This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42055730/and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us [ad_1] . 2026 Jan-Dec:33:10732748261448642. doi: 10.1177/10732748261448642. Epub 2026 Apr 29. Arrianna Marie Planey 1 2 , Michelle L Manning 2 , Mindy Gellin 2 , Camille R Murray 1 , Hillary Ok Hecht 1 , Austin R Waters 1 3 , Lisa P Spees 2 4 , Bridgette Thom 2 5 , Kevin Pignone 1 , Donald L Rosenstein 2 6 , Stephanie B Wheeler 1 2 Affiliations Expand Affiliations 1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LCCC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 4 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (DPOP), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5 School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 6 Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Item in Clipboard Arrianna Marie Planey et al. Cancer Control. 2026 Jan-Dec. Show particulars Display choices Display choices Format Abstract PubMed PMID . 2026 Jan-Dec:33:10732748261448642. doi: 10.1177/10732748261448642. Epub 2026 Apr 29. Authors Arrianna Marie Planey 1 2 , Michelle L Manning 2 , Mindy Gellin 2 , Camille R Murray 1 , Hillary Ok Hecht 1 , Austin R Waters 1 3 , Lisa P Spees 2 4 , Bridgette Thom 2 5 , Kevin Pignone 1 , Donald L Rosenstein 2 6 , Stephanie B Wheeler 1 2 Affiliations 1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LCCC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 4 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (DPOP), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5 School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 6 Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Item in Clipboard CiteDisplay choices Display choices Format AbstractPubMedPMID Abstract IntroductionFinancial toxicity (FT) is extra prevalent amongst rural-dwelling most cancers survivors who additionally face larger most cancers care-related journey burdens. We sought to look at how FT and journey burdens might pose twin burdens for most cancers survivors, and assess their results on care experiences and subsequent cost-coping methods.MethodsRapid qualitative evaluation of semi-structured interviews with rural-dwelling most cancers survivors who screened optimistic for FT per the COmprehensive Score for monetary Toxicity (COST) measure. Our evaluation was structured round three inductive themes: rural-dwelling sufferers' experiences of most cancers therapy whereas navigating FT, affected person perceptions of journey burdens undertaken in the middle of accessing most cancers care, and perceived implications of each FT and journey burdens for care on HRQoL.OutcomesThe (n = 12) contributors in our examine had been largely girls, with a median age of 60.1. The median COST rating was 9.5, indicating a excessive diploma of FT, and the median round-trip journey distance was 25.6 miles. Participants reported cost-coping methods to scale back travel-associated prices, equivalent to "stacking" appointments to scale back journey prices and benefiting from non-medical help supplied by well being methods' monetary help packages (e.g., gasoline playing cards). Participants additionally reported shared burdens with caregivers who additionally shouldered prices.ConclusionsEstimates of journey distances to most cancers care probably understate journey burdens, as a result of they don't seize the frequency of appointments and their related oblique and alternative prices for most cancers survivors experiencing FT. Financial help for most cancers survivors must be attentive to the twin and cumulative monetary and journey burdens of most cancers care. Keywords: entry to care; most cancers care; monetary toxicity; journey burdens. Plain language abstract Rural-dwelling most cancers survivors usually tend to expertise Financial Toxicity (FT) in tandem with larger most cancers care-related journey burdens. This qualitative examine sought to look at how FT and journey burdens might pose twin burdens for most cancers survivors, and assess their results on care experiences and subsequent cost-coping methods. We performed semi-structured interviews with (n = 12) contributors sampled from the Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) examine, an intervention that screened for FT and supplied site-based monetary navigation providers and helps. Interview contributors had been largely girls, with a median age of 60.1. The median COmprehensive Score for monetary Toxicity (COST) rating was 9.5, indicating a excessive diploma of FT, and the median round-trip journey distance was 25.6 miles. Participants reported cost-coping methods to scale back travel-associated prices, equivalent to “stacking” appointments to scale back journey prices and benefiting from non-medical help supplied well being methods’ monetary help packages (e.g., gasoline playing cards). Participants additionally reported shared burdens with caregivers who additionally shouldered prices. Concomitant caregivers- or most cancers survivors who had been additionally caregivers- had been particularly in have to helps to mitigate the twin burdens of most cancers care-related FT and journey burdens. PubMed Disclaimer Conflict of curiosity assertion Declaration of Conflicting PursuitsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of curiosity with respect to the analysis, authorship, and/or publication of this text. MeSH phrases Adaptation, Psychological Cancer Survivors* / psychology Cancer Survivors* / statistics & numerical knowledge Health Services Accessibility / economics Rural Population* / statistics & numerical knowledge [ad_2] This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42055730/and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us