This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-026-03035-1
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
Russell, S. & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Pearson Press, 2021).
Turing, A. M. Computing equipment and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950).
Tracy, M., Cerdá, M. & Keyes, Okay. M. Agent-based modeling in public well being: present functions and future instructions. Annu. Rev. Public Health 39, 77–94 (2018).
Sridharan, P. & Ghosh, M. Gene expression and agent-based modeling enhance precision prognosis in breast most cancers. Sci. Rep. 15, 17059 (2025).
Wei, J. et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in giant language fashions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 24824–24837 (2022).
Christiano, P. F. et al. Deep reinforcement studying from human preferences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 30 (eds Guyon, I. et al.) (Curran Associates, 2017).
Wang, Y. et al. Reinforcement studying for reasoning in giant language fashions with one coaching instance. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
DeepSearch-AI et al. DeepSearch-V3.2: Pushing the frontier of open giant language fashions. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Rastogi, A. et al. Magistral. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep studying. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Burstein, J., Doran, C. & Solorio, T. (eds). BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1, 4171–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Workshop, B. et al. BLOOM: a 176B-parameter open-access multilingual language mannequin. Preprint at arXiv (2022).
Ji, Z. et al. Survey of hallucination in pure language technology. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 248:1–248:38 (2023).
Kalai, A. T., Nachum, O., Vempala, S. S. & Zhang, E. Why language fashions hallucinate. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Jayaraman, P., Desman, J., Sabounchi, M., Nadkarni, G. N. & Sakhuja, A. A primer on reinforcement studying in medication for clinicians. NPJ Digit. Med. 7, 337 (2024).
Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (The MIT Press, 2020).
Ouyang, L. et al. Training language fashions to observe directions with human suggestions. In Proceedings of the thirty sixth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Koyejo, S. et al.) 27730–27744 (Curran Associates, 2022).
Casper, S. et al. Open issues and basic limitations of reinforcement studying from human suggestions. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (2023).
Skalse, J., Howe, N. H. R., Krasheninnikov, D. & Krueger, D. Defining and characterizing reward hacking. In Proceedings of the thirty sixth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Koyejo, S. et al.) 9460–9471 (Curran Associates, 2022).
Uesato, J. et al. Solving math phrase issues with process- and outcome-based suggestions. Preprint at arXiv (2022).
Lightman, H. et al. Let’s confirm step-by-step. In Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Kim, B. et al.) 39578–39601 (2024).
Guo, D. et al. DeepSearch-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs by means of reinforcement studying. Nature 645, 633–638 (2025).
Bai, Y. et al. Constitutional AI: harmlessness from AI suggestions. Preprint at arXiv (2022).
Novikov, A. et al. AlphaEvolve: a coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Gibney, E. DeepMind unveils ‘spectacular’ general-purpose science AI. Nature 641, 827–828 (2025).
Zhang, J., Hu, S., Lu, C., Lange, R. & Clune, J. Darwin Godel Machine: open-ended evolution of self-improving brokers. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J. & Okazaki, N. (eds). Towards reasoning in giant language fashions: a survey. In Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 1049–1065 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Hendrycks, D. et al. Measuring mathematical downside fixing with the MATH dataset. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks Vol. 1 (eds Vanschoren, J. & Yeung, S.) (2021).
Korhonen, A., Traum, D. & Màrquez, L. (eds). Explain your self! Leveraging language fashions for commonsense reasoning. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 4932–4942 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Taylor, R. et al. Galactica: a big language mannequin for science. Preprint at arXiv (2022).
Wang, L. et al. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning in giant language fashions: a survey of methodologies. Artif. Intell. Rev. 58, 227 (2025).
Fu, Y., Peng, H., Sabharwal, A., Clark, P. & Khot, T. Complexity-based prompting for multi-step reasoning. In Proceedings of the eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Liu, Y. et al.) (2023).
Agirre, E., Apidianaki, M. & Vulić, I. (eds). What makes good in-context examples for GPT-3? In Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO 2022): The third Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures 100–114 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022).
Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Li, M. & Smola, A. Automatic chain of thought prompting in giant language fashions. In Proceedings of the eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Liu, Y. et al.) (2023).
Yao, S. et al. Tree of ideas: deliberate downside fixing with giant language fashions. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 11809–11822 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Besta, M. et al. Graph of ideas: fixing elaborate issues with giant language fashions. AAAI 38, 17682–17690 (2024).
Shojaee, P. et al. The phantasm of pondering: understanding the strengths and limitations of reasoning fashions by way of the lens of downside complexity. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Goyal, S. et al. Think earlier than you communicate: coaching language fashions with pause tokens. In Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Kim, B. et al.) 27896–27923 (2024).
Inui, Okay., Jiang, J., Ng, V. & Wan, X. (eds). PubMedQA: a dataset for biomedical analysis query answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the ninth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) 2567–2577 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Cobbe, Okay. et al. Training verifiers to resolve math phrase issues. Preprint at arXiv (2021).
Ku, L.-W., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V. (eds). Math-Shepherd: confirm and reinforce LLMs step-by-step with out human annotations. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 1, 9426–9439 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, Okay. & Yao, S. Reflexion: language brokers with verbal reinforcement studying. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 8634–8652 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Gou, Z. et al. CRITIC: giant language fashions can self-correct with tool-interactive critiquing. In Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Kim, B. et al.) 57734–57811 (2024).
Madaan, A. et al. Self-refine: iterative refinement with self-feedback. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 46534–46594 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Crosby, M., Rovatsos, M. & Petrick, R. Automated agent decomposition for classical planning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Vol. 23 (eds Borrajo, D. et al.) 46–54 (2013).
Huang, X. et al. Understanding the planning of LLM brokers: a survey. Preprint at arXiv (2024).
Zhou, D. et al. Least-to-most prompting permits complicated reasoning in giant language fashions. In Proceedings of the eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Liu, Y. et al.) (2023).
Xu, B. et al. ReWOO: decoupling reasoning from observations for environment friendly augmented language fashions. Preprint at arXiv (2023).
Yao, S. et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and performing in language fashions. In Proceedings of the eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Liu, Y. et al.) (2023).
Shen, Y. et al. HuggingGPT: Solving AI duties with ChatGPT and its mates in Hugging Face. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 38154–38180 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Duh, Okay., Gomez, H. & Bethard, S. (eds). ADaPT: as-needed decomposition and planning with language fashions. In Proceedings of Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 4226–4252 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Liu, B. et al. LLM + P: empowering giant language fashions with optimum planning proficiency. Preprint at arXiv (2023).
Feng, P. et al. AGILE: a novel reinforcement studying framework of LLM brokers. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 37 (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 5244–5284 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the problem of bigger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine studying in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L. & Vanschoren, J. (eds). Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges pp. 151–160 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).
Hernandez, J. G., Saini, A. Okay., Ghosh, A. & Moore, J. H. The tree-based pipeline optimization software: tackling biomedical analysis issues with genetic programming and automatic machine studying. Patterns 6, 101314 (2025).
Himmelstein, D. S. et al. Systematic integration of biomedical information prioritizes medicine for repurposing. Elife 6, e26726 (2017).
Swanson, Okay., Wu, W., Bulaong, N. L., Pak, J. E. & Zou, J. The Virtual Lab of AI brokers designs new SARS-CoV-2 nanobodies. Nature 646, 716–723 (2025).
Schick, T. et al. Toolformer: language fashions can educate themselves to make use of instruments. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 68539–68551 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Lu, P. et al. Chameleon: plug-and-play compositional reasoning with giant language fashions. In Proceedings of the thirty seventh International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 36 (eds Oh, A. et al.) 43447–43478 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Patil, S. G., Zhang, T., Wang, X. & Gonzalez, J. E. Gorilla: Large language mannequin linked with large APIs. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 37 (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 126544–126565 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Lewis, P. et al. Retrieval-augmented technology for knowledge-intensive NLP duties. In Proceedings of the thirty fourth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Larochelle, H. et al.) 9459–9474 (Curran Associates, 2020).
Petroni, F. et al. How context impacts language fashions’ factual predictions. In Proceedings of the Automated Knowledge Base Construction (eds McCallum, A. et al.) (2020).
Fan, W. et al. A survey on RAG assembly LLMs: in the direction of retrieval-augmented giant language fashions. In Proceedings of the thirtieth ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (eds Baeza-Yates, R. & Bronchi, F.) 6491–6501 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024).
Jeong, M., Sohn, J., Sung, M. & Kang, J. Improving medical reasoning by means of retrieval and self-reflection with retrieval-augmented giant language fashions. Bioinformatics 40, i119–i129 (2024).
Lu, J. et al. MemoChat: tuning LLMs to make use of memos for constant long-range open-domain dialog. Preprint at arXiv (2023).
Zhong, W., Guo, L., Gao, Q., Ye, H. & Wang, Y. MemoryBank: enhancing giant language fashions with long-term reminiscence. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (eds Wooldridge, M., Dy, J. & Natarajan, S.) 19724–19731 (2024).
Park, J. S. et al. Generative brokers: interactive simulacra of human conduct. Preprint at arXiv (2023).
Li, Y. et al. ChatDoctor: a medical chat mannequin fine-tuned on a big language mannequin meta-AI (LLaMA) utilizing medical area information. Cureus 15, e40895 (2023).
Rasmussen, P., Paliychuk, P., Beauvais, T., Ryan, J. & Chalef, D. Zep: a temporal information graph structure for agent reminiscence. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Edge, D. et al. From native to world: a graph RAG method to query-focused summarization. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Zhang, Z. et al. A survey on the reminiscence mechanism of enormous language model-based brokers. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 43, 155:1–155:47 (2025).
Yan, B. et al. Beyond self-talk: a communication-centric survey of LLM-based multi-agent techniques. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Ku, L.-W., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V. ChatDev: communicative brokers for software program growth. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 1, 15174–15186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Hong, S. et al. MetaGPT: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. In Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Kim, B. et al.) 23247–23275 (2024).
Zhuge, M. et al. GPTSwarm: language brokers as optimizable graphs. In Proceedings of the forty first International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 235 (eds Salakhutdinov, R. R. et al.) 62743–62767 (2024).
Google Cloud. Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol. a2a-protocol.org/newest/ (2025).
Borghoff, U. M., Bottoni, P. & Pareschi, R. Human-artificial interplay within the age of agentic AI: a system-theoretical method. Front. Hum. Dyn. 7, 1579166 (2025).
Hua, W. et al. Interactive speculative planning: improve agent effectivity by means of co-design of system and person interface. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al) 14256–14283 (2025).
Hou, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, S. & Wang, H. Model Context Protocol (MCP): panorama, safety threats, and future analysis instructions. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Kuehl, M. et al. BioContextAI is a group hub for agentic biomedical techniques. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1755–1757 (2025).
Yang, J. et al. SWE-agent: Agent-computer interfaces allow automated software program engineering. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 37 (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 50528–50652 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Ferber, D. et al. Development and validation of an autonomous synthetic intelligence agent for medical decision-making in oncology. Nat. Cancer 6, 1337–1349 (2025).
Ku, L.-W., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V. (eds). MedAgents: giant language fashions as collaborators for zero-shot medical reasoning. In Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 599–621 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Tu, T. et al. Towards conversational diagnostic synthetic intelligence. Nature 642, 442–450 (2025).
Li, S. et al. SciLitLLM: How to adapt LLMs for scientific literature understanding. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) 56025–56048 (2025).
Wang, Y. et al. Biomedical info retrieval with positive-unlabeled studying and information graphs. In ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (ACM, 2024).
Yang, Z., Dabre, R., Tanaka, H. & Okazaki, N. SciCap+: a information augmented dataset to check the challenges of scientific determine captioning. J. Nat. Lang. Process. 31, 1140–1165 (2024).
Zhang, S. et al. A multimodal biomedical basis mannequin skilled from fifteen million picture–textual content pairs. NEJM AI 2, AIoa2400640 (2025).
Qi, B. et al. Large language fashions as biomedical speculation mills: a complete analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Language Modeling (eds. Artzi, Y. et al.) (2024).
Gottweis, J. et al. Towards an AI co-scientist. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Zhang, Y. et al. A complete large-scale biomedical information graph for AI-powered data-driven biomedical analysis. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 602–614 (2025).
Huang, Okay. et al. Automated speculation validation with agentic sequential falsifications. In Proceedings of the forty second International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 267 (eds Singh, A. et al.) 25372–25437 (PMLR, 2025).
O’Donoghue, O. et al. BioPlanner: automated analysis of LLMs on protocol planning in biology. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Bouamor, H., Pino, J. & Bali, Okay.) 2676–2694 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Roohani, Y. et al. BioDiscoveryAgent: an AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) 26417–26466 (2025).
Liu, S. et al. DrugAgent: automating AI-aided drug discovery programming by means of LLM multi-agent collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd AI4Research Workshop: Towards a Knowledge-Grounded Scientific Research Lifecycle (eds Wang, Q. et al.) (2024).
Ma, M. D. et al. Orchestrating software ecosystem of drug discovery with intention-aware LLM brokers. In Towards Agentic AI for Science: Hypothesis Generation, Comprehension, Quantification, and Validation (eds Koutra, D. et al.) (2025).
Tang, X. et al. CellForge: agentic design of digital cell fashions. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Turcan, A., Huang, Okay., Li, L. & Zhang, M. J. TusoAI: agentic optimization for scientific strategies. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Huang, Okay. et al. Biomni: a general-purpose biomedical AI agent. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Lu, C. et al. The AI Scientist: in the direction of absolutely automated open-ended scientific discovery. Preprint at arXiv (2024).
Yamada, Y. et al. Scientist-v2: workshop-level automated scientific discovery by way of agentic tree search. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Ferrag, M. A., Tihanyi, N. & Debbah, M. From LLM reasoning to autonomous AI brokers: a complete assessment. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Yehudai, A. et al. Survey on analysis of LLM-based brokers. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Geva, M. et al. Did Aristotle use a laptop computer? A query answering benchmark with implicit reasoning methods. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 9, 346–361 (2021).
Chan, J. S. et al. MLE-bench: evaluating machine studying brokers on machine studying engineering. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) 50466–50494 (2025).
Li, Y. et al. Competition-level code technology with AlphaCode. Science 378, 1092–1097 (2022).
Jimenez, C. E. et al. SWE-bench: can language fashions resolve real-world Github points? In Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Kim, B. et al.) 54107–54157 (2024).
Chen, Z. et al. ScienceAgentBench: towards rigorous evaluation of language brokers for data-driven scientific discovery. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) 96934–96990 (2025).
Tian, M. et al. SciCode: a analysis coding benchmark curated by scientists. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track Vol. 111 (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 30624–30650 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Srivastava, A. et al. Beyond the imitation recreation: quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language fashions. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (2023).
Jin, D. et al. What illness does this affected person have? A big-scale open area query answering dataset from medical exams. Appl. Sci. 11, 6421 (2021).
Pal, A., Umapathi, L. Okay. & Sankarasubbu, M. MedMCQA: a large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical area query answering. In Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning Vol. 174 (eds Flores, G. et al.) 248–260 (PMLR, 2022).
Lou, R. et al. AAAR-1.0: assessing AI’s potential to help analysis. In Proceedings of the forty second International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 267 (eds Singh, A. et al.) 40361–40383 (PMLR, 2025).
Webber, B., Cohn, T., He, Y. & Liu, Y. (eds). Fact or fiction: verifying scientific claims. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 7534–7550 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Laurent, J. M. et al. LAB-Bench: measuring capabilities of language fashions for biology analysis. Preprint at arXiv (2024).
Bragg, J. et al. AstaBench: rigorous benchmarking of AI brokers with a scientific analysis suite. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Akhtar, M. et al. Croissant: a metadata format for ML-ready datasets. In Proceedings of the eighth Workshop on Data Management for End-to-End Machine Learning (eds Hulsebos, M., Interlandi, M., & Shankar, S.) 1–6 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024).
Holmes, J. H. et al. Why is the digital well being report so difficult for analysis and medical care? Methods Inf. Med. 60, 32–48 (2021).
Chen, Y. & Esmaeilzadeh, P. Generative AI in medical follow: in-depth exploration of privateness and safety challenges. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e53008 (2024).
European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the safety of pure individuals with regard to the processing of non-public knowledge and on the free motion of such knowledge, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016).
U.S. Congress. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 42 U.S.C. 201 notice. (1996).
Science and Technology Policy Office. Blueprint for an AI invoice of rights: making automated techniques work for the American individuals. (2022).
Das, B. C., Amini, M. H. & Wu, Y. Security and privateness challenges of enormous language fashions: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 152:1–152:39 (2025).
Chen, Z., Xiang, Z., Xiao, C., Song, D. & Li, B. AgentPoison: red-teaming LLM brokers by way of poisoning reminiscence or information bases. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 37 (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 130185–130213 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Buniello, A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of revealed genome-wide affiliation research, focused arrays and abstract statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1005–D1012 (2019).
Benson, D. A. et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D36–D42 (2013).
Husom, E. J., Goknil, A., Shar, L. Okay. & Sen, S. The worth of prompting: profiling power use in giant language fashions inference. Preprint at arXiv (2024).
Maliakel, P. J., Ilager, S. & Brandic, I. Investigating power effectivity and efficiency trade-offs in LLM inference throughout duties and DVFS settings. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Jiang, P., Sonne, C., Li, W., You, F. & You, S. Preventing the immense improve within the life-cycle power and carbon footprints of LLM-powered clever chatbots. Engineering 40, 202–210 (2024).
Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A. & Ren, S. Making AI much less ‘thirsty’. Commun. ACM 68, 54–61 (2025).
Zhang, H., Ning, A., Prabhakar, R. B. & Wentzlaff, D. LLMCompass: enabling environment friendly {hardware} design for big language mannequin inference. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE 51st Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) (eds Vega, A. et al.) 1080–1096 (IEEE, 2024).
Barocas, S., Hardt, M. & Narayanan, A. Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities (The MIT Press, 2023).
Chang, C. T. et al. Red teaming ChatGPT in medication to yield real-world insights on mannequin conduct. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 149 (2025).
Chen, R. J. et al. Algorithmic equity in synthetic intelligence for medication and healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 719–742 (2023).
Omar, M. et al. Sociodemographic biases in medical determination making by giant language fashions. Nat. Med. 31, 1873–1881 (2025).
OECD. Health Data Governance for the Digital Age: Implementing the OECD Recommendation on Health Data Governance (OECD Publishing, 2022).
Zhang, C. et al. A survey on federated studying. Knowl.-Based Syst. 216, 106775 (2021).
Li, R., Romano, J. D., Chen, Y. & Moore, J. H. Centralized and federated fashions for the evaluation of medical knowledge. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 7, 179–199 (2024).
Pan, M. Z. et al. Why do multiagent techniques fail? In Proceedings of the ICLR 2025 Workshop on Building Trust in Language Models and Applications (eds Goldblum, M. et al.) (2025).
Matsumoto, N. et al. ESCARGOT: an AI agent leveraging giant language fashions, dynamic graph of ideas, and biomedical information graphs for enhanced reasoning. Bioinformatics 41, btaf031 (2025).
Romano, J. D. et al. The Alzheimer’s Knowledge Base: a information graph for Alzheimer illness analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e46777 (2024).
Lobentanzer, S. et al. A platform for the biomedical utility of enormous language fashions. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 166–169 (2025).
Lobentanzer, S. et al. Democratizing information illustration with BioCypher. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1056–1059 (2023).
Zhou, J. et al. Large language fashions in biomedicine and healthcare. NPJ Artif. Intell. 1, 44 (2025).
Gulcehre, C. et al. Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for language modeling. Preprint at arXiv (2023).
Gabriel, I., Keeling, G., Manzini, A. & Evans, J. We want a brand new ethics for a world of AI brokers. Nature 644, 38–40 (2025).
Lee, H.-P. (Hank) et al. The affect of generative AI on vital pondering: self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence results from a survey of data staff. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds Yamashita, N. et al.) 1–22 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2025).
Del Rio-Chanona, R. M., Ernst, E., Merola, R., Samaan, D. & Teutloff, O. AI and jobs. A assessment of concept, estimates, and proof. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Becker, J., Rush, N., Barnes, E. & Rein, D. Measuring the affect of early-2025 AI on skilled open-source developer productiveness. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
SIMA Team et al. Scaling instructable brokers throughout many simulated worlds. Preprint at arXiv (2024).
Gao, S. et al. Democratizing AI scientists utilizing ToolUniverse. Preprint at arXiv (2025).
Qu, Y. et al. CRISPR-GPT for agentic automation of gene-editing experiments. Nat. Biomed. Eng. (2025).
Bran, A. M. et al. Augmenting giant language fashions with chemistry instruments. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 525–535 (2024).
Wang, H. et al. SpatialAgent: an autonomous AI agent for spatial biology. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. ProtAgents: protein discovery by way of giant language mannequin multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine studying. Digit. Discov. 3, 1389–1409 (2024).
Yuksekgonul, M. et al. Optimizing generative AI by backpropagating language mannequin suggestions. Nature 639, 609–616 (2025).
Yang, Y. et al. TwinMarket: a scalable behavioral and social simulation for monetary markets. In Proceedings of the ICLR 2025 Workshop on World Models: Understanding, Modelling and Scaling (eds Yang, M. et al.) (2025).
Hu, S., Lu, C. & Clune, J. Automated design of agentic techniques. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) 21344–21377 (2025).
Chiruzzo, L., Ritter, A. & Wang, L. (eds). EvoAgent: in the direction of automated multi-agent technology by way of evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1, 6192–6217 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025).
Gao, S. et al. Empowering biomedical discovery with AI brokers. Cell 187, 6125–6151 (2024).
Ahdritz, G. et al. OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its studying mechanisms and capability for generalization. Nat. Methods 21, 1514–1524 (2024).
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-026-03035-1
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you'll…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…