Categories: Lifestyle

Potential longitudinal observational research at an educational medical centre of life-style and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or listening to assist: research protocol

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/16/5/e119219
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

  • The use of real-world ecological momentary evaluation outcomes will generate significant proof for personalised suggestions to minimise age-related listening to loss (ARHL)-related cognitive decline.

  • Lab-based audiometric exams, complete neuropsychological testing and patient-reported outcomes of social isolation, loneliness, melancholy, anxiousness and high quality of life will improve understanding of the connection between listening to loss and cognitive decline.

  • The research dataset will likely be leveraged for precision medication, medical decision-support and knowledge sharing, with predictive fashions of outcomes (utilizing cochlear implants (Implants) or listening to aids (HAs)) for people and affected person subgroups.

  • Randomisation and blinding are usually not possible as it will be unethical to impose a extra invasive implant process on sufferers selecting HAs, and the machine kind is obvious to review employees and members.

  • Lack of randomisation raises concern that the selection of Implant or HA could also be associated to cognition.

Introduction

Age-related listening to loss (ARHL) is a results of cumulative, gradual results of ageing on the auditory system and is current in two-thirds of adults older than 70 years.1 2 Hearing aids (HA) are the most typical intervention for listeners with mild-to-moderately-severe listening to loss (HL), regardless of not being coated by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the USA and most non-public insurance coverage. HA adherence is an issue, with much less adherence in these with dementia and decrease socioeconomic standing.3–5 In distinction, cochlear implants (Implants) are indicated for these with moderate-to-profound sensorineural HL who obtain restricted profit from HAs and are coated by CMS and probably the most non-public insurance coverage.

Many HA customers obtain inadequate profit attributable to HL severity or aetiology. HAs fail to handle the broken cochlea, whereas implants immediately stimulate the auditory nerve, enhancing audibility in moderate-to-profound HL. Fewer than 10% of implant-qualifying HL sufferers get Implants.6 7 Implant uptake is proscribed attributable to restricted understanding of current Implant candidacy standards, amongst healthcare suppliers who’ve restricted expertise with Implant sufferers (ie, HA audiologists, main care suppliers), in addition to the requirement for surgical procedure, the complexity of care supply and an inadequate variety of implant clinics.6 7

Older adults are at elevated threat for cognitive decline, and rising proof hyperlinks HL with cognitive impairment.2 5 8 9 The 2017 Lancet Commission for Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care meta-analysis reported HL has the best relative dementia threat (1.9) of 9 modifiable threat variables.9 The 2020 Lancet Commission reported that eliminating HL threat lowered dementia prevalence by 8% amongst 12 modifiable threat variables.5 In a potential trial of 639 adults with regular cognition, 58 developed dementia over 12 years (64% Alzheimer’s). Baseline HL severity extremely predicted dementia threat (HR 1.9–4.9).10 A longitudinal ageing research (N=1515) confirmed baseline HL elevated the chance of delicate cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia (HR 2.3).11

The outcomes of research of HA effectiveness to stop cognitive decline are combined.12–19 Longitudinal research present HAs alleviated ARHL-related cognitive decline, dementia and cognitive dysfunction.12–19 In a Danish population-based research (N=573 088) with 23 023 dementia circumstances over 8.6 (SD 4.3) years,20 HL elevated dementia threat (HR 1.07), extreme HL confirmed larger threat (HR 1.13–1.20) and dementia threat was larger with HL with out HAs (HR 1.20). In distinction, an 11-year observational research demonstrated no distinction in cognitive deterioration between HAs and non-HAs.15 The ACHIEVE research (Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders) examined whether or not HAs lowered cognitive decline in seniors with untreated HL and no cognitive impairment.21 22 When HAs have been in contrast with a well being training management, 3-year cognitive change was not statistically completely different between the teams. A prespecified sensitivity evaluation confirmed that HAs might cut back cognitive decline in older adults at elevated threat of cognitive decline, with decrease baseline cognitive scores and larger cardiovascular threat elements.23 ARHL can be linked to frailty, falls, social isolation, late-onset melancholy and useful incapacity24 25 and an ACHIEVE secondary evaluation discovered that HAs lowered loneliness and social isolation after 3 years.26

Few research have examined Implant results on cognition. Small longitudinal research exhibit Implants forestall dementia and enhance language, reminiscence, consideration and communication.27 A current systematic overview and meta-analysis described eight research (N=126 903) of the results of HAs and Implants on cognitive decline and dementia.28 In these utilizing Implants or HAs, long-term cognitive decline threat dropped 19% and cognition improved 3%. Subgroup evaluation by listening to restorative machine confirmed these findings remained vital with Implants however not HAs. HAs and Implants might enhance ARHL-related cognitive impairment by lowering listening effort and stimulating auditory neural circuitry.29

The Age-Related Cognition and Hearing (ARCH) research is a 3-year potential observational comparative cohort research evaluating Implants and HAs to cut back ARHL-related cognitive decline, based mostly on significant real-time outcomes of: (1) listening setting context (eg, indoor/outside, one-on-one, group interplay); (2) auditory perform (eg, listening effort, speech notion); (3) cognitive perform (eg, consideration, processing pace, multi-tasking) and (4) hearing-related psychosocial well-being (eg, social isolation, loneliness, melancholy).

Study aims

The ARCH trial compares the results of Implants and HAs on cognitive impairment utilizing real-world outcomes. The particular goals are to: (1) evaluate the cross-sectional associations of Implants versus HAs on real-world outcomes in ARHL with regular cognition, (2) evaluate the longitudinal results of Implants versus HAs with and with out baseline cognitive impairment on cognitive perform and (3) deploy research knowledge in our visible analytics platform for predictive modelling, medical decision-support and knowledge sharing. Implant use is predicted to point out larger enchancment than HAs on: (1) cross-sectionally, ecological momentary evaluation (EMA) outcomes of auditory perform, cognitive efficiency, social interplay and psychological well-being and (2) longitudinally, cognitive efficiency and fewer cognitive decline as measured by EMA cognitive gadgets and neuropsychological testing in these with baseline MCI.

Methods and evaluation

Design and members

ARCH is a non-randomised, managed, single-centre, repeated-measure, potential observational comparative cohort research of 210 older adults. There are six research subgroups (N=35; table 1) with: (1) reasonable to profound HL or age-typical regular listening to, (2) use of implants or HAs and (c) MCI or regular cognition. Groups 1 and three are individuals who have an Implant in a single or each ears. Groups 2 and 4 goal people who find themselves implant candidates (assembly audiological candidacy for implantation by CMS) with insufficient profit from greatest fitted HAs who naturally selected to retain HAs. Groups 5 and 6 have regular age-typical listening to.30 Each listening to group has both regular cognition (teams 1, 2 and 5) or MCI (teams 3, 4, and 6).

All teams will likely be adopted longitudinally for 3 years, with research assessments (table 2) carried out at baseline and yearly, for a complete of 4 periods. Each session consists of two visits, separated by 1 week (figure 1).

Table 2

Summary of research assessments, together with measures, evaluation time required, strategy and administration web site

Figure 1

Description of ARCH research session. Each session contains two on-site visits (go to 1 and go to 2) and off-site real-time EMA surveys and PROMs. At research finish, members full a complete of 4 periods (baseline and yearly for 3 years). ARCH, Age-Related Cognition and Hearing Study; EMA, ecological momentary evaluation; NACC-FAS, National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Functional Assessment Scale; PROMs, patient-reported final result measures.

Recruitment and eligibility standards

Participants are community-dwelling, older adults recruited from the University of Iowa Cochlear Implant Hearing Registry, Otolaryngology Clinic, Brain Boosters Cognitive Enhancement Programme, Seniors Together in Aging Research Registry, HA retailers, and retirement and senior centres. Participants with regular listening to are recruited from ads, e mail teams or Implant/HA members’ households or buddies. ARCH recruitment started in May 2025 with completion anticipated by July 2029.

Eligibility standards are: (1) ≥65 years of age at enrolment, (2) grownup onset HL, (3) English as main language, (4) entry to Android or iPhone cell phone, (5) willingness to journey to University of Iowa, (6) useful independence (rating ≤8 on National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Functional Assessment Scale (NACC-FAS)), (7) absence of psychiatric/behavioural points that would have an effect on research assessments and (8) use of HAs for no less than 6 months or Implant(s) for ≥1 yr and <10 years.

Groups 1 and three (Implant teams) have unilateral or bilateral implants. For these with unilateral implants, the non-implanted ear wants Hearing Number (HN)31 ≥50 dB HL and minimally no less than one pure-tone air conduction threshold ≥70 dB HL. HN is pure-tone air conduction threshold common at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz. To align the HA teams, teams 2 and 4 meet CMS pointers for protection for cochlear implants. These members want bilateral moderate-to-profound HL in each ears with one ear’s HN≥60 dB HL and contralateral ear’s HN≥50 dB HL, no less than one pure-tone air conduction threshold ≥70 dB HL and phrase scores ≤60% within the poorer ear. Groups 4 and 5 want age-typical listening to in each ears.30 Table 3 gives a abstract of the inclusion standards.

Table 3

Study inclusion standards

This research is permitted by the Universities of Iowa and Maryland Institutional Review Boards. Participants should present knowledgeable consent as outlined by the Evaluation to Sign Consent (ESC) to make sure understanding of analysis actions. Participants who fail the ESC are excluded. Participants are compensated with US$200 for session completion with a most of US$800 at completion of 4 periods (figure 1). Participants who don’t meet inclusion standards at preliminary screening are compensated US$10.

Determination of MCI

MCI is outlined as: (1) cognitive change reported by affected person, informant or clinician, (2) goal proof of impairment in ≥1 cognitive area and (3) basic preservation of perform.

MCI is decided based mostly on a standardised battery of cognitive exams encompassing a number of domains (table 2). MCI standards are: (1) the rating on ≥2 duties in ≥1 cognitive area is >1.5 SD beneath estimated premorbid mental perform, as assessed by the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-5) and (2) NACC-FAS reveals impartial perform (rating ≤8).

Study assessments

Study assessments are in 4 classes: (1) auditory setting; (2) auditory perform; (3) cognitive perform; (4) psychosocial well-being. There are three kinds of research outcomes knowledge: (1) retrospective patient-reported final result measures (PROMs): recollection of listening experiences, cognitive skill, psychological well-being, social engagement and bodily perform; (2) real-time PROMs: reporting from the participant’s pure setting (EMA surveys); and (3) laboratory efficiency: (a) audiometry and speech notion and (b) neuropsychological assessments (table 2).

Ecological momentary evaluation

Our expertise with EMA methodologies for listening to impairment contains publication of a complete statistical information to EMA knowledge32 and documenting feasibility in Implant customers, together with these with MCI.33 We additionally developed AudioSense+34 35 to facilitate EMA administration on a smartphone within the participant’s pure setting. For 1 week throughout every of 4 research periods, members full ≥5 surveys per day, triggered by pinged notifications or self-initiated studies (figure 1). AudioSense+ adaptively delivers questions, with every subsequent query contingent on the earlier response. Each survey requires 2–3 min. Users reply to inquiries to report their present or very current expertise (online supplemental table).

Neuropsychological testing

Neuropsychological testing is carried out by a skilled technician beneath the supervision of two board-certified neuropsychologists. To restrict apply results, members obtain alternate check kinds yearly, the place potential. Cognitive assessments (table 2) embrace: (1) goal evaluation of cognitive domains, together with conventional exams with standardised verbal directions and supplemental auditory stimuli with visible cues tailored for listening to impairment and (2) subjective evaluation tailored from the PROMIS Cognitive Function-Abilities Short Form, administered with real-time EMA.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Hearing Impairment (MoCA-HI) characterises international cognitive standing for comparability to prior literature. In MoCA-HI, the examiner reveals flashcards with written directions and instructs the participant to learn the directions out loud earlier than completion. The WRAT-5 Reading Standard Score is used to estimate premorbid mental perform. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for people with listening to impairment was modified by offering PowerPoint prompts to reinforce comprehension (RBANS-H). In our additional modification, a neuropsychologist gives verbal directions with closed-captioning in PowerPoint (RBANS-HI).

Primary final result

The main final result measure is EMA knowledge, assessing real-time, real-world patient-reported outcomes. Diverse EMA outcomes characterise wealthy ecological profiles of auditory perform, cognitive efficiency, listening setting, social interplay and psychosocial well-being, which will likely be used to review how interactions between listening to and life-style impression cognition and the way interactions between listening to and cognition impression life-style.

Secondary outcomes

Secondary outcomes embrace cognitive area scores (reminiscence, govt perform, language, consideration/working reminiscence, processing pace, visuospatial perform), audiometry, speech notion and retrospective PROMs (social isolation, loneliness, anxiousness, melancholy and hearing-specific high quality of life).

Deploying knowledge in our visible analytics platform

Study knowledge will likely be deployed in our user-friendly visible analytics platform, POD-Vis (Probing Outcomes Data with Visual Analytics; figure 2).36 POD-Vis performs conventional knowledge analyses, hypothesis-generating visualisations and predictive modelling for medical choice assist. POD-Vis is an online utility constructed utilizing trendy JavaScript and Python libraries (VueJS, NumPy and Pandas). POD-Vis capabilities embrace: (1) deciding on particular predictors and final result variables to create knowledge queries; (2) filtering research populations to create customised cohorts; (3) utilizing knowledge visualisations to know distributions and evaluate results on completely different final result variables; (4) performing instantaneous analyses for iterative knowledge exploration and (5) predicting outcomes for particular person sufferers based mostly on pre-built fashions. Machine studying (ML) analyses will increase conventional analyses to leverage the worth of the advanced real-world and standard knowledge collected on this research and will likely be democratised by embedding them inside the easy-to-use POD-Vis interface.

Figure 2

POD-Vis. A instrument for visualising medical variables and constructing queries based mostly on predictor and final result variables. It contains 5 principal screens: (1) house web page, (2) create new research dataset, (3) use a beforehand saved dataset, (4) research group selector—to filter predictor and final result variables to create comparative research teams (eg, feminine/male, extra incapacity/much less incapacity) and (5) knowledge analytics—to analyse the chosen research teams with field plots, longitudinal graphs and regression analyses. The determine is a abstract view of chosen analyses exhibiting that males and older topics have worse illness severity and cognitive perform over time in a Parkinson’s illness cohort. POD-Vis, Probing Outcomes Data with Visual Analytics.

Covariates

Participant intercourse, age at enrolment, race, ethnicity, training, premorbid mental perform, HL aetiology, HL period/onset, amplification/implant historical past and machine datalogging (if relevant) are documented. Medical comorbidities and life modifications (eg, change of house, retirement, dying of member of the family) will likely be documented. These variables will likely be adjusted for analyses and used as predictor variables in predictive fashions.

Statistical evaluation

Aim 1: cross-sectional analyses

We need to know if group variations, unrelated to cognitive perform, clarify EMA variance. EMA survey responses are the important thing final result metrics in these cross-sectional analyses. Since EMA gadgets are correlated with one another to varied levels, EMA questions will likely be mixed right into a smaller variety of EMA domains (online supplemental table). An exploratory issue evaluation of Psychosocial Wellbeing and Environment gadgets from prior EMA analysis confirmed seven elements defined 52% of EMA variance (unpublished knowledge). Factor evaluation of the research knowledge, together with EMA Cognitive gadgets, will create participant issue scores. Each issue rating would be the dependent variable in a number of linear regression fashions. Group would be the key impartial variable in every mannequin as a result of the purpose is to check research teams. Sex is a organic variable for differentiation. We will regulate for medical comorbidities and cognitive perform within the fashions to find out if group variations clarify variation not defined by cognitive perform.

When substantial group variations in an EMA issue are discovered, we are going to decide which EMA merchandise is accountable. Thus, the regression mannequin’s specific EMA merchandise (eg, Auditory Function, Psychosocial, Cognition) turns into the result variable at this step. Group, cognitive perform and intercourse fastened results will likely be included within the mannequin. A linear combined mannequin (LMM) with a random intercept for topic is used to account for a number of EMA merchandise responses per participant. Pairwise comparisons between the six teams will likely be carried out utilizing a Tukey adjustment to regulate for a number of comparisons. Secondary analyses will use a number of regression fashions with cognitive perform because the dependent variable. Group, with intercourse changes, is the important thing impartial variable.

ML analyses will complement the statistical analyses. These analyses will largely deal with supervised studying for predicting outcomes reminiscent of EMA response. ML modelling will allow: (1) prediction of Implant versus HA outcomes for people or subgroups, (b) quantification of variable significance for chosen outcomes and (c) unsupervised studying to determine frequent trajectories and patterns.

Aim 2: longitudinal analyses

Analysis #1. LMMs will consider how EMA issue scores change over time. Within-subject fastened results will likely be time, and between-subject fastened results will likely be cognitive perform and listening to/machine (six teams). A random intercept for participant and a random slope for time are anticipated; nonetheless, different random results and correlation matrices will likely be evaluated to seek out one of the best mannequin match. We will use hierarchical analysis to guage if group change in EMA issue scores over time differs by group. Models will account for medical comorbidities, training and intercourse. Group comparisons will likely be carried out at every time level utilizing mannequin estimates to find out when group moderates change in EMA.

Subsequent evaluation will decide which EMA questions inside the recognized issue have group variations based mostly on EMA issue scores. Similar to intention 1, LMMs will likely be created utilizing uncooked EMA knowledge, accounting for a number of responses per merchandise at every time level and integrating the identical fastened elements.

Analysis #2. Hierarchical LMMs will research how real-world elements have an effect on cognition and ARHL. Cognition would be the final result variable, with time, group membership, and a random intercept for members as fastened results. Hierarchically utilizing EMA, we look at how real-world elements mediate cognitive modifications and clarify MCI variance.

Analysis #3. PROMs will likely be in comparison with lab knowledge. The settlement between retrospective PROMs and real-time EMA questions (dependent variable) to laboratory-based assessments (impartial variable) will likely be examined, evaluating EMA and retrospective PROMs with (1) in-lab efficiency on goal cognitive exams and (2) laboratory auditory perform exams.

This research collects longitudinal knowledge and a few members in every group might drop-out. While the coordinator and investigator will encourage participation in closing knowledge assortment, dropouts will end in lacking knowledge. Based on prior analysis, the attrition price is predicted to be beneath 5%; we account for 10% to make sure a adequate pattern measurement.

Sample measurement

Aim 1: the first query is a two-group pairwise comparability between impartial teams. We consider energy utilizing a two-independent samples t-test, though the regression evaluation that controls for extra variation ought to have extra energy than the t-test. The final result variable is the issue rating from one of many EMA elements. Factor scores have an SD of 1 and we want to detect half a SD impact between the 2 teams. We have 80% energy to detect an impact of Cohen’s d=0.71 with 32 members per group on the 5% significance stage. Our prior work reveals that the identical pattern measurement will yield roughly 88% energy for the LMM evaluation strategy based mostly on 1000 simulated datasets.32

Aim 2: we anticipate that EMA responses within the Implant/MCI group, HA/MCI group and NH/MCI group will present modifications over time at completely different charges. We will assess whether or not a distinction of d=0.5 exists on the closing follow-up interval, utilizing N=32 for every of the six teams. Our evaluation signifies roughly 95% energy with 1000 simulated datasets to detect a within-group change of d=0.5, utilizing pattern measurement of N=32 at a 5% significance stage, and an approximate 84% energy to detect a between-group change of d=0.7 with a pattern measurement of N=32 at a 5% significance stage. Recruitment goal for every group has been elevated to N=35 to ensure an ample pattern measurement.

Data administration and sharing plan

ARCH research knowledge will likely be preserved and shared to permit different researchers to breed the info and acquire extra findings to advance the sphere. A novel function of this research is the usage of the visible analytics instrument, POD-Vis, to allow large-scale data-sharing, together with predictive fashions exhibiting the relative effectiveness of HAs or Implants on cognitive perform based mostly on particular person profiles (precision medication). The analysis neighborhood can have entry to ARCH knowledge uploaded in POD-Vis for medical care and analysis. Data sharing will embrace: (1) subscale and international scores of PROMs, (2) uncooked and standardised scoring measurements from neuropsychological exams and (3) deidentified demographic knowledge. Audiological knowledge (unaided thresholds) will likely be offered of their unique type.

Data preservation and sharing will likely be facilitated within the well-established repository, the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Discussion

Dementia is a serious international well being downside with rising prevalence and societal prices related to the rising aged inhabitants.37–40 The Lancet Commission report identifies HL as probably the most modifiable threat issue for dementia.5 In response, ARCH responds to the need for analysis on listening to interventions, together with HAs and Implants, to cut back threat and deal with cognitive impairment related to ARHL. ARCH is a big potential longitudinal comparative trial investigating AHRL-related cognitive impairment in members utilizing both HAs or Implants.

The randomised managed trial, ACHIEVE, examined the efficacy of HAs in lowering cognitive decline amongst members with age-related delicate to reasonable HL and with out vital cognitive impairment. The research didn’t exhibit a big distinction between HAs and a well being training management. However, a prespecified sensitivity evaluation indicated that HAs might cut back cognitive decline within the subgroup characterised by larger age and decrease baseline cognitive scores.21–23 In distinction, ARCH targets a inhabitants with reasonable to profound baseline HL who presently have an implant or who’re a candidate for an implant. Participant teams are divided into these with and with out MCI. These elements (extra extreme HL41 and MCI42–45) are related to a larger threat of extra fast cognitive decline over the 3-year research interval. Older adults with age-typical listening to, each with and with out MCI, perform as management topics. ARCH’s main final result measures are the EMA surveys, assessing real-time cognitive and auditory outcomes, together with the normal cognitive and audiology measures.

On its completion in 2029, ARCH is predicted to yield vital proof concerning the comparative results of two main listening to interventions, Implants and HAs, to delay and ameliorate cognitive decline related to ARHL.

Ethics and dissemination

All research procedures adhere to moral requirements set by institutional overview boards and the Declaration of Helsinki via the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board (IRB# 202403385). Participants present knowledgeable consent previous to enrolment, with extra procedures in place to make sure decisional capability and comprehension amongst people with MCI. Data confidentiality is ensured via safe, encrypted knowledge seize, privacy-preserving EMA protocols and de-identification of all shared datasets. Continuous threat–profit monitoring is performed all through the 3-year research, together with oversight of withdrawal procedures, hostile psychological responses and device-related issues. Ethical safeguards guarantee participant autonomy, safety of weak adults and accountable stewardship of delicate real-world listening to and cognitive knowledge. Patients and members of the general public weren’t concerned within the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this analysis.

Study findings will likely be disseminated via a multi-tiered technique aimed toward maximising scientific, medical and public well being impression. Peer-reviewed manuscripts will likely be submitted to main journals in audiology, geriatrics, cognitive ageing and public well being, with interim and closing outcomes offered at worldwide conferences {and professional} society conferences. Summaries tailor-made for clinicians, business companions and policymakers will likely be developed to assist translation of proof into hearing-health interventions and dementia-risk discount methods.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/16/5/e119219
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us

fooshya

Recent Posts

Chinese GPU maker sells out over 30,000 gaming GPUs inside 48 hours regardless of lukewarm benchmarks — LX 7G100 proves hype trumps efficiency

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…

7 minutes ago

Former SNP chief admits embezzling £400K to ‘bankroll lavish way of life’

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…

9 minutes ago

The Story Behind The Final Photograph of Oscar Wilde on His Dying Mattress

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…

13 minutes ago

Pool Water Clarity: Pool Water Clarity Matters for Safe Swimming

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you'll…

18 minutes ago

Travel Healthcare Extensions: When to Keep or Move On

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you'll…

21 minutes ago

Why Stablecoins Are Reshaping International Enterprise

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…

25 minutes ago