Categories: Lifestyle

A Systematic Evaluate of Lifestyle Interventions for Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain: Alcohol Consumption and Avoidance

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13297589/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us


Adler (1997) [12] Cohort Study US With Ne: 58; Without Ne: 230 With Ne: 1:57; Without Ne: 11:219 With Ne: 64.0; Without Ne: 61.5 DM ± Incident Ne Alcohol: CAGE rating, historical past of remedy, present use High (4) CAGE alcohol rating considerably related to incident Ne (41.7% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.049; β = 1.94, SE = 0.7281, 6.96 [1.67–28.99], p = 0.008). Braffett (2020) [13] Cohort Study US With DPN: 455; Without DPN: 931 With DPN: 182:273; Without DPN: 475:456 ^ With DPN: 29 (24, 34); Without DPN 26 (21, 32) T1DM ± DPN Occasional or common alcohol use Alcohol consumption not considerably related to DPN (1.14 [0.93–1.41], p > 0.05). Christensen (2020) [14] Cohort Study Denmark Overall: 5249; With DPoN: 938; With DPoN + Pain: 386 Overall: 2205:3144 ^ 65 (57, 72) T2DM ± DPoN ± Pain Alcohol: ≤14 (F)/21 (M) models, >14 (F)/21 (M) models Alcohol consumption above really helpful restrict considerably related to elevated ache prevalence (aPR: 1.31 [1.01–1.69]. Elgendy (2019) [15] Cohort Study Canada 1413 705:708 60 ± 8.4 T2DM ± PN Alcohol frequency: Never, ≤1/mo, 2–4/mo, 2–3/wk, ≥4/wk; Number of drinks/d High alcohol frequency + depressive signs considerably related to prevalent Ne (1.02 [1.00–1.04], p = 0.04). Ellis (2020) [16] Cohort Study US 254 54:200 43.5 ± 8.01 HIV ± DSPoN Lifetime Alcohol Abuse: Yes, No Lifetime alcohol abuse not considerably related to DSPoN (statistics NR). Hawley (1982) [17] Cohort Study US 63 0:63 53.3 (29–69) PN on account of Alcohol History of alcoholism Alcohol abstinence related to important electrophysiology enchancment in PN (+0.12 m/s/abstinent mo, p < 0.05). Hillbom (1984) [18] Cohort Study Sweden 10 0:10 53.1 (38–72) Chronic alcoholism ± PN History of alcoholism and in search of rehabilitation Alcohol abstinence related to enchancment in medical/electrophysiological PN. Iturralde (2024) [19] Cohort Study US Overall: 222,334; AUD+: 1998; AUD−: 220,336 Overall: 106,353:115,978; AUD+: 477:1521; AUD−: 105,876:114,457 AUD+: 57 ± 11.3; AUD−: 64.3 ± 12.7 T2DM ± AUD ± Ne AUD (sure, no) AUD considerably related to the next danger of Ne in unadjusted (p < 0.001) and adjusted (p < 0.001) fashions. Kerns (2025) [20] Cohort Study US 1 drink/d: 539; >1 drink/d: 76 0:615 45 (22–79) Testicular most cancers survivors ± worsening PSN, or NP History of alcohol consumption (1 drink/d, >1 drink/d) Alcohol consumption (>1 drink/d) not considerably related to PSN (0.75 [0.40–1.44], p = 0.392), or NP (0.76 [0.29–1.98], p = 0.570). Khan (2023) [21] Cohort Study US TUD: 8009; TAUD: 1672; PSUD: 642; TUD Co: 8009; TAUD Co: 1672; PSUD Co: 642 TUD: 4660:3349; TAUD: 582:1090; PSUD: 233:409; TUD Co: 4665:3344; TAUD Co: 584:1088; PSUD Co: 234:408 TUD: 61.6 ± 12.1; TAUD: 61.52 ± 10.3; PSUD: 57.84 ± 8.3; TUD Co: 61.6 ± 12.1; TAUD Co: 61.42 ± 10; PSUD Co: 57.88 ± 8.1 T2DM + Hypertension ± Ne TUD: Yes, No; TAUD: Yes, No; PSUD: Yes, No PSUD related to considerably increased danger of DN (1.76 [1.33–2.32], p < 0.05) in comparison with TUD. Kindl (2021)
[22] Cohort Study Germany With MSK: 255; With CRPS: 223 With MSK: 160:95; With CRPS: 173:50 With MSK: 54.6 (20–80); With CRPS: 50.9 (18–77) CRPS or MSK, on account of trauma Alcohol Consumption: Yes, No, Daily, Weekly, Monthly Prevalence of alcohol consumption important with MSK (58%, p < 0.001), and CRPS (43%, p < 0.001). Kuguyo (2024) [23] Cohort Study Zimbabwe 252 252:0 (26–90); ^ 50 (43–61) Breast most cancers survivors ± sensory loss (cisplatin) History of alcohol consumption Alcohol consumption not considerably related to diminished electrophysiology (p > 0.05). Lehtinen (1993) [24] Cohort Study Finland With ND: 12; Without ND: 101 With ND: 9:3; Without ND: 46:55 With ND: 57.2 ± 4.7; Without ND: 55.4 ± 10.4 DM ± ND Alcohol use (>30 g/wk) Alcohol use not considerably completely different between ND teams (17% vs. 30%, p > 0.05). Sreeram (2023) [25] Cohort Study US Overall: 1034; With CIPN: 704; Without CIPN: 330 Overall: 797:237; With CIPN: 570:134; Without CIPN: 227:103 Overall: 57.1 ± 10.9 (27–79); With CIPN: 55.8 ± 10.8 (27–79); Without CIPN: 59.9 ± 10.4 (27–79) Cancer survivors ± CIPN Alcohol use (Past 4 wks): Yes, No Alcohol use not considerably completely different between CIPN teams, or related to CIPN prevalence (51.2% vs. 46.4%, 1.10 [0.81–1.49], p > 0.05). Xu (2025) [26] Cohort Study China Low-Risk Stable CIPN: 148; Mod-Risk Progressive CIPN: 145; High-Risk Progressive CIPN: 57 350:0 18–44: n = 89; 45–59: n = 179; >60: n = 82 Breast most cancers survivors ± CIPN History of dangerous alcohol consumption (sure, no) History of dangerous alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between CIPN teams (1.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 1.8%, x2 = 0.225, p = 0.894). Agelink (1998) [27] Case–Control Study Germany Ca: 35; Co: 80 Ca: 15:20; Co: 33:47 Ca: 42.9 ± 10 (28–74); Co: 41.8 ± 14.7 (27–77) Alcoholism ± PN & CAN vs. wholesome co Duration of alcohol dependence (yrs), imply TLDA Duration of alcohol dependence was considerably longer (6.1 ± 3.8 vs. 16.2 ± 7.1, p < 0.0005) and imply TLDA was considerably bigger (438 ± 342 vs. 1930 ± 1173, p < 0.001) with AUD PN vs. with out. Doneddu (2020) [28] Case–Control Study Italy Ca: 195; Co: 195 Ca: 109:86; Co: 109:86 NR CIDP on account of any etiology and their companions Alcohol Consumption: Yes, No Alcohol consumption not considerably related to CIDP (0.79 [0.50–1.24], p > 0.05). Fouchard (2023) [29] Case–Control Study France Overall: 323; Ca: 162; Co: 161 Overall: 192:131; Ca: 88:74; Co: 104:57 Ca: 56 ± 16; Co: 69 ± 13 Cutaneous paresthesia ± SFN by way of IENFD on account of any etiology Alcoholism: Yes, No Alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between SFN teams (3.7% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.05). Franklin (1994) [30] Case–Control Study US Ca: 77; Co: 200 Ca: 29:48; Co: 118:82 Ca: 61.7; Co: 58.6 NIDDM ± DSN Alcohol use: by no means, g/wk (<20, >20) Alcohol (g/wk: <20, >20) not considerably related to DSN (0.71 [0.29–1.72] p = 0.69, 1.03 [0.40–2.62]). Frost (2013) [31] Case–Control Study Denmark Ca: 324; Co: 832 Ca: 121:203; Co 317:515 Ca Smokers: 49 ± 9.7; Ca Non-Smokers: 44 ± 11.5; Co Smokers: 50 ± 9; Co Non-Smokers: 48 ± 9.9 Ca: Electroneurographically confirmed UN; Co: Without UN Alcohol: u/wk Alcohol consumption not considerably related to UN (0.81 [0.44–1.48]). Gebabo (2021) [32] Case–Control Study Ethiopia Overall: 528; Ca: 264; Co: 264 Ca: 101:163; Co: 105:159 Ca: <40: 43; 40–65: 178; 65+: 43; Co: <40: 64; 40–65: 178; 65+: 17 T1DM or T2DM ± PN Alcohol Consumption (Ever): Yes, No Alcohol consumption considerably increased with PN vs. with out (5.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.024). Koike (2001) [33] Case–Control Study Japan 18 0:18 47.7 ± 10.5 (31–70) Alcoholism PoN vs. wholesome co History of heavy alcohol consumption (100 g eth/d for >10 yrs) History of heavy alcohol consumption considerably related to diminished electrophysiology (p < 0.005). Mitchell (1990) [34] Case–Control Study US IDDM: Ca: 54, Co: 56; NIDDM: Ca: 39, Co: 65 IDDM: Ca: 31:23, Co: 35:21; NIDDM: Ca: 25:14, Co: 44:21 IDDM: Ca: 36.1, Co: 32.7; NIDDM: 59.4: 39, Co: 57.7 DM ± Ne Alcohol: median drink-yrs Median alcohol consumption not considerably related to Ne in IDDM (996 vs. 485). or NIDDM (0 vs. 14). Mondelli (2020) [35] Case–Control Study Italy Ca: 220; Co: 460 Ca: 84:136; Co: 242:218 Ca: 51.7 ± 11.8; Co: 47.8 ± 12.4 Ca: UNE; Co: Upper limb complaints Alcohol: u/wk or d Alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between UNE teams (p = 0.463). Pessione (1995) [36] Case–Control Study France Ca: 32; Co: 58 Ca: 6:26; Co: 22:36 Ca: 49 ± 10.1; Co: 46.8 ± 9.6 Alcoholism ± PN Alcohol: parental historical past of alcoholism, alcohol dependence, weekly alcohol consumption (drinks) Alcohol-related danger components all considerably increased in these with PN vs. with out in univariate (p < 0.01); and multivariate p < 0.05) analyses. Richardson (2016) [37] Case–Control Study US Ca: 50; Co: 50 Ca: 18:32; Co: 34:16 Ca: 48.4 ± 12.8; Co: 39.2 ± 12 Ca: UNE+; Co: UNE- Alcohol: Eth/wk (ounces) Eth/wk didn’t considerably differ between UNE teams (1.2 ± 1.9 vs. 1.2 ± 2.2, p = 0.993). Walsh (1970) [38] Case–Control Study Australia Ca: 11; Co: 20 1:10 Ca: 58 (41–73); Co: 54 (38–73) PN on account of alcoholism History of PN on account of alcoholism: Yes, No History of heavy alcohol consumption related to diminished electrophysiology (p < 0.01), and fiber densities (3.39 ± 0.86 vs. 5.78 ± 0.90, p < 0.001). Alessi (2020) [39] Cross-Sectional Study US Overall: 934; Never Drinker: 103; Former Drinker: 89; Nonbinge Drinker: 567; Binge Drinker: 174 Overall: 569:365; Never Drinker: 61:42; Former Drinker: 51:38; Nonbinge Drinker: 373:194; Binge Drinker: 84:90 Overall: 38.3 ± 15.8; Never Drinker: 31.8 ± 16.8; Former Drinker: 44.1 ± 16.1; Nonbinge Drinker: 39.8 ± 15.8; Binge Drinker: 34 ± 13 T1DM ± PN Alcohol Consumption: Never, Former, Current (Nonbinge), Current (Binge) Ne considerably decrease in by no means vs. former alcohol consumption (11% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). Ammendola (2000) [40] Cross-Sectional with Nested Case–Control Italy 62 18:44 43.3 (28–69) Chronic alcoholism (>100 g/d for >2 yrs) ± PN Mean alcohol-related illness length; Mean TLDE Diminished electrophysiology considerably related to AUD (p < 0.01), longer illness length (p < 0.01), and better TLDE (p < 0.05). Ammendola (2001) [41] Cross-Sectional Study Italy Overall: 76; With Ne: 51; Without Ne: 25 Overall: 21:55; With Ne: 14:37; Without Ne: 7:18 Overall: 24–69; With Ne: 45.3 ± 9.4; Without Ne: 39.1 ± 7.7 Chronic alcoholism ± PN Family historical past of alcoholism (Yes, No); length of alcoholism; TLDE Prolonged alcohol-related illness length (16.2 ± 9.4 vs. 11.1 ± 8.2, p < 0.05), excessive TLDE (27.9 vs. 14.8 ± 15.9, p < 0.05), and diminished electrophysiology (p < 0.01) considerably related to Ne. Asai (2022) [42] Cross-Sectional Study Japan Overall: 817; With CP: 35; Without CP: 782 Overall: 431:386; With CP: 24:11; Without CP: 407:375 With CP: 63.91 [60.11–67.72]; Without CP: 63.75 [63.02–67.72] Chronic neck/shoulder/higher limb ache on account of any etiology Current drinker: Yes, No Alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between CP teams (42.86% vs. 47.19%, p > 0.05). Beulens (2008) [43] Cross-Sectional Study Europe 1857 893:964 (15–60) T1DM ± Ne Alcohol consumption (g/wk) Moderate alcohol consumption (30–70 g/wk)/frequency (5–7 d/wk) related to considerably decrease danger of Ne (0.61 [0.41–0.91], p < 0.01; 0.49 [0.34–0.71], p < 0.001). Blackstock (1972) [44] Cross-Sectional Study United Kingdom Chronic Alcoholism: 30; Hospital Personnel: 14 Chronic Alcoholism: 7:23; Hospital Personnel: NR Chronic Alcoholism: 44.8 (21–65); Hospital Personnel: 36.6 ± 6.9 Chronic alcoholism ± PoN vs. hospital personnel Chronic alcohol consumption/dependency Greater electrophysiological perturbation in these with AUD vs. hospital personnel (p < 0.001). Callaghan (2020) [45] Cross-Sectional Study US BMI < 35 kg—Ne: 45; BMI > 35 kg—Ne: 110; BMI > 35 kg + Ne: 28 BMI < 35 kg—Ne: 37:8; BMI > 35 kg—Ne: 87:23; BMI > 35 kg + Ne: 18:10 BMI < 35 kg—Ne: 43.8 ± 12.1; BMI > 35 kg—Ne: 43.5 ± 11.2; BMI > 35 kg + Ne: 51.4 ± 9.6 Ca: BMI > 35 kg ± Ne; Co: BMI < 25 kg
BMI < 35 kg—Ne; BMI > 35 kg—Ne; BMI > 35 kg + Ne Alcohol: drinks/wk (previous yr) Alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between Ne teams (p > 0.05). Chang (2025) [46] Cross-Sectional Study China DPN+: 163; DPN−: 107 DPN+: 69:94; DPN-: 49:58 DPN+: 67 (63–70); DPN−: 65 (62–69) Elderly T2DM ± DPN History of alcohol consumption (sure, no) Alcohol consumption not considerably correlated with DPN (p = 0.310). Chaware (2022) [47] Cross-Sectional Study India 100 0:100 39.91 Chronic alcoholism ± PN Chronic alcoholism (>60 g eth/d or >15 drinks/wk): <5 yrs, 5–15 yrs, >15 yrs Greater severity of DPN considerably related to longer consumption (<5 yrs: 21.8 ± 3.4; 5–15 yrs: 28.1 ± 3.7; >15 yrs: 33.7 ± 3.9; p = 0.001). Ching (2024) [48] Cross-Sectional Study Malaysia Overall: 1283; PN−: 943; PN+: 340 Overall: 635:648; PN−: 495:448; PN+: 140:200 40.6 ± 12.9 (18–80) Any etiology ± PN Alcohol consumption (sure, no) Alcohol consumption not considerably completely different between PN teams (18.53% vs. 19.72%, p > 0.05). Chukwubuzo (2022) [49] Cross-Sectional Study Nigeria 422 289:133 57.6 ± 10.1 T1DM or T2DM ± PN Alcohol Consumption: Yes, No Alcohol consumption not considerably related to painful DPN (1.48 [0.74–2.98], p < 0.05). Claus (1985) [50] Cross-Sectional Study Germany Chronic Alcoholism: 30; Healthy Volunteers: 30 Chronic Alcoholism: 0:30; Healthy Volunteers: 2:28 Chronic Alcoholism: 38.2 ± 6.4 (26–48); Healthy Volunteers: 34.9 ± 6 Chronic alcohol use ± PoN History of alcohol consumption (as much as >400 mL/d for five–12 yrs) Alcohol consumption (>12 yrs) considerably correlated with increased PoN frequency (p = 0.007). Electrophysiology considerably impaired vs. management (p < 0.01 for all). Correa (2023) [51] Cross-Sectional Study Brazil Overall: 444; LLBP: 313; PNBP: 33; WP: 98 Overall: 289:155; LLBP: 188:125; PNBP: 26:7; WP: 75:23 Overall: 39.72 ± 14.68; LLBP: 37.02 ± 13.39; PNBP: 8.45 ± 14.30; WP: 48.78 ± 15.59 Chronic BP on account of any etiology Alcohol Abuse: Yes, No Reported alcohol consumption: LLBP: 12.1%, PNBP: 9.1%, WP: 12.2% (statistics NR). D’Amour (1991) [52] Cross-Sectional Study Canada Chronic Alcoholism: 20; Hospital Personnel: 20 NR Chronic Alcoholism: 46 (31–67); Hospital Personnel: 38 (21–50) Chronic alcoholism ± PN vs. hospital personnel History of alcohol consumption (>10 yrs or >100 g/d) PN in 75% of AUD. Electrophysiology considerably diminished in sufferers with alcoholism vs. wholesome hospital personnel (p < 0.05). Estruch (1993) [53] Cross-Sectional Study Spain Chronic Alcoholism: 250; Healthy Volunteers: 100 Chronic Alcoholism: 0:250; Healthy Volunteers: 0:100 Chronic Alcoholism: 41 ± 11 (20–65); Healthy Volunteers: 40 ± 10 (20–65) Chronic alcoholism ± PN vs. wholesome volunteers Daily ethanol consumption (>100 g) over final 2 yrs PN current in 16% (41) of AUD. AUD + PN had increased ethanol consumption vs. these with out PN (34.7 vs. 22.4, p < 0.001); TLDE was an impartial danger issue for PN in multivariate evaluation (p < 0.001). Fernandez-Sola (1995) [54] Cross-Sectional Study Spain 100 0:100 41 ± 9 (25–60) Chronic alcoholism ± PN Daily eth consumption (g/d); length of eth consumption; TLDE PN (39% vs. 15%, p = 0.014) and TLDE (31.7 ± 17 vs. 23.3 ± 14, p = 0.01) considerably increased in these with power alcoholism + sort II fiber atrophy vs. with out. Gierthmühlen (2024) [55] Cross-Sectional Study Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Spain, UK Overall: 1181; Ne + Pain: 843; Ne − Pain: 338 Overall: 405:776; Ne + Pain: 285:558; Ne − Pain: 120:218 Overall: 65.8 ± 12 (19–92); Ne + Pain: 64.9 ± 12.4 (19–92); Ne − Pain: 68.1 ± 10.6 (19–87) Any etiology Ne ± ache Current or earlier alcohol misuse (sure, no) Prevalence of present or earlier alcohol misuse considerably decrease amongst these with ache vs. with out (6.6% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.0022). Gylfadottir (2020) [56] Cross-Sectional Study Denmark 5514 2355:3159 64.1 ± 10.9 T2DM ± DPoN Alcohol: >7 (F)/14 (M) models Alcohol consumption above really helpful restrict not considerably related to DPoN (0.94 [0.74–1.18], p > 0.05), or painful DPoN (1.09 [0.81–1.46], p > 0.05), in multivariable logistic regression. Hicks (2022) [57] Cross-Sectional Study US Overall: 6902; With PN: 1181; Without PN: 5721 Overall: 3589:3313; With PN: 443:738; Without PN: 3101:2620 % (!) 40–49: 36 (0.9); 50–59: 27.8 (0.8); 60–69: 18.2 (0.6); 70–79: 12.8 (0.4); ≥80: 5.2 (0.3) DM ± PN Alcohol: Never, Former, Current Alcohol consumption reported between PN teams: Never: 16.4%, Former: 27.2%, Current: 56.5% vs. 11.8%, 20.9%, 67.3% (statistics NR). Ireri (2024) [58] Cross-Sectional Study Kenya 314 182:132 58.49 ± 17.43 DM ± Ne History of alcohol consumption Alcohol consumption not considerably related to Ne (p = 0.481). Jeyam (2020) [59] Cross-Sectional Study Scotland Overall: 5558; With DPN 715; Without DPN 4842 Overall: 2449:3109; With DPN: 320:395; Without DPN 2129:2713 ^ Overall: 44.7 (33, 55.2); With DPN: 50.6 (41, 59.3); Without DPN: 43.7 (32, 54.4) T1DM ± DPN Alcohol (u/wk): 2–6, 6–14, 14–21, 21–32, >32 Alcohol consumption beneath 32 u/wk related to decrease odds of DPN (0.47 [0.29–0.75], p < 0.05), whereas above 32 u/wk was not (0.88 [0.56–1.38], p > 0.05). Authors counsel reverse causation–protopathic bias. Li (2023) [60] Cross-Sectional Study China Overall: 25,710; With PDPN: 14,699; Without PDPN: 11,011 Overall: 10,785:14,925; With PDPN: 6240:8459; Without PDPN: 4545:6466 ^ Overall: 63 (55, 71); With PDPN: 65 (56, 73); Without PDPN: 61 (53, 69) T2DM ± PDPN Alcohol Abuse: Yes, No PDPN considerably decrease with alcohol abuse vs. with out (54.1% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.002). Authors counsel reverse causation–protopathic bias. Mawdsley & Mayer (1965) [61] Cross-Sectional Study US Chronic Alcoholism: 76; Healthy Personnel: 105 Chronic Alcoholism: 12:64; Healthy Personnel: NR Chronic Alcoholism: 25–69; Healthy Personnel: 20–70 Chronic alcohol use ± PN History of alcohol consumption (1 pint whisky to 1 gallon wine/d) Electrophysiology considerably diminished vs. management (p < 0.001 for all). McCulloch (1980) [62] Cross-Sectional Scotland 541 0:541 44 ± 11.6 (20–59) DM ± PN Alcohol Intake: Moderate (6 drinks/yr to 10 drinks/wk) vs. Excessive (3–4 drinks/d to recognized alcoholism) PN considerably increased in DM males with extreme alcohol consumption vs. these with reasonable (36% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and most evident with shorter durations of DM (<5 yrs: 32% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Melgaard (1986) [63] Cross-Sectional Study Denmark 468 0:468 45 “Normal” inhabitants ± PoN Alcohol questionnaire together with length and frequency of use Dependence-related behaviors have been considerably correlated with disturbed electrophysiology (p < 0.05). Mellion (2014) [64] Cross-Sectional Study US Overall: 18; Heavy Drinkers: 9; Healthy Co: 9 9:9 Heavy Drinkers: 35.4; Healthy Co: 43.3 Heavy alcohol ingesting (>5 drinks/d (M), >4 drinks/d (F)) + PN vs. wholesome co Eth consumed day by day (g); Average length heavy ingesting Individuals with a historical past of heavy alcohol consumption exhibited diminished electrophysiology, in comparison with these with out (p < 0.05). Mick (2020) [65] Cross-Sectional Study France, Italy, Spain, UK 1030 651:379 60.2 ± 15.32; ^ 61 (49–72) Localized NP on account of any etiology Alcohol Abuse/Dependence: Current, Past, Never Current or previous alcohol dependence/abuse was reported in 6.36% of sufferers with NP (additional statistics NR). Mills (1986) [66] Cross-Sectional Study UK 19 4:15 (30–71) Chronic alcoholism ± PN History of alcoholism (120 g eth/d for 4+ yrs) Chronic alcohol consumption (>100 g/d) considerably related to electrophysiological PN in 12/19 (statistics NR). Monforte (1995) [67] Cross-Sectional Study Spain Alcohol-Dependent: 107; Healthy Reference: 61 Alcohol-Dependent: 18:89; Healthy Reference: 10:51 Alcohol-Dependent: 43 ± 11; Healthy Reference: 41 ± 14 Chronic alcohol use ± PN History of alcohol consumption (>100 g/d (M) or >80 g/d (F) for >2 yrs) Electrophysiological PN recognized in 36.8% of alcohol-dependent people vs. 1 management (1.64%), p < 0.001). Diminished electrophysiology correlated with better TLDE (r = −0.43, p < 0.001). Nagakura (2023) [68] Ecological Cross-Sectional Study Japan Pregabalin Reimbursement Claims per 1000 inhabitants; as much as 126 million NR (40–74) NP on account of any etiology handled with pregabalin Alcohol: Daily, Sometimes, Rarely/Never Excessive alcohol consumption considerably related to prevalent NP (β = 0.2683, p < 0.01); low-to-moderate consumption diminished prevalence (r = −0.4713, p < 0.01); day by day consumption elevated prevalence (r = 0.6253, p < 0.01). Nicolosi (2005) [69] Cross-Sectional Study Italy 40 4:36 49.2 ± 10.3 (33–76) Chronic alcohol use ± SoN History of alcohol consumption (100–400 g/d for five–25 yrs) SoN in 62.5% (25). Electromyography scores have been statistically considerably positively correlated with TLDE (r = 0.35, p < 0.03). Nielsen (2022) [70] Cross-Sectional Study Denmark 2839 High CIPN Score: 274:146; Low CIPN Score: 1193:870 ^^ High CIPN Score: 69; Low CIPN Score: 67; (18–99) Cancer prognosis at any stage of remedy ± CIPN Alcohol: sure/no + u/wk Alcohol consumption considerably completely different between CIPN teams (60.2% vs. 73.5%, p < 0.001); excessive consumption (>14 u/wk) considerably related to excessive CIPN20 scores in males (22% vs. 11%, p = 0.002). Papantoniou (2024) [71] Cross-Sectional Study Greece 90 34:56 51.98 ± 8.86 (27–74) AUD ± PN Duration of Abuse; Total Alcohol Units (kg alcohol/lifetime) Alcohol abuse considerably longer in these with Ne vs. with out (8.08 ± 7.25 vs. 6.92 ± 4.38, p = 0.024), and in these with impaired electrophysiology (p = 0.02). Revesz (2022) [72] Cross-Sectional Study The Netherlands Overall: 1516; With PN: 980; Without PN: 536 Overall: 634:882; With PN: 445:535; Without PN: 189:347 Overall: 69.1 ± 9.4; With PN: 70.1 ± 9.4; Without PN: 67.2 ± 9.2 Colorectal most cancers survivors ± PN Alcohol Consumption: Drinks/wk Alcohol consumption considerably decrease in people with PN vs. with out (median 4 vs. 5 drinks/wk, vary 0–100 vs. 0–50, p = 0.006) in univariate evaluation solely. Sahito (2022) [73] Cross-Sectional Study Pakistan Overall: 1057; With PN: 607; Without PN: 450 Overall: 414:643; With PN: 230:377; Without PN: 184:266 30–40: 119; 41–50: 316; 51–60: 324; 61–70: 165; >70 yrs: 133 T2DM ± PN History of alcohol consumption: Yes, No Alcohol consumption reported between PN teams: 4.7% vs. 1.4% (statistics NR). Shetty (2025) [74] Cross-Sectional Study India 110 9:101 41.5 ± 11.9 (22–84) Chronic liver illness ± PN History of alcohol consumption (≥5 yrs) Duration (13.9 ± 6.1 yrs vs. 9.6 ± 4.6 yrs, p < 0.05), and amount of alcohol consumption considerably increased in these with PN vs. with out. Srivastava (2022) [75] Cross-Sectional Study India 98 79:19 51.63 ± 10.68 Cancer survivors ± CIPN History of alcohol consumption: Yes (present, former), No History of alcohol consumption not considerably related to CIPN sensory/motor severity (18.37% vs. 81.63%, p > 0.05). Trendowski (2021) [76] Cross-Sectional Study US With CIPN: 550; Without CIPN: 495 With CIPN: 440:110; Without CIPN: 355:140 ^^ With CIPN: 56 (23–79); Without CIPN: 58 (21–79) African American most cancers survivors ± CIPN Alcohol: sure (earlier 4 wks)/no; Alcohol Consumed (drinks/wk): 0–4, ≥5 Alcohol consumption, drinks/d, not considerably related to CIPN (aPR: 0.88 [0.68–1.14], p = 0.32; aPR: 0.99 [0.91–1.07], p = 0.73). Van der Velde (2020) [77] Cross-Sectional Study The Netherlands Overall: 2401; High Sural SNAPA: 793; Med Sural SNAPA: 796; Low Sural SNAPA: 812 Overall: 1174:1227; High Sural SNAPA: 464:329; Med Sural SNAPA: 377:419; Low Sural SNAPA: 334:478 Overall: 59.3 ± 8.2; High Sural SNAPA: 56.4 ± 8.2; Med Sural SNAPA: 59.4 ± 7.9; Low Sural SNAPA: 62 ± 7.5 T2DM ± PN Alcohol: >7 (F)/14 (M) models Alcohol consumption reported between PN teams: High: 26.7%, Medium: 25.8%, Low: 27.6% (statistics NR). Villalta (1989) [78] Cross-Sectional Study Spain Chronic Alcoholism: 70; Hospital Personnel: 70 Chronic Alcoholism: 0:70; Hospital Personnel: NR Chronic Alcoholism: 39.7 ± 9.6 (20–60); Hospital Personnel: 39.2 ± 11 (20–59) Chronic alcoholism + PN vs. hospital personnel History of alcohol consumption (>100 g/d for >2 yrs) Prevalence of PN in 37% (21/56). Motor CV considerably negatively correlated with TLDE (r = −0.28, p < 0.05). Vittadini (2001) [79] Cross-Sectional Study Italy 296 87:209 45.2 ± 11.2 (20–77) Chronic alcohol use ± PoN History of alcohol consumption (>100 g/d) Prevalence of electrophysiological PoN in 48.6% (144/296). PoN severity elevated as length of alcohol misuse lengthened (19.8% at 5 yrs to 40.4% at 10 yrs, p < 0.05). Wang (2023) [80] Cross-Sectional Study China Overall: 14,908; With DPN: 10,084; Without DPN: 4824 Overall: 6322:8586; With DPN: 4365:5719; Without DPN: 1957:2867 Overall: 61.3 ± 13, ^ 62 (53, 70); With DPN: 62.6 ± 12.5, ^ 63 (55, 71); Without DPN: 58.5 ± 13.5, ^ 59 (50, 67) T2DM ± DPN Alcohol Abuse (Pure Consumption in g/d): >40 (F)/60 (M); Never, Former, Current Alcohol abuse considerably decrease amongst these with DPN vs. with out (8.2% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Wetterling (1999) [81] Cross-Sectional Study Germany 241 64:177 F: 43.8 ± 8.8; M: 41 ± 9.9 Chronic alcohol use ± PoN History of alcohol consumption: episodic (<1 d/wk), frequent (>3 d/wk), steady (day by day) Prevalence of PoN elevated with growing alcohol consumption (11.3%, 29.6%, 29.9%, p = 0.025), and TLDE (p = 0.0104). Wilson & Thompson (2021) [82] Cross-Sectional Study UK Detoxification+: 17; Detoxification−: 13 Detoxification+: 6:11; Detoxification−: 6:7 Detoxification+: 46.8 ± 9 (37–64); Detoxification−: 54.5 ± 10.5 (30–70) High-risk alcohol use ± historical past of cleansing ± NP High-risk alcohol use by way of FAST rating ≥ 3 Prevalence of NP (IDPQ ≥ 3) considerably better in these with historical past of cleansing (8/9) vs. these with out (1/12), p = 0.04. Wu (2025) [83] Cross-Sectional Study US Overall: 1068; MNSI+: 666; MNSI−: 402 641:427 84.1 (78–100) Very outdated adults ± PN Alcohol: Never, Former, Current Current, former alcohol use not related to MNSI-defined neuropathy (0.90 [0.59–1.37], 1.02 [0.67–1.54], respectively). Former use not related to monofilament insensitivity (0.78 [0.52–1.16]), whereas present use was (0.65 [0.43–0.98]). Yokoyama (2020) [84] Cross-Sectional Study Japan Overall: 9914; Without DPoN: 6180; With DPoN: 2745 (with DPoNS: 1689; with UDoPN: 989) Overall: 3715:6139; Without DPoN: 2273:3904; With DPoN: 1041:1705 (with DPoNS: 664:1025, with UDPoN: 397:530) ^^ Overall: 66 (69–73); Without DPoN: 65 (57–71); With DPoN: 70 (63–77) (with DPoNS: 69 (63–76), with UDPoN: 67 (59–75)) T2DM ± DPoN Alcohol: Current, Former, Never Former alcohol consumption related to increased odds of DPN (2.02 [1.25–3.27], p = 0.004), whereas present was not. Authors counsel reverse causation–protopathic bias. Zahr (2019) [85] Cross-Sectional Study US Ca: 154; Co: 99 Ca: 43:111; Co: 41:58 Ca: 49.8 ± 10.5 (21–77); Co: 50.9 ± 13.3 (21–74) Ca: AUD ± PN; Co: wholesome ± PN History of AUD Prevalence of PN (Ca: 20 vs. 134; Co: 3 vs. 96; p = 0.007), vibration notion impairment (Ca: 41 vs. 113; Co: 15 vs. 84; p = 0.03), better with historical past of AUD. Zambelis (2005) [86] Cross-Sectional Study Greece 98 22:17 45.2 ± 9.9 (27–70) Chronic alcohol dependence ± PoN Daily alcohol consumption (g); length of alcohol abuse Duration of alcohol consumption considerably increased in these with PoN vs. with out (19.19 vs. 14.14, p = 0.03). Zambelis (2016) [87] Cross-Sectional Study Greece 99 23:76 47 ± 19.6 Alcohol dependence ± Ulnar Ne Duration of alcohol dependence UNE considerably related to length of alcohol dependence (1.09 [1.04–1.15], p < 0.001).


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13297589/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us

fooshya

Recent Posts

Trails within the Sky: 2nd Chapter

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…

4 minutes ago

Fire Emblem: Fortune’s Weave Assessment: Let The Games Start

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you'll…

6 minutes ago

BUCHAREST – by Eduardo Ortiz

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you…

11 minutes ago

LinkedIn

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you…

19 minutes ago

The journey plan for Kansas soccer

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you'll…

43 minutes ago