This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-14/tasmania-gaming-commission-new-pokies-policies-harm/106910674and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us [ad_1] The Tasmanian authorities's new poker machine insurance policies will "take Tasmania backwards" on hurt discount and make issues worse for downside gamblers, the state's gaming regulator says.Treasurer Eric Abetz introduced a brand new suite of insurance policies in January after the federal government stalled the rollout of a brand new necessary pre-commitment card.The new insurance policies included ATMs in venues, a ticket-in ticket-out (TITO) system for poker machines, and facial recognition know-how in venues to establish individuals on the self-exclusion scheme.In letters obtained by the ABC beneath right-to-information legal guidelines, the Tasmanian Liquor and Gaming Commission outlined a variety of considerations to Mr Abetz.In a joint letter signed by the three commissioners, they confirmed Mr Abetz had not consulted with them previous to taking the brand new insurance policies to cupboard for approval."The commission had not been consulted in any way concerning these measures," a March 31 letter reads."We are concerned that many will not deliver protections from gambling harm, but in fact will have the opposite effect, and take Tasmania backwards from where it currently is."The fee has been directed to progressively implement the brand new insurance policies by mid-2028.Access to ATMs might create 'higher hurt', commissioners sayThe fee was significantly involved with the ATM and TITO insurance policies.Under the modifications, pubs and golf equipment will have the ability to set up ATMs with a $400 withdrawal restrict, fitted with facial recognition know-how; in the meanwhile, as much as $200 money could be withdrawn by way of EFTPOS."We see this initiative as potentially creating greater harm rather than minimising or preventing it," the commissioners' letter reads."Ready availability to additional cash beyond what is brought into a venue allows for an immediate response to chasing losses on [poker machines] and is why this is seen as such a harmful initiative."The fee says among the new measures might make issues worse for downside gamblers. (Unsplash: Erik Mclean)During the coverage announcement and within the letters, Mr Abetz mentioned the TITO coverage would require gamers to transform as much as $100 money into tickets to insert into the poker machines, with no restrict on tickets.This determine later elevated to $200 per ticket.Commissioners doubted whether or not this technique would cut back hurt."There is no evidence to indicate that ease and speed will, or is even likely to, result in protection from harm," they wrote to Mr Abetz."Notably, there is strong evidence to suggest that 'tap and go' and TITO systems can result in an increased 'spending effect' of up to 20 per cent."The fee needed buying and selling hours to be the identical in any respect venues to forestall downside gamblers shifting from one to a different. (ABC News)They agreed with considerations the TITO system might introduce the chance of cash laundering into Tasmanian venues.Another new measure is to scale back the working occasions of pokies venues from 20 to 17 hours a day.The fee argued buying and selling hours must be the identical for all venues, fairly than the potential for staggered opening hours, however this was not adopted."The commission has evidence of players, including those self excluded, moving from one venue to the next in the small hours of the day, a practice exacerbating harm to problem gamblers," they wrote.Treasurer defends new insurance policiesMr Abetz met with the fee two days after they despatched the letter, and wrote again on April 17 defending the brand new measures.He described them as being proportional, sensible and having "respect for personal agency"."It is critical to look at the package as a whole, with each measure reinforcing the others, rather than as isolated initiatives," Mr Abetz wrote.Eric Abetz says the brand new measures must be checked out as a complete fairly than in isolation. (ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke)He disagreed with the fee over its feedback on the TITO system, which he mentioned "does not increase a player's total available funds"."Rather, it removes the ability to continuously load machines using large quantities of coins and enables modern system controls," Mr Abetz wrote.He argued the introduction of ATMs into venues would help with the facial recognition know-how and allow limits to be enforced.Pokies losses risingAfter saying the brand new insurance policies, Mr Abetz confronted intensive questioning in parliament over who he had consulted with.The hospitality sector had persistently argued towards the necessary pre-commitment card, however appeared supportive of the brand new suite of insurance policies.In March, Mr Abetz instructed parliament that it was "an iterative process"."If you talk to our hoteliers, the insurance policies they have to take, for example, for keeping huge amounts of cash on their premises can be removed," he mentioned."That will be a financial burden removed from them."The hospitality sector seems supportive of the federal government's new measures. (ABC News: Laura Beavis)Labor was supportive of the brand new insurance policies in precept, having opposed the pre-commitment card.Pokies losses have persistently elevated because the finish of COVID.In May alone, gamers misplaced greater than $17.7 million.Venues got possession of their very own poker machine licences from July 2023 when the federal government ended Federal Group's monopoly mannequin.Data from the Treasury Department confirmed the venue's income have elevated because the mannequin modified, with a big improve within the six months to December final yr.Meg Webb says the federal government ought to have consulted the fee. (ABC News: Kate Nickels)Nelson impartial MP Meg Webb, who has campaigned closely for pokies hurt discount together with necessary pre-commitment, mentioned it was regarding that the fee was not consulted."The Rockliff government has intentionally chosen not to seek advice from the independent, expert gaming commission in developing new measures to reduce pokies harm," she mentioned."And compounds this by deliberately refusing to heed the commission's strong warnings that the government's new measures will in fact cause more harm." [ad_2] This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-14/tasmania-gaming-commission-new-pokies-policies-harm/106910674and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us