NYC Gallery Sold an AI-Generated Ansel Adams Photo Without Permission

The New York Danziger Gallery displayed on the market an AI-generated model of Ansel Adams’ picture “Moonrise Over Hernandez” with out consulting the photographer’s belief, successfully stealing the legendary artist’s work and dramatically altering it with AI for the sake of revenue.

The work, which could be seen above, is described as “A.I. Generated” from the immediate “Make a realistic color version of Ansel Adams’ iconic ‘Moonrise Over Hernandez’.” It is additional described as “Proofed, regenerated, & photoshopped from 11/25 – 4/26. Printed by master printer Esteban Mauchi Editions of 10 in 3 sizes – 20 x 24” , 24 x 30”, 30 x 40.’”

The picture was a part of The Photography Show on the Park Avenue Armory in New York City, which ran from April 22 by means of April 26, 2026. Images offered at this present up to now usually price within the tens of hundreds of {dollars}.

Ansel Adam’s belief printed a public statement on Instagram over the weekend, confirming that regardless of its finest efforts at communication, the Danziger Gallery used Adams’ identify and his picture for industrial functions with out its permission.

“The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights and asking for the work to be removed,” the Ansel Adams Trust says. At the time of publication, the Gallery has not made a proper assertion on the matter.

---

‘A gross failure of ethical and professional judgment.’
– The Ansel Adams Trust

---

“Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colorization venture involving other artists’ estates.”

Curiously, as ArtNews points out, the Trust doesn’t appear to have a specific challenge with the usage of AI, however the course of (or lack thereof) that the Danziger Gallery went about commercializing the picture.

“Ansel was an innovator who expanded the expressive and technical possibilities of his medium. He was remarkably prescient about—and excited by—the potential of computers to transform photography. The Trust’s concerns are not about AI or creative experimentation in the abstract,” the Trust explains.

“This is fundamentally about artists’ rights and moral rights—and respect for human dignity. No one should trade on another person’s name, reputation, and labor for private commercial ends without consent and candor. The unauthorized exploitation of Ansel’s actively stewarded legacy reflects a gross failure of ethical and professional judgment.”

The offending picture is still listed on the Danziger Gallery website regardless of the Trust’s requires its elimination.

“Few figures fought harder than Ansel to secure photography’s place as fine art, or contributed more to the cultural conditions that gave rise to today’s photography market. That this episode occurred at AIPAD is especially egregious and disheartening,” the Trust concludes.

The Danziger Gallery didn’t instantly reply to PetaPixel‘s request for remark.

---

Image credit: Header picture by way of the Danziger Gallery. As it’s AI-generated, it’s ineligible for copyright safety.