no) : Short Wave : NPR

EMILY KWONG: Hello there, Short Wavers, Emily Kwong right here with a fast phrase earlier than the present. So this week is Giving Tuesday. That is the worldwide day of generosity that NPR celebrates yearly. But this 12 months is completely different as a result of it’s the first time in 50 years that NPR is working with out federal funding. That is a large deal and a giant problem, however it’s one which we will tackle collectively. At Short Wave, we convey you science protection that’s enjoyable, human, that introduces you to new concepts, superb discoveries, and on a regular basis mysteries, that helps you are feeling a bit extra linked to this planet and the individuals we share it with. We know all of this issues to you, and that’s the reason a few of you’ve gotten already stepped as much as share in the price of bringing you Short Wave every week, like Gloria, a listener in Texas, who says, “I would be less informed, thoughtful, and interesting without Fresh Air, Throughline, Short Wave, and Up First. I love these programs, and I hope they continue.” We are so grateful to listeners like Gloria who’ve stepped as much as assist NPR this 12 months. You can be part of them. Sign up for NPR+ and mark Giving Tuesday. This is an easy, recurring donation that will get you perks to NPR’s podcasts. Join at plus.npr.org. Thanks once more in your assist. Here’s the present.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

KWONG: You’re listening to Short Wave from NPR. Hey, Short Wavers, Emily Kwong right here with my favourite astrophysicist. You know her. You love her. You hear her lots. Her title is Regina Barber.

REGINA BARBER: Aw, Emily. Thank you for studying that so nicely. I wrote that for you.

KWONG: Oh, my god. Don’t out me. Gina–

BARBER: Yes.

KWONG: –you are right here to inform us about 3I/ATLAS.

BARBER: Yes.

KWONG: I preserve listening to about this comet, however why are individuals so obsessed?

BARBER: So Em, this comet is not from right here. Like, she would not even go right here.

[CHUCKLING]

BARBER: OK, that is my Mean Girls reference. Do you prefer it?

KWONG: I do.

BARBER: OK, so it is a piece of ice and fuel and rock, like most comets are, nevertheless it’s from one other photo voltaic system. It’s interstellar. But we all know it is from our personal galaxy.

KWONG: OK.

BARBER: We realize it was created round one other star, not our solar. And we get to see it as soon as after which by no means once more.

KWONG: So wait, it isn’t like Halley’s Comet–

BARBER: Yeah.

KWONG: –which comes, what, each 70-something years?

BARBER: 76 years, yeah.

KWONG: This is only one and executed.

BARBER: Yeah.

KWONG: How can we even know it is a comet–

BARBER: Yeah, so–

KWONG: –and not, like, an asteroid?

BARBER: Yeah, so astronomers have been learning 3I/ATLAS since July of this 12 months. We know it is a comet as a result of it has this icy nucleus. It has a brilliant cloud of fuel and dirt.

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: Astronomers can see this by their telescopes. They additionally see that it has a tiny tail. And most comets we see from Earth, they orbit our solar. And they’re made in the course of the formation of our photo voltaic system. But this one, this comet, 3I/ATLAS, it got here from elsewhere. It’s going to return in. Then it should depart.

KWONG: And she’ll scream, get in, loser. We’re going buying. On the way in which. Bye.

BARBER: [LAUGHS] Yes.

KWONG: OK, so why are astronomers so invested in learning her?

BARBER: Because 3I/ATLAS tells us one thing about planets–

KWONG: Oh.

BARBER: –around different stars, which we undoubtedly care about.

JOHN TONRY: It’s the one approach we’re ever going to get materials from one other photo voltaic system, I imply, definitely, inside our lifetimes.

BARBER: That’s John Tonry, an astronomer who was a part of a group that created the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial Impact Last Alert System, or ATLAS. And they had been accountable for discovering this comet, and it was the third ever detected interstellar comet.

KWONG: Oh, that is why it is 3I.

BARBER: Yes, ATLAS.

KWONG: I stands for interstellar.

BARBER: Interstellar, yeah. And ATLAS, by the way in which, they do lots. They survey your entire sky a number of occasions an evening. And additionally they search for objects which will collide with Earth.

TONRY: After all, if one thing’s going to hit us, simply earlier than it hits us, it will get actually brilliant and actually massive. And so it isn’t arduous to seek out. You simply must be trying in the fitting place on the proper time.

BARBER: Although this comet, to be clear, isn’t going to affect Earth.

KWONG: That’s good. OK. What else are individuals saying about 3I/ATLAS?

BARBER: So, like the primary interstellar comet– that one was present in 2017– there’s this web rumor mill, and it is occurring about how 3I/ATLAS could possibly be alien know-how. But John says, no approach.

TONRY: I’ll wager you my home at 50/50 odds that it is pure. And I’ll take you to the financial institution daily. There’s simply not an opportunity that I’d be frightened about that wager.

KWONG: He sounds enjoyable.

BARBER: Yeah. Yeah, he’s enjoyable. I did not know this till, like, I began researching this story, however he’s my PhD advisor’s PhD advisor–

KWONG: What?

BARBER: –so he’s my tutorial grandfather.

KWONG: Respect.

BARBER: But simply because this is not aliens doesn’t imply that this interstellar comet is not thrilling.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

KWONG: So in the present day on the present, we go interstellar with the comet 3I/ATLAS, what it could inform us about one other a part of the galaxy far, far-off.

BARBER: And what was so fascinating concerning the first interstellar comet discovered, ‘Oumuamua. I’m Regina Barber.

KWONG: And I’m Emily Kwong. And you are listening to Short Wave, the science podcast from NPR.

KWONG: OK, Gina, earlier than we get into this new interstellar comet, why is everybody so obsessive about them? Why are you so obsessive about me? Isn’t {that a} Mean Girls line, too?

BARBER: Yeah. Yes, it’s. It is.

KWONG: Oh, no. Why are individuals so into this subject?

BARBER: Because they’re actually, actually uncommon. So I talked to Teddy Kareta. He’s a planetary astronomer at Villanova University.

TEDDY KARETA: When the primary one in all these objects, 1I/’Oumuamua, from the Hawaiian phrase for “scout,” was found in October of 2017, I had solely been a graduate scholar for about two months. And I actually type of thought, oh, that is the one we’re ever going to seek out, [CHUCKLES] proper? You know, I’m so out of luck.

KWONG: But we clearly discovered one other one.

BARBER: Yeah, yeah. And he was really a part of the group that studied the second one– this was in 2019– 2I/Borisov. And then he is additionally learning this new one, 3I/ATLAS.

KWONG: Oh, I bear in mind protecting Borisov on Short Wave.

BARBER: Yeah. Our present had simply began round that point. So it looks as if from the very starting, although, individuals have been baffled by these objects.

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: ‘Oumuamua additionally raised allegations that it got here from alien tech.

KWONG: Why?

BARBER: Yeah. It did not have a tail. And most comets do.

KWONG: A comet with out a tail. Yeah.

BARBER: Yeah. And when, you understand, comets transfer irregularly, like, you know– like one thing’s pushing it or one thing’s popping out of it like a rocket–

KWONG: It seems to be suspicious.

BARBER: Right. So here is my PhD grandfather once more, John Tonry, and I speaking about this controversy.

TONRY: As quickly as we found it, we form of jumped in and did a bunch of type of back-of-the-envelope issues, like, nicely, may or not it’s an alien spacecraft if it had been blah, blah, blah, blah, blah– you understand, all that form of stuff–

BARBER: Yeah.

TONRY: –that’s fun–

BARBER: Yeah.

TONRY: –fun to consider.

BARBER: It will get the scholars engaged.

TONRY: Mm-hmm. But there’s principally no motive to suppose that it is something apart from a bodily object. But whenever you come all the way down to how come it is dry, many of the issues we might count on to be ejected from different stars or our personal are simply loaded with risky molecules, like water and CO2 and CO–

BARBER: Yeah.

TONRY: –and so forth and so forth. And in order that’s type of unusual.

BARBER: So when astronomers say “volatiles,” they imply stuff like ice. You know, so when it will get sizzling, it turns into fuel. And relating to comets, you understand, a few of that may make a tail.

KWONG: OK, so ‘Oumuamua had no tail, was type of dry, moved in a bizarre approach.

BARBER: Yeah. But what actually received lots of people enthusiastic about ‘Oumuamua was that bizarre motion I discussed earlier. Like, it moved as if one thing was pushing or pulling it. Gravity from a planet or a moon or a solar because it passes by is basically the one factor that does that in area. But it was shifting prefer it had exhaust, perhaps from volatiles, however we could not see these volatiles.

TONRY: There was a bit bit, only a teeny weeny, weeny bit of additional acceleration that was ascertained because it was shifting away. And individuals received very enthusiastic about that. And there have been a lot of theories about what it may have been. Maybe essentially the most lifelike ones are simply nitrogen or hydrogen pockets of–

BARBER: Right.

TONRY: –those molecules that received boiled off.

BARBER: And you would not essentially be capable of see that.

TONRY: You would not be capable of see it as a result of they would not get excited, so they would not emit any mild. And so that you simply would not realize it.

KWONG: So it would be like invisible comet farts–

BARBER: Yes.

KWONG: –were inflicting little, like, bops within the motion or one thing?

BARBER: Yeah, I imply, and we additionally did not see it for very lengthy. It was solely right here for a few weeks.

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: But Teddy pointed out–

KARETA: While there was by no means, by any means, a very massive fraction of scientists who had been, for instance, prepared to entertain or actually that on this concept that perhaps this object was synthetic, it had been constructed, it was a way associated to aliens– that is to not say that we had a simple time explaining a lot of its properties shortly.

KWONG: What a baffling little interstellar customer. We’re so glad that she got here by. But it’s– and it seems like scientists did come to the consensus that 1I/’Oumuamua was not made by aliens.

BARBER: No.

KWONG: It was made by nature.

BARBER: No aliens.

KWONG: OK. Let’s speak about this new interstellar visitor–

BARBER: OK.

KWONG: –3I/ATLAS. Will it inform us one thing about different photo voltaic methods if scientists handle to actually research it relating to see us?

BARBER: Yeah, that is the aim. So like, interstellar comets, like I stated, they fashioned round one other star–

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: –in our galaxy with the identical materials that in all probability that star’s planets fashioned.

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: So–

KWONG: So they carry chemical clues from, like, distant worlds?

BARBER: Yeah. So if we decide what the interstellar comet is made out of–

KWONG: Wow.

BARBER: –we can examine them to comets in our personal photo voltaic system. And we will work out, is our photo voltaic system regular? Is it distinctive?

KWONG: Yeah. But how do scientists work out, like, the chemical elements of a comet? You cannot catch it.

BARBER: Yeah. So what we do is we really have a look at the sunshine. Like most astronomers, all we will do is have a look at light–

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: –unless we’ve superior discover. Then we will really ship a spacecraft out. And we have executed this earlier than. We’ve despatched it to asteroids and introduced again materials.

KWONG: Right, like Bennu. Yeah.

BARBER: Yeah, however this one we’re not going to, like, ship a spacecraft to. We’re going to take a look at its mild and the way it’s mirrored off this comet. And what that appears like can inform us concerning the comet’s composition. Ice is fairly reflective, so we will look and we will see, perhaps there’s ice. We may have a look at the colour.

KARETA: When you see a comet along with your bare eye, and also you discover it seems to be a smidgen inexperienced, that is as a result of diatomic carbon, carbon bonded to carbon, is glowing within the daylight and altering the way in which it seems to be to you.

KWONG: Do we all know what shade 3I/ATLAS is?

BARBER: So that is really fairly sophisticated, as a result of a comet’s shade can change over time. So when it was discovered, it appeared a bit reddish. And now it seems to be a bit greenish blue, extra just like the comets in our photo voltaic system.

KWONG: OK.

BARBER: And all of it relies upon additionally on, like, what telescopes are it, like, what filters–

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: –but additionally what’s taking place to the comet, proper? So if it will get hotter, it is perhaps, like, boiling off completely different stuff when it will get nearer to the solar, you understand? So it is determined by what’s really taking place to the comet.

KWONG: Oh.

BARBER: Here’s Teddy once more, speaking about what scientists are .

KARETA: So we will type out not simply what sorts of gases are being emitted by the comet primarily based on the way in which that they glow within the daylight, however we will decide the ratios of them, too. We can begin to group them collectively, ask if two comets look the identical, even when one is lots nearer, lots brighter. We can examine, oh, nicely, it has extra of this sort of molecule than this different one. Maybe it is like this traditional comet.

KWONG: I’m joyful for Teddy, although, as a result of it seems like he went from pondering, I’m by no means going to see one in all these interstellar comets–

BARBER: Yeah. [LAUGHS]

KWONG: –to seeing three in his lifetime, learning two.

BARBER: Yeah.

KWONG: Why does he think– I do not know– science has been capable of finding so many interstellar comets just lately?

BARBER: Yeah, I undoubtedly requested him that. I used to be like, is it new know-how?

KWONG: Yeah.

BARBER: But he speculates that scientists now simply know what to search for.

KWONG: Oh.

KARETA: As NASA and the opposite area companies have funded and supported searches for near-Earth asteroids, harmful comets, issues that get shut by, it isn’t only a query that we’re scanning extra of the sky– and we’re. It is also that the groups who do it are getting higher at discovering fainter sorts of sources of their knowledge.

KWONG: Yeah. I imply, this issues for science. And it additionally issues for, like, safety, as a result of we do not need one in all these comets hitting us.

BARBER: Unless you are my tutorial grandfather, John. He informed me about an asteroid that ATLAS discovered referred to as YR4.

TONRY: Oh, it may have been so good. It was so good. It very probably may have hit the Earth in 2032, perhaps over the South Atlantic, with a few 100-megaton explosion. It would have been a giant explosion.

BARBER: But we might have been tremendous. People would have been tremendous.

TONRY: Probably.

BARBER: [LAUGHS]

TONRY: We now know it isn’t going to hit in 2032, so it is a massive disappointment.

BARBER: [LAUGHS] Why is it a disappoint– did you wish to be, like, the one to be like, I discovered it? We could make preparations.

TONRY: Yes.

BARBER: Got it. Got it. Let’s simply be clear right here, you are not a monster.

TONRY: That’s proper. That’s proper. That’s proper. We have a goal in life, which is to provide you warning–

BARBER: Right.

TONRY: –on a civil protection time scale.

BARBER: You wish to in a position to give warning.

TONRY: And if I’d been in a position to say, there, in the event you hadn’t funded us, you’ll have been sorry.

BARBER: [LAUGHS]

TONRY: That would have been nice.

BARBER: Yeah.

TONRY: So it is nonetheless conceivable it’d hit the moon in 2032.

BARBER: Well, OK, moon, one thing may nonetheless be coming for you but.

KWONG: Yeah. [CHUCKLES] Gina Barber, thanks a lot for approaching to speak about interstellar comets and why they aren’t aliens.

BARBER: You’re welcome. You’re welcome. This is our beat now, interstellar. Interstellar without end.

KWONG: Interstellar buddies.

BARBER: Yeah.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

KWONG: If you appreciated this episode, take a look at our present on the physics of the movie Interstellar or our episode on how Pluto, regardless of not being a planet, remains to be useful for studying how our photo voltaic system fashioned. We’ll hyperlink each of those masterpieces in our episode notes.

BARBER: [LAUGHS] Also, NPR’s first ever Pod Club Awards are arising, and you’ll crown the winner of the People’s Choice Award. Vote for us at npr.org/peopleschoice.

KWONG: This episode was produced by Rachel Carlson. It was edited by our showrunner, Rebecca Ramirez.

BARBER: Tyler Jones checked the information. Kwesi Lee was the audio engineer. Beth Donovan is our vp for podcasting. And I’m Regina Barber.

KWONG: And I’m Emily Kwong. Thank you for listening to Short Wave from NPR.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.