within the response often leads to the environment. The quick carbon cycle is so tightly tied to flora that the rising season might be seen by the best way carbon dioxide fluctuates within the environment. In the Northern Hemisphere winter, when few land crops are rising and lots of are decaying, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations climb. During the spring, when crops start rising once more, concentrations drop. It is as if the Earth is respiratory.

Left unperturbed, the quick and gradual carbon cycles keep a comparatively regular focus of carbon within the environment, land, crops, and ocean. But when something adjustments the quantity of carbon in a single reservoir, the impact ripples via the others.

In Earth’s previous, the carbon cycle has modified in response to local weather change. Variations in Earth’s orbit alter the quantity of vitality Earth receives from the Sun and results in a cycle of ice ages and heat intervals like Earth’s present local weather. (See Milutin Milankovitch.) Ice ages developed when Northern Hemisphere summers cooled and ice constructed up on land, which in flip slowed the carbon cycle. Meanwhile, quite a few components together with cooler temperatures and elevated phytoplankton progress might have elevated the quantity of carbon the ocean took out of the environment. The drop in atmospheric carbon brought about extra cooling. Similarly, on the finish of the final Ice Age, 10,000 years in the past, carbon dioxide within the environment rose dramatically as temperatures warmed.

Shifts in Earth’s orbit are occurring always, in predictable cycles. In about 30,000 years, Earth’s orbit may have modified sufficient to scale back daylight within the Northern Hemisphere to the degrees that led to the final ice age.

Today, adjustments within the carbon cycle are occurring due to individuals. We perturb the carbon cycle by burning fossil fuels and clearing land.

When we clear forests, we take away a dense progress of crops that had saved carbon in wooden, stems, and leaves—biomass. By eradicating a forest, we get rid of crops that will in any other case take carbon out of the environment as they develop. We have a tendency to switch the dense progress with crops or pasture, which retailer much less carbon. We additionally expose soil that vents carbon from decayed plant matter into the environment. Humans are at the moment emitting just below a billion tons of carbon into the environment per yr via land use adjustments.

Without human interference, the carbon in fossil fuels would leak slowly into the environment via volcanic exercise over hundreds of thousands of years within the gradual carbon cycle. By burning coal, oil, and pure gasoline, we speed up the method, releasing huge quantities of carbon (carbon that took hundreds of thousands of years to build up) into the environment yearly. By doing so, we transfer the carbon from the gradual cycle to the quick cycle. In 2009, people launched about 8.4 billion tons of carbon into the environment by burning fossil gasoline.

Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, when individuals first began burning fossil fuels, carbon dioxide concentrations within the environment have risen from about 280 elements per million to 387 elements per million, a 39 % improve. This implies that for each million molecules within the environment, 387 of them are actually carbon dioxide—the very best focus in two million years. Methane concentrations have risen from 715 elements per billion in 1750 to 1,774 elements per billion in 2005, the very best focus in no less than 650,000 years.

All of this further carbon must go someplace. So far, land crops and the ocean have taken up about 55 % of the additional carbon individuals have put into the environment whereas about 45 % has stayed within the environment. Eventually, the land and oceans will take up a lot of the further carbon dioxide, however as a lot as 20 % might stay within the environment for a lot of 1000’s of years.

The adjustments within the carbon cycle affect every reservoir. Excess carbon within the environment warms the planet and helps crops on land develop extra. Excess carbon within the ocean makes the water extra acidic, placing marine life at risk.

Atmosphere

It is important that a lot carbon dioxide stays within the environment as a result of CO₂ is an important gasoline for controlling Earth’s temperature. Carbon dioxide, methane, and halocarbons are greenhouse gases that take in a variety of vitality—together with infrared vitality (warmth) emitted by the Earth—after which re-emit it. The re-emitted vitality travels out in all instructions, however some returns to Earth, the place it heats the floor. Without greenhouse gases, Earth can be a frozen -18 levels Celsius (0 levels Fahrenheit). With too many greenhouse gases, Earth can be like Venus, the place the greenhouse environment retains temperatures round 400 levels Celsius (750 Fahrenheit).

Because scientists know which wavelengths of vitality every greenhouse gasoline absorbs, and the focus of the gases within the environment, they’ll calculate how a lot every gasoline contributes to warming the planet. Carbon dioxide causes about 20 % of Earth’s greenhouse impact; water vapor accounts for about 50 %; and clouds account for 25 %. The relaxation is attributable to small particles (aerosols) and minor greenhouse gases like methane.

Water vapor concentrations within the air are managed by Earth’s temperature. Warmer temperatures evaporate extra water from the oceans, broaden air lots, and result in increased humidity. Cooling causes water vapor to condense and fall out as rain, sleet, or snow.

Carbon dioxide, however, stays a gasoline at a wider vary of atmospheric temperatures than water. Carbon dioxide molecules present the preliminary greenhouse heating wanted to take care of water vapor concentrations. When carbon dioxide concentrations drop, Earth cools, some water vapor falls out of the environment, and the greenhouse warming attributable to water vapor drops. Likewise, when carbon dioxide concentrations rise, air temperatures go up, and extra water vapor evaporates into the environment—which then amplifies greenhouse heating.

So whereas carbon dioxide contributes much less to the general greenhouse impact than water vapor, scientists have discovered that carbon dioxide is the gasoline that units the temperature. Carbon dioxide controls the quantity of water vapor within the environment and thus the dimensions of the greenhouse impact.

Rising carbon dioxide concentrations are already inflicting the planet to warmth up. At the identical time that greenhouse gases have been rising, common international temperatures have risen 0.8 levels Celsius (1.4 levels Fahrenheit) since 1880.

This rise in temperature isn’t all of the warming we are going to see primarily based on present carbon dioxide concentrations. Greenhouse warming doesn’t occur straight away as a result of the ocean soaks up warmth. This implies that Earth’s temperature will improve no less than one other 0.6 levels Celsius (1 diploma Fahrenheit) due to carbon dioxide already within the environment. The diploma to which temperatures go up past that relies upon partially on how way more carbon people launch into the environment sooner or later.

Ocean

About 30 % of the carbon dioxide that folks have put into the environment has subtle into the ocean via the direct chemical change. Dissolving carbon dioxide within the ocean creates carbonic acid, which will increase the acidity of the water. Or moderately, a barely alkaline ocean turns into rather less alkaline. Since 1750, the pH of the ocean’s floor has dropped by 0.1, a 30 % change in acidity.

Ocean acidification impacts marine organisms in two methods. First, carbonic acid reacts with carbonate ions within the water to kind bicarbonate. However, those self same carbonate ions are what shell-building animals like coral must create calcium carbonate shells. With much less carbonate obtainable, the animals must expend extra vitality to construct their shells. As a outcome, the shells find yourself being thinner and extra fragile.

Second, the extra acidic water is, the higher it dissolves calcium carbonate. In the long term, this response will permit the ocean to take in extra carbon dioxide as a result of extra acidic water will dissolve extra rock, launch extra carbonate ions, and improve the ocean’s capability to soak up carbon dioxide. In the meantime, although, extra acidic water will dissolve the carbonate shells of marine organisms, making them pitted and weak.

Warmer oceans—a product of the greenhouse impact—may additionally lower the abundance of phytoplankton, which develop higher in cool, nutrient-rich waters. This may restrict the ocean’s skill to take carbon from the environment via the quick carbon cycle.

On the opposite hand, carbon dioxide is crucial for plant and phytoplankton progress. An improve in carbon dioxide may improve progress by fertilizing these few species of phytoplankton and ocean crops (like sea grasses) that take carbon dioxide instantly from the water. However, most species should not helped by the elevated availability of carbon dioxide.

Land

Plants on land have taken up roughly 25 % of the carbon dioxide that people have put into the environment. The quantity of carbon that crops take up varies drastically from yr to yr, however normally, the world’s crops have elevated the quantity of carbon dioxide they take in since 1960. Only a few of this improve occurred as a direct results of fossil gasoline emissions.

With extra atmospheric carbon dioxide obtainable to transform to plant matter in photosynthesis, crops have been in a position to develop extra. This elevated progress is known as carbon fertilization. Models predict that crops would possibly develop anyplace from 12 to 76 % extra if atmospheric carbon dioxide is doubled, so long as nothing else, like water shortages, limits their progress. However, scientists don’t know the way a lot carbon dioxide is rising plant progress in the actual world, as a result of crops want greater than carbon dioxide to develop.

Plants additionally want water, daylight, and vitamins, particularly nitrogen. If a plant doesn’t have one in all this stuff, it received’t develop no matter how ample the opposite requirements are. There is a restrict to how a lot carbon crops can take out of the environment, and that restrict varies from area to area. So far, it seems that carbon dioxide fertilization will increase plant progress till the plant reaches a restrict within the quantity of water or nitrogen obtainable.

Some of the adjustments in carbon absorption are the results of land use selections. Agriculture has turn into way more intensive, so we will develop extra meals on much less land. In excessive and mid-latitudes, deserted farmland is reverting to forest, and these forests retailer way more carbon, each in wooden and soil, than crops would. In many locations, we forestall plant carbon from getting into the environment by extinguishing wildfires. This permits woody materials (which shops carbon) to construct up. All of those land use selections are serving to crops take in human-released carbon within the Northern Hemisphere.

In the tropics, nonetheless, forests are being eliminated, usually via fireplace, and this releases carbon dioxide. As of 2008, deforestation accounted for about 12 % of all human carbon dioxide emissions.

The largest adjustments within the land carbon cycle are prone to come due to local weather change. Carbon dioxide will increase temperatures, extending the rising season and rising humidity. Both components have led to some extra plant progress. However, hotter temperatures additionally stress crops. With an extended, hotter rising season, crops want extra water to outlive. Scientists are already seeing proof that crops within the Northern Hemisphere gradual their progress in the summertime due to heat temperatures and water shortages.

Dry, water-stressed crops are additionally extra inclined to fireplace and bugs when rising seasons turn into longer. In the far north, the place a rise in temperature has the best affect, the forests have already began to burn extra, releasing carbon from the crops and the soil into the environment. Tropical forests may additionally be extraordinarily inclined to drying. With much less water, tropical bushes gradual their progress and take up much less carbon, or die and launch their saved carbon to the environment.

The warming attributable to rising greenhouse gases may additionally “bake” the soil, accelerating the speed at which carbon seeps out in some locations. This is of specific concern within the far north, the place frozen soil—permafrost—is thawing. Permafrost comprises wealthy deposits of carbon from plant matter that has collected for 1000’s of years as a result of the chilly slows decay. When the soil warms, the natural matter decays and carbon—within the type of methane and carbon dioxide—seeps into the environment.

Current analysis estimates that permafrost within the Northern Hemisphere holds 1,672 billion tons (Petagrams) of natural carbon. If simply 10 % of this permafrost have been to thaw, it may launch sufficient further carbon dioxide to the environment to boost temperatures an extra 0.7 levels Celsius (1.3 levels Fahrenheit) by 2100.

Many of the questions scientists nonetheless must reply concerning the carbon cycle revolve round how it’s altering. The environment now comprises extra carbon than at any time in no less than two million years. Each reservoir of the cycle will change as this carbon makes its means via the cycle.

What will these adjustments appear to be? What will occur to crops as temperatures improve and local weather adjustments? Will they take away extra carbon from the environment than they put again? Will they turn into much less productive? How a lot further carbon will melting permafrost put into the environment, and the way a lot will that amplify warming? Will ocean circulation or warming change the speed at which the ocean takes up carbon? Will ocean life turn into much less productive? How a lot will the ocean acidify, and what results will which have?

NASA’s position in answering these questions is to offer international satellite tv for pc observations and associated area observations. As of early 2011, two sorts of satellite tv for pc devices have been accumulating info related to the carbon cycle.

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) devices, flying on NASA’s Terra and Aqua satellites, measure the quantity of carbon crops and phytoplankton flip into matter as they develop, a measurement referred to as internet major productiveness. The MODIS sensors additionally measure what number of fires happen and the place they burn.

Two Landsat satellites present an in depth view of ocean reefs, what’s rising on land, and the way land cowl is altering. It is feasible to see the expansion of a metropolis or a metamorphosis from forest to farm. This info is essential as a result of land use accounts for one-third of all human carbon emissions.

Future NASA satellites will proceed these observations, and likewise measure carbon dioxide and methane within the environment and vegetation peak and construction.

All of those measurements will assist us see how the worldwide carbon cycle is altering via time. They will assist us gauge the affect we’re having on the carbon cycle by releasing carbon into the environment or discovering methods to retailer it elsewhere. They will present us how our altering local weather is altering the carbon cycle, and the way the altering carbon cycle is altering our local weather.

Most of us, nonetheless, will observe adjustments within the carbon cycle in a extra private means. For us, the carbon cycle is the meals we eat, the electrical energy in our properties, the gasoline in our vehicles, and the climate over our heads. We are part of the carbon cycle, and so our selections about how we reside ripple throughout the cycle. Likewise, adjustments within the carbon cycle will affect the best way we reside. As every of us come to grasp our position within the carbon cycle, the information empowers us to regulate our private affect and to grasp the adjustments we’re seeing on the earth round us.

• Angert, A., Biraud, S., Bonfils, C., Henning, C.C., Buermann, W., Pinzon, J., Tucker, C.J., and Fung, I. (2005, August 2). Drier summers cancel out the CO2 uptake enhancement induced by warmer springs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102 (31), 10823-10827.
• Archer, D. (2008, May). Carbon cycle: Checking the thermostat. Nature Geoscience, 1, 289-290.
• Behrenfeld, M.J., et al. (2006, December 7). Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature, 444, 752-755.
• Berner, R.A. (2003, November 20). The long-term carbon cycle, fossil fuels and atmospheric composition. Nature, 426, 323-326.
• Bonan, G.B. (2008, June 13). Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefit of forests. Science, 320, 1444-1449.
• Campbell, N.A. and Reece, J.B. (2005). Biology. San Francisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings. seventh ed.
• Denecke, E.J. (2002) Earth Science: The Physical Setting Hauppauge, New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
• Denman, Okay.L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P.M., Dickinson, R.E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D., Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P.L., Wofsy, S.C. and Zhang, X. (2007) Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
• Doney, S.C. (2006, March). The dangers of ocean acidification. Scientific American, 58-65.
• Emsley, J. (2001). Nature’s Building Blocks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Goetz, S.J., Bunn, A.G., Fiske, G.J., and Houghton, R.A. (2005, September 20). Satellite-observed photosynthetic trends across boreal North America associated with climate and fire disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (38), 13521-13525.
• Global Carbon Project. (2010, November 21). Carbon budget 2009. Accessed May 4, 2011.
• Grosse, G., Romanovsky, V., Jorgenson, T., Anthony, Okay.W., Brown, J., and Overduin, P.P. (2011, March 1). Vulnerability and feedbacks of permafrost to local weather change. EOS, 92 (9), 73-74.
• Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., and Lo, Okay. (2010, December 14). Global surface temperature change. Reviews of Geophysics, 48, RG4004.
• Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., Willis, J., Del Genio, A., Koch, D., Lacis, A., Lo, Okay., Menon, S., Novakov, T., Perlwitz, J., Russel, G., Schmidt, G.A., and Tausnev, N. (2005, June 3). Earth’s energy imbalance: Confirmation and implications. Science, 308 (5727), 1431-1435.
• Hardt, M.J., and Safina, C. (2010, August). How acidification threatens oceans from the inside out. Scientific American.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
• Jouzel, J., et al. (2007). EPICA Dome C Ice Core 800KYr Deuterium Data and Temperature Estimates. IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series #2007-091. NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA. Accessed June 13, 2010.
• Lacis, A.A., Schmidt, G.A., Rind, D., and Ruedy, R.A. (2010, October 15). Atmospheric CO2: Principal control governing Earth’s temperature. Science, 330 (6002), 356-359.
• Lacis, A. (2010, October). CO2: The thermostat that controls Earth’s temperature. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Accessed December 17, 2010.
• Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M.P., Canadell, J.G., Marland, G., et al. (2009, November 17). Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience, 2, 831-836.
• Lüthi, D., M. Le Floch, B. Bereiter, T. Blunier, J.-M. Barnola, U. Siegenthaler, D. Raynaud, J. Jouzel, H. Fischer, Okay. Kawamura, and T.F. Stocker. (2008, May 15). High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before present. Nature, 453, 379-382.
• McKinley, G.A. (2010). Carbon and Climate. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Accessed May 4, 2011.
• Oren, R., Ellsworth, D.S., Johnsen, Okay.H., Phillips, N., Ewers, B.E., Maier, C., Schäfer, Okay.V.R., McCarthy, H., Hendrey, G., McNulty, S.G., and Katul, G.G. (2001, May 24). Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched environment. Nature, 411, 469-472.
• Orr, J.C. et al. (2005, September 29). Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature, 437, 681-686.
• Rothman, L.S., Gordon, I.E., Barbe, A., Benner, D.C., et al. (2009, June-July). The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110 (9-10), 533-572.
• Sabine, C.L. and Feely, R.A. (2007). The oceanic sink for carbon dioxide. In Greenhouse Gas Sinks, eds D.S. Reay, C.N. Hewitt, Okay.A. Smith, and J. Grace. CAB International.
• Sabine, C.L., et al. (2004, July 16). The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science, 305 (5682), 367-371.
• Schlesinger, W.H. (1991). Biogeochemistry, An Analysis of Global Change. San Diego: Academic Press.
• Schmidt, G.A., Ruedy, R.A., Miller, R.L., and Lacis, A.A. (2010, October 16). Attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, D20106.
• Schmidt, G. (2010, October). Taking the measure of the greenhouse effect. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Accessed December 17, 2010.
• Schuur, E.A.G., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J.G., Euskirchen. E, Field, C.B., Goryachkin, S.V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P.M., Lee, H., Mazhitova, G., nelson, F.E., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V.E., Shiklomanov, N., Tarnocai, C., Venevsky, S., Vogel, J.G., and Zimov, S.A. (2008, September). Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: Implications for the global carbon cycle. BioScience, 58 (8), 701-714.
• Scientific Committee of Problems of the Environment 13. (1979). Carbon in the rock cycle. In The Global Carbon Cycle, B. Bolin, E.T. Degens, S. Kempe, and P. Ketner, eds. Accessed May 4, 2011.
• Sellers, P. J., Hall, F. G., Asrar, G., Strebel, D. E., and Murphy, R. E. (1992, November 30). An Overview of the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE), Journal of Geophysical Research, 97 (D17), 18,345–18,371.
• Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J.G., Schuur, E.A.G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G., and Zimov, S. (2009, June 27). Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23, GB2023.
• United States Department of Energy. (2008, October 9). How fossil fuels were formed. Accessed December 17, 2010.
• United States Geological Survey. (2010, August 5). Volcanic gases and climate change overview. Accessed May 4, 2011.
• van der Werf, G.R., Morton, D.C., DeFries, R.S., Olivier, J.G.J., Kasibhatla, P.S., Jackson, R.B., Collatz, G.J., and Randerson, J.T. (2009, November). CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience, 2, 737-738.
• Zachos, J., M. Pagani, L. Sloan, E. Thomas, and Okay. Billups. (2001, April 27). Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present. Science, 292, (5517), 686-693.
• Zeebe, R.E., and Caldeira, Okay. (2008, May). Close mass balance of long-term carbon fluxes from ice-core CO2 and ocean chemistry records. Nature Geoscience, 1, 312-315.

NASA Earth Observatory story by Holli Riebeek; Design by Robert Simmon