What are cons of gaming optimised immutable OS for basic use? – Assist

Given the touted stability and reliability of immutable OSes, why wouldn’t each immutable OS be gaming optimised with optimised kernel and so on. What are the disadvantages of such optimisations for an immutable OS?

Better efficiency — to the extent that it’s actual and never only a bunch of selling hype — advantages everybody, not simply players. For instance it may yield much less energy draw (and subsequently longer battery life) when not gaming.

The downsides of immutable gaming OSs are much like the downsides of immutable OSs usually: lowered flexibility to tinker with and customise the extremely technical base OS parts, and better complication in buying and integrating software program that’s not obtainable in a GUI app heart.

In alternate, you get advantages like higher stability and reliability, the chance for built-in OS-level rollbacks when there are issues, a extra full out-of-the field expertise, and a nicer expertise of getting and updating apps that are obtainable in a GUI app heart.

Thanks in your reply @ngraham . If there aren’t any disadvantages particular to being gaming optimised, then will KDE Linux be optimised for gaming like Bazzite claims to be?

Well, what does “gaming-optimized” imply, actually? We’d have to see if any of these particular issues make sense for KDE Linux.

Something that Bazzite does is pre-install Steam on the bottom OS. Which is sensible for a “gaming-optimized” OS. But makes much less sense for a basic goal OS, since you may get Steam your self simply sufficient.

It seems that one other thrust is their documentation which is filled with gaming-oriented matters like modding, efficiency tweaking, troubleshooting, and so on. Some of this may occasionally make sense to doc for KDE Linux too.

And so on. It would have to be decided on a case-by-case foundation.

For gaming, immutable is a boon that it has a sure inherent resistance to putting in issues on the core, which suggests efficiency. Playstation and most gaming consoles take this a/b method to a clear os improve, and works properly for a tightly managed ecosystem.

For extra basic use with or with out gaming, one destructive I preserve discovering amongst immutable os’ usually is that none actually assist built-in raid/luks. I come from an enterprise and repair supplier background so redundancy is an actual concern, and I by no means use a field with out some degree of redundancy or encryption if I can assist it, so it’s an actual situation for me.

Another is vpn use, which for those who require a selected vendor software program for a connection ala cisco/fortinet, it normally requires root-level tweaking with tun and firewall guidelines. I exploit zerotier to attach family and friends to my sport servers and storage, and it’s not at all times reduce and dry to get it working with immutable appropriately. Using Bazzite on an asus rog ally for gaming, I received zerotier on it, nevertheless it was hacky and needed to break the immutability for it.

Recently testing Universal Blue, Fedora’s immutable distro, I used to be pleasantly stunned to see it comes with tailscale by default put in which is extra mainstream than zerotier for private/buisness vpn, so it appears people are coming round to the notion.

Can you quantify this? What’s lacking from the OSs particularly to assist these?