Strauss Zelnick, the CEO of Take-Two Interactive was just lately requested in regards to the integration of AI inside video games like Grand Theft Auto 6, what its precise use case is, and what it means for artists and different builders. Surprisingly, Zelnick is not apprehensive in regards to the job safety of his artists, as a substitute he is extra involved in regards to the richest man on this planet.
“If AI were going to get rid of employment, the richest man on Earth, Elon Musk, knows a little something about AI, last time I checked,” Zelnick says throughout an interview on the Semafor World Economy 2026 panel. “He has unlimited financial resources and he has unlimited human resources and he has, apparently, an unlimited amount of ideas, he also knows his way around AI. The man works 20 hours a day, if AI were going to take anyone’s job wouldn’t it take his job, the richest guy on Earth. Wouldn’t that be like job number one for AI to take. Why is he so busy?”
“Maybe Elon Musk is indeed a simulation, it’s possible,” Zelnick provides. “I mean in fairness if you were going to choose one person who was a simulation he would be my number one choice.”
Article continues beneath
On the opposite hand, Zelnick appears to assume that AI will likely be nothing however a assist to his artists, because it acts because the heavy lifter, taking mundane jobs away from devs: “The three part strategy of Take-Two is ‘Be the most creative. Be the most innovative. Be the most efficient’ and we think AI informs all three. Briefly on creativity, anything you can do that reduces mundane work means our creators can do more exciting work.”
We’ve truly seen some builders use machine studying to chop out the busy work, similar to World of Warcraft. Franchise director John Hight previously explained that while WoW isn’t fully buying into the generative AI rush the team is prepared to use machine learning to automate certain processes. A good example of this is how 2018’s Into the Spiderverse used machine learning to assist redraw hundreds of comedian ebook ink strains on current panels.
“When I started in the videogame business which was, believe it or not, in 1993, if you wanted to create a lawn, an artist had to create individual blades of grass otherwise it would look like concrete,” Zelnick continues. “Today, pre-AI, if one of my artists, and I have many thousands of them, want to create a lawn, they press the lawn button, and AI does that on steroids.
“So what does that imply? That doesn’t imply that every one of my artists are out of labor. No, they will not be out of labor, they will be doing larger high quality work, they do not care about lawns anymore, they care about this unimaginable creature.”
This idea that artists will be able to focus on the bigger picture or more complex issues is not wholly reassuring. The interview even posits the question of what happens when AI evolves to have a “creature button”, basically swallowing up much more inventive jobs.
To this Zelnick replies: “The creature button is going to take data using AI which is backward-looking and we need to make creatures that are forward-looking to make hits. And so our creators have to do that.”
That’s all nicely and good for Take Two, however there is no assure all publishers can have the identical tips and can favour ahead considering human-made artwork over mass manufactured designs that are cheaper and sooner to create. The gaming trade’s monitor file is not precisely reassuring.
But Zelnick nonetheless stays agency in his opinion that AI will not truly rob artists of their jobs: “For those of you who think you’re going to be made unemployed by AI, two things: technology creates productivity, productivity creates GDP, GDP creates more employment. Remember the paperless office? We were promised because of digital technology we’d have a paperless office. We use more paper in offices today than ever before.”
To spherical all of it off, Zelnick asks another query: “And by the way, why am I working harder than ever despite the fact that I’ve totally accepted AI into every part of my life?”
Perhaps it is as a result of many present AI instruments aren’t truly meant to assist productiveness. They’re extra a Trojan horse whose sole use case is to worm its means into each a part of our day no matter effectivity, as a result of it is developed by individuals who have wager an excessive amount of cash and their very own skilled credentials on its success, and something aside from full infiltration would not be sufficient to justify the fee spent. But I do not know, that is only a thought.