A take a look at the individuals who name them dwelling

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the next
Statistics Canada colleagues for his or her insightful feedback on early drafts of
this text: Thomas
Anderson, Paula Arriagada, Nicolas Bastien, Amanda Bleakney, Sylvie Godin,
Bertrand Ouellet-Léveillé, Laurent Martel, France-Pascale Ménard, Anne Milan,
Jerry Situ and Jennifer Yuen.

Highlights

• 
  In
  2021, 2.4 million individuals in Canada lived in a multigenerational family,
  representing 6.5% of all individuals dwelling in a personal family. The prevalence
  of this dwelling association various significantly throughout the nation. While 1 in 4
  individuals (24.9%) in Nunavut lived in a multigenerational family, this
  was the case for 3.1% of individuals dwelling in Quebec.






• 
  Consistent
  with patterns noticed in different international locations, people representing the oldest
  technology inside a multigenerational family had been predominantly girls.




• 
  In
  2021, about 1 in 8 (12.2%) one-parent households lived in a multigenerational
  family. Most (79.3%) of the dad and mom heading these households had been the center
  technology within the family, residing with each their kids and their
  dad and mom.






• 
  Over
  half (52.7%) of individuals dwelling in multigenerational households in 2021 had been racialized,
  and two-fifths (40.5%) had been born exterior Canada—each proportions significantly
  greater than these of the inhabitants dwelling in different households (24.7% and
  25.5%, respectively).






• 
  Multigenerational
  dwelling was most prevalent amongst individuals reporting ethnic or cultural origins
  rooted in South Asia: In 2021, greater than one-third of individuals with Sikh (36.6%)
  or Punjabi (34.2%) ethnic or cultural origins lived in a multigenerational
  family. Proportions had been additionally comparatively excessive amongst these with Tamil
  (21.7%), Pakistani (19.3%), Indian (19.0%) or Sri Lankan (18.7%) ethnic or
  cultural origins.






• 
  Among
  people comprising the oldest technology in a multigenerational family,
  almost one-quarter (23.8%) didn’t know English or French properly sufficient to
  conduct a dialog.






• 
  Compared
  to different households, a decrease proportion of multigenerational households had
  unaffordable housing (20.8% versus 11.1%), however a comparatively greater proportion had been
  characterised as crowded (4.7% versus 28.3%).






• 
  Compared
  to different households, a decrease proportion of multigenerational households had been in
  low earnings (15.5% versus 4.3%), and equally, a smaller proportion had been in
  core housing want (10.3% versus 4.6%).

Introduction

Over latest many years, Canada has skilled fast progress
in households made up of assorted mixtures of rapid household, prolonged relations
and non-relatives.^Note 
Among these, multigenerational households—the place three or extra generations of
the identical household stay collectively—are among the many most outstanding.

In 2021, there have been
almost half one million multigenerational households in Canada (441,750), representing a 21.2% improve
in quantity from 2011 (364,505).^Note  This progress
charge exceeded that of all households mixed, which rose by 12.4%. The improve in
multigenerational households could
replicate a deliberate technique amongst households dealing with challenges associated to
housing affordability and the price of dwelling, in addition to shifting life-style and
cultural preferences.^Note 
As the ethnocultural composition of the inhabitants continues to evolve^Note 
alongside inhabitants getting old^Note  ,
multigenerational dwelling preparations could play an more and more essential position
within the care and help networks of youngsters, dad and mom and older adults within the
coming years.

The the rest of this research unpacks Canada’s
multigenerational households, describing the sociodemographic and socioeconomic
traits of the individuals who name them dwelling.

Multigenerational dwelling is most prevalent in Nunavut, British
Columbia and Ontario, whereas uncommon in Quebec

There had been 2.4 million individuals dwelling in multigenerational
households in Canada in 2021, representing 6.5% of all individuals dwelling in
non-public households.^Note 
Regionally, the prevalence of multigenerational dwelling varies considerably
(Table 1). Half (50.2%) of all individuals dwelling in multigenerational households in
2021 resided within the province of Ontario—an overrepresentation on condition that the
province accounted for 38.6% of Canada’s
complete inhabitants that yr. Similarly, the inhabitants dwelling in multigenerational
households was overrepresented in British Columbia (17.7%) in comparison with its
share of Canada’s complete inhabitants (13.5%). Together, Ontario and British
Columbia had been dwelling to two-thirds (67.9%) of all individuals dwelling in multigenerational
households in 2021.

Owing to its small
inhabitants, Nunavut accounted for a really small share of Canada’s complete
inhabitants dwelling in multigenerational households. However, this dwelling
association was by far probably the most prevalent in that territory. In 2021, one in
4 Nunavut residents (24.9%) lived in a multigenerational family, extra
than triple the nationwide common (6.5%). Previous research have discovered that the
prevalence of crowded housing was elevated amongst Inuit dwelling in Inuit Nunangat
(together with Nunavut), owing to housing provide challenges and shortages.^{Note  Note} 

In distinction,
multigenerational dwelling was comparatively uncommon in Quebec: In 2021, 3.1% of individuals
within the province lived in a multigenerational family, the bottom proportion
among the many provinces and territories. Quebec has lengthy held the best share of
individuals dwelling alone among the many provinces and territories.^Note  It
additionally has a low prevalence of younger adults dwelling with their dad and mom^Note  and
grandchildren dwelling with their grandparents.^Note 
These patterns are thought to replicate a mixture of comparatively low shelter
prices in Quebec’s city areas, in addition to varied sociocultural and structural elements—together with
the truth that a higher-than-average share of older adults within the province reside
in long-term care properties or residences for older adults.^Note 

Overall, the prevalence of
multigenerational dwelling was barely decrease in rural^Note  areas of
the nation (4.9%) than in city^Note 
areas (6.8%).
Within these city areas, the census metropolitan space (CMA)^Note  of Abbotsford-Mission had the best share
of individuals dwelling in a multigenerational
family in 2021
(17.5%), adopted by the CMA of Toronto (11.6%) (Map 1).
In line with provincial patterns, varied communities in Quebec had the
lowest shares: One p.c or fewer of all individuals residing within the census agglomerations of
Rimouski, Thetford Mines, Saint-Georges and Rivière-du-Loup had been dwelling in a multigenerational
family in 2021.

Data desk for Map 1

Data desk for map 1

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Region (showing as row headers), , calculated utilizing (showing as column headers).

Region	p.c
Notes: This map exhibits the census metropolitan areas (CMAs) and census agglomerations (CAs) with the best and lowest proportions of people dwelling in multigenerational households in 2021. A census metropolitan space (CMA) or a census agglomeration (CA) is shaped by a number of adjoining municipalities centred on a inhabitants centre (referred to as the core). A CMA will need to have a complete inhabitants of a minimum of 100,000, based mostly on information from the present Census of Population Program, of which 50,000 or extra should stay within the core based mostly on adjusted information from the earlier Census of Population Program. A CA will need to have a core inhabitants of a minimum of 10,000 additionally based mostly on information from the earlier Census of Population Program. To be included within the CMA or CA, different adjoining municipalities will need to have a excessive diploma of integration with the core, as measured by commuting flows derived from information on place of business from the earlier Census Program. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
Abbotsford-Mission	17.5
Toronto	11.6
Vancouver	10.6
Oshawa	9.7
Essa	9.7
Alma	1.1
Rimouski	1.0
Thetford Mines	1.0
Saint-Georges	0.8
Rivière-du-Loup	0.8

All within the household: Benefits and burdens of
multigenerational dwelling

Sharing
your dwelling area with prolonged members of the family can provide distinctive benefits as
properly as challenges as compared with different dwelling preparations. When requested
concerning the elements that led them to stay in a multigenerational family, most
individuals place monetary concerns on the high of their record. Particularly
for youthful adults who could also be dealing with difficult circumstances similar to
unemployment, underemployment, housing provide shortages, or relationship
dissolution,
sharing a house with older relations can present a protecting impact towards
poverty
and ease monetary pressures through useful resource pooling. This dwelling association is
additionally usually framed as being sensible for its members; it might probably provide advantages
similar to the supply of casual care of younger kids or adults in want,
doubtlessly enhancing work-life steadiness and allowing older adults to proceed
dwelling at dwelling.^Note 

Additional
social and emotional advantages of multigenerational dwelling are additionally generally
famous, such because the companionship and help that this association can provide.
Living with others can enhance psychological well being for some people by lowering
emotions of loneliness and isolation. The common interplay between youthful
and older generations may also help the event of the previous and supply a
sense of function and satisfaction to the latter, enhancing well-being whereas
boosting intergenerational solidarity.^Note 

On the opposite hand,
some facets of multigenerational dwelling could result in elevated tensions when
non-public areas are unavailable or inadequate to family members, or when
the design of the dwelling is unsuitable.^Note 
Crowded dwelling situations may also have direct unfavourable impacts on the well being
of older, frail family members.^Note 
Sharing area with one’s youthful or older members of the family can pressure
intergenerational relationships attributable to evolving norms and beliefs among the many
respective generations, differing parenting kinds or disagreements over
family chores.^Note 
It may also influence the broader social networks of people, if, as an example,
they keep away from bringing dwelling mates or romantic companions attributable to an absence of privateness
or area.^Note 

There can also be
proof that sharing a house with youthful grownup relations might be detrimental to
the monetary well-being of the older generations, who could also be, as an example,
financing their very own retirement in addition to the bills of their grownup kids
and grandchildren out of a way of filial obligation or cultural expectations,
typically lowering their very own financial savings and wealth.^Note 
Older generations have typically been discovered to be ‘net givers’ of monetary and
time assets inside multigenerational households.^Note 

People
dwelling in multigenerational
households come
from a wide range of paths in life; there’s appreciable variety within the household
traits, socioeconomic and cultural circumstances of every technology in
the household which intersect with these of the opposite members of the family. Research to
date signifies that a person’s satisfaction with multigenerational dwelling
shall be largely pushed by the diploma to which they’d a selection within the
association, somewhat than perceiving that there was no viable different.^Note 

Living in a multigenerational
family is commonest in early childhood and older maturity (Chart 1). In
2021, one in ten (10.2%) younger kids aged 0 to 4 lived in a multigenerational
family, whereas this was true of seven.5% of individuals aged 85 and over. This dwelling
association was least prevalent amongst adults of their late 50s (4.9%); as seen
within the companion piece to this research, Adulting
collectively: Parents and grownup kids who co-reside, many individuals in
this age group stay with their grownup kids with none extra
generations of the household current.

Data desk for Chart 1

Data desk for chart 1

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Age group (showing as row headers), , calculated utilizing (showing as column headers).

Age group	p.c
Note: The horizontal line refers back to the proportion for all ages mixed. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
All ages	6.5
0 to 4	10.2
5 to 9	9.0
10 to 14	8.3
15 to 19	7.6
20 to 24	6.3
25 to 29	5.4
30 to 34	5.6
35 to 39	6.2
40 to 44	6.3
45 to 49	6.2
50 to 54	5.6
55 to 59	4.9
60 to 64	5.0
65 to 69	5.8
70 to 74	6.4
75 to 79	6.7
80 to 84	7.2
85 and over	7.5

While members of the
youngest technology in multigenerational households had been principally kids underneath
the age of 15 (65.4%), the age distributions of these within the center and oldest
generations had been extra various (Chart 2). Most individuals representing the center
technology had been Millennials (between the ages of 25 and 40 that yr) or Gen
X-ers (aged 41 to 55). In distinction, the majority of the oldest technology had been Baby
Boomers who had been aged 56 to 75 in 2021. The Millennials and the Baby Boomers
had been Canada’s fastest-growing and largest beginning cohorts, respectively, in 2021.^Note 

Data desk for Chart 2

Data desk for chart 2

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Age group (showing as row headers), Youngest technology, Middle technology, Oldest technology and All individuals in multigenerational households, calculated utilizing p.c items of measure (showing as column headers).

Age group	Youngest technology	Middle technology	Oldest technology	All individuals in multigenerational households
	p.c
Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
0 to 4	22.8	0.3	0.0	7.9
5 to 9	22.2	0.5	0.0	7.8
10 to 14	20.4	1.1	0.0	7.4
15 to 19	16.0	2.4	0.0	6.4
20 to 24	10.9	5.0	0.0	5.9
25 to 29	5.2	9.0	0.0	5.5
30 to 34	1.6	13.7	0.1	6.0
35 to 39	0.5	16.4	0.3	6.5
40 to 44	0.2	15.9	1.2	6.4
45 to 49	0.1	14.0	2.9	6.0
50 to 54	0.0	10.6	5.6	5.5
55 to 59	0.0	6.6	10.6	5.4
60 to 64	0.0	3.0	15.5	5.4
65 to 69	0.0	1.0	18.1	5.3
70 to 74	0.0	0.3	17.5	4.9
75 to 79	0.0	0.1	12.5	3.4
80 to 84	0.0	0.0	8.5	2.3
85 and over	0.0	0.0	7.2	2.0

Women are overrepresented among the many oldest technology in multigenerational
households

Most
individuals representing the center or oldest technology in multigenerational
households had been girls (53.7% and 62.5%, respectively), whereas the other was
true among the many youngest technology, amongst which 52.4% of individuals had been boys or
males (Chart 3). The better prevalence of boys or males within the youngest technology
is essentially a operate of the composition within the normal inhabitants at these
ages: general, 51.3% of individuals aged 14 and underneath in 2021 had been boys.

Data desk for Chart 3

Data desk for chart 3

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Household kind and technology of individual (showing as row headers), , calculated utilizing (showing as column headers).

Household kind and technology of individual	p.c
Notes: The horizontal line refers back to the degree at which there could be an equal variety of girls+ and males+. Given that the non-binary inhabitants is small, information aggregation to a two-category gender variable is usually obligatory to guard the confidentiality of responses supplied. In these circumstances, people within the class “non-binary persons” are distributed into the opposite two gender classes and are denoted by the “+” image. The class “Women+” contains girls or women, in addition to some non-binary individuals. The class “Men+” contains males or boys, in addition to some non-binary individuals. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
Gender parity	50.0
Youngest technology in a multigenerational family	47.6
Middle technology in a multigenerational family	53.7
Oldest technology in a multigenerational family	62.5
In different households	50.4

The
predominance of girls among the many older generations of multigenerational
households displays a number of elements. Firstly, the better longevity of girls on
common interprets to comparatively extra uncoupled older girls within the inhabitants
who could search out multigenerational dwelling for the potential companionship,
mutual care and help that this dwelling state of affairs might provide.^Note  As
proof of this, near one-third (31.0%) of oldest-generation girls had been
widowed, in contrast with 10.1% of oldest-generation males.

Additionally,
the extra weak monetary state of affairs of older girls relative to older males—particularly
after divorce or widowhood^Note  ,
could push them to mix assets with their grownup kids to higher handle
the price of dwelling. Among members of the older technology, the proportion of
girls who had been separated or divorced (16.2%) was greater than the proportion
amongst males (9.6%).

Cultural
norms round caring and social interplay may contribute to the better
presence of matriarchs in multigenerational households, i.e., the better chance
of moms versus fathers to stay with their grownup kids. Previous
research have discovered that grandmothers are extra possible than grandfathers to
report caring for grandchildren (whether or not they co-reside or not)^{Note  Note}  , and
grownup kids usually tend to spend time often with their mom than
with their father.^Note 

Diverse relationship configurations among the many center and oldest generations
in multigenerational households

While typically, all
the members of a multigenerational family are associated to 1 one other in some
type^Note  ,
the precise household state of affairs of every technology within the family varies
significantly (Chart 4). In 2021, the overwhelming majority (99.6%) of individuals
representing the youngest technology had been kids dwelling with a minimum of one in all
their dad and mom in a census household.^Note 
In distinction, most middle-generation individuals lived with a partner or associate (66.9%), although 19.1% had been heading one-parent
households. An extra 12.3% of middle-generation individuals had been kids in
census households—which means that they had been dwelling with dad and mom in addition to a minimum of
one youthful relative similar to their niece or nephew, and and not using a partner,
associate or kids of their very own within the family.

Data desk for Chart 4

Data desk for chart 4

Table abstract
This desk shows the outcomes of Data desk for chart 4 Oldest technology, Middle technology and Youngest technology, calculated utilizing p.c items of measure (showing as column headers).

	Oldest technology	Middle technology	Youngest technology
	p.c
Note: In multigenerational households, census household standing is prioritized for the youngest two generations of the household. For instance, a person who resides with their grownup little one and their grandchild (the kid of their grownup little one) could be thought-about “living with other relatives” whereas the grownup little one and grandchild could be thought-about members of a one-parent census household. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
Child in census household	0.0	12.3	99.6
Spouse or associate in census household (with or with out kids)	58.3	66.9	0.4
Parent in one-parent census household	6.7	19.1	0.0
Not in a census household – dwelling with different relations	35.0	1.8	0.0

Like the center
technology, most members of the oldest technology in multigenerational
households had been dwelling with their partner or associate in 2021 (58.3%). However, extra
than one-third (35.0%) had been categorized as “living with relatives”; in most
circumstances, these individuals had been dwelling with their grownup little one and a minimum of one in all
their grandchildren.

Multigenerational dwelling is widespread amongst younger dad and mom
heading one-parent households

The members of one-parent
households are significantly economically weak on condition that the dad and mom
heading them are much less more likely to be employed^Note 
and extra more likely to be in low earnings^Note 
than different dad and mom, on common. For a few of these dad and mom, sharing a
dwelling with their very own dad and mom could provide advantages similar to help within the caring
of youngsters^Note 
and the sharing of housing bills^Note  ,
lowering the chance of their kids dwelling in poverty.^Note  In
2021, about 1 in 8 (12.2%) one-parent households had been dwelling in a multigenerational
family. Among these, most (79.3%) of the dad and mom represented the center technology
within the family, which means they lived with their little one and a number of of their
dad and mom.

Multigenerational
dwelling is especially prevalent amongst younger dad and mom who aren’t dwelling with a
partner or associate. Among teenage dad and mom (aged 15 to 19) heading a one-parent
household in 2021, greater than four-fifths (85.7%) had been the center technology in a
multigenerational family, whereas this was additionally true for slightly below half of 20-
to 24-year-old dad and mom heading a one-parent household (47.3%).

Regardless of the
kind of family wherein they lived, most dad and mom heading one-parent households
in 2021 had been girls (77.2%). However, girls accounted for a barely decrease
share of those dad and mom in multigenerational households (74.9%) than in
different households (77.6%), significantly amongst these aged lower than 50. This
distinction was pushed by the better propensity of younger males heading one-parent
households to stay with their dad and mom (Chart 5).
For occasion, amongst 20- to 24-year-old dad and mom not dwelling with a partner or
associate, greater than three-quarters (76.3%) of males lived in a multigenerational
family whereas this was the case for 40.9% of girls. In sum, amongst one-parent
households, multigenerational dwelling is extra widespread when the guardian is comparatively
younger, and significantly if the guardian is a younger man.

Data desk for Chart 5

Data desk for chart 5

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Age group (showing as row headers), Men+ and Women+, calculated utilizing p.c items of measure (showing as column headers).

Age group	Men+	Women+
	p.c
Note: Given that the non-binary inhabitants is small, information aggregation to a two-category gender variable is usually obligatory to guard the confidentiality of responses supplied. In these circumstances, people within the class “non-binary persons” are distributed into the opposite two gender classes and are denoted by the “+” image. The class “Women+” contains girls, in addition to some non-binary individuals. The class “Men+” contains males, in addition to some non-binary individuals. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
15 to 19	95.9	80.0
20 to 24	76.3	40.9
25 to 29	48.3	25.9
30 to 34	30.4	18.2
35 to 39	19.3	13.5
40 to 44	13.9	11.0
45 to 49	11.0	9.9
50 to 54	8.9	9.1
55 to 59	7.0	8.8
60 to 64	6.3	8.8
65 to 69	6.3	9.0
70 to 74	6.7	8.0
75 to 79	6.6	7.4
80 to 84	6.6	6.7
85 and over	6.3	5.7

Two in 5 individuals dwelling in multigenerational households
had been born exterior of Canada

In 2021, two in 5 (40.5%) individuals dwelling in multigenerational
households had been born exterior Canada—significantly greater than the speed amongst
individuals residing in different households (25.5%). Within multigenerational
households, the prevalence of foreign-born individuals was highest among the many oldest
technology (61.8%) and lowest among the many youngest technology (10.0%). That
stated, among the many
members of the youngest technology, near half (48.6%) had been born in Canada
to a minimum of one guardian who was born exterior Canada.

The better tendency of
foreign-born individuals to stay in a multigenerational family has been present in
many different western international locations and largely displays cultural preferences and
norms of their areas of origin.^Note 
Additionally, having extra relations within the family can facilitate extra
efficient transmission of the tradition of origin to youthful members of the family.^Note 
Sharing a house with relations will also be a sensible financial technique for
newcomers within the face of labour market obstacles or housing accessibility
challenges^Note  ,
significantly those that have joined their grownup kids, dad and mom or relations
through family-sponsored
immigration programs.^Note  Overall,
nonetheless, this
dwelling association was much less prevalent amongst latest immigrants^Note  (8.0%) than amongst established
immigrants^Note 
(11.4%).

While some households could type a
multigenerational family for a interval to host a relative staying in Canada
quickly for work, college, or different causes, comparatively few non-permanent
residents lived in these households in 2021 (3.4%).

Among foreign-born
individuals, these born in South Asia^Note 
or Southeast Asia had the best prevalence of dwelling in multigenerational households, at 19.8% and 13.1%,
respectively. In distinction, multigenerational dwelling was comparatively uncommon amongst
individuals born in Western Europe (2.2%), Northern Europe (3.8%), or Africa (4.4%) (Map
2), matching the final patterns noticed among the many diaspora dwelling in different
international locations.^Note 

Data desk for Map 2

Data desk for map 2

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Place of beginning (showing as row headers), , calculated utilizing (showing as column headers).

Place of beginning	p.c
Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
Western Europe	2.2
Northern Europe	3.8
North America (excluding Canada)	4.3
Africa	4.4
Canada	5.3
Eastern Europe	6.4
Central America	7.1
Southern Europe	7.4
West Central Asia and the Middle East	7.8
South America	8.4
Oceania	9.0
Caribbean and Bermuda	10.6
Eastern Asia	11.3
Southeast Asia	13.1
Southern Asia	19.8

Racialized individuals signify greater than half of the
inhabitants dwelling in multigenerational households

In 2021, racialized
individuals^Note 
represented greater than half (52.7%) of Canada’s inhabitants dwelling in multigenerational
households (Table 2). In step with traits noticed by native land, this
dwelling association was most prevalent amongst South Asian individuals, amongst whom
one-fifth resided in multigenerational
households (20.4%)—extra
than triple the share recorded for the final inhabitants.

Apart from Japanese
individuals, all different racialized teams had greater charges of multigenerational
dwelling in 2021 than the remainder of the inhabitants (4.2%).

Among totally different
ethnic or cultural origin teams, multigenerational dwelling was most prevalent
amongst individuals who reported ethnic or cultural origins rooted in South Asia: In
2021, a couple of in three individuals with Sikh (36.6%) or Punjabi (34.2%)
ethnic or cultural origins lived in a multigenerational family; proportions
had been additionally comparatively excessive for individuals with Tamil (21.7%), Pakistani (19.3%),
Indian (19.0%) or Sri Lankan (18.7%) ethnic or cultural origins.

One in ten Indigenous individuals lives in a multigenerational
family

Overall, the
proportion of Indigenous individuals dwelling in multigenerational households was
greater than that of non-Indigenous individuals (10.4% and 6.4%, respectively)
(Chart 6). However, there was appreciable variation within the prevalence of this
dwelling association throughout the Indigenous inhabitants, being most prevalent amongst
Inuit (18.3%) and least prevalent amongst Métis (5.7%).

Data desk for Chart 6

Data desk for chart 6

Table abstract
This desk shows the outcomes of Data desk for chart 6 , calculated utilizing (showing as column headers).

	p.c
Note: The classes of First Nations, Métis and Inuit are restricted to individuals who recognized as just one Indigenous group. Persons who reported a number of Indigenous responses or Indigenous responses not included elsewhere are included within the complete Indigenous id inhabitants. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
Inuit	18.3
Métis	5.7
First Nations	12.8
Total – Indigenous individuals	10.4
Non-Indigenous individuals	6.4

Close to one-quarter of the oldest-generation members of multigenerational
households have no idea English or French properly sufficient to have the ability to conduct a
dialog

Previous research have
discovered that multigenerational households have a better prevalence of a number of
languages being spoken within the dwelling, which displays their comparatively massive dimension
and numerous ethnocultural composition.^Note 
In 2021, near half (45.6%) of people in multigenerational households
had a mom tongue that was a non-official language or a number of non-official
languages—nearly double the speed amongst individuals dwelling in different households (23.2%) (Table 3). This linguistic attribute was most
prevalent among the many oldest technology (56.2%).

The members of the
oldest technology held one other linguistic distinction: In 2021, almost
one-quarter (23.8%) of them couldn’t conduct a dialog in both of
Canada’s two official languages. In distinction, this charge was very low among the many
youngest and center generations (2.4% and a pair of.5%, respectively) or among the many
inhabitants dwelling in different households (1.4%).

For some older
adults, the shortcoming to converse in one in all Canada’s official languages could
create challenges in navigating each day duties, together with social interactions
exterior of the family and the acquisition of products and providers.^Note  It is feasible that multigenerational dwelling could function
a technique to navigate these challenges, with the center technology serving as
a sort of bridge to help their older dad and mom or relations when obligatory.
As proof of this, 36.9% of middle-generation individuals in multigenerational
households reported talking two or extra languages frequently at dwelling
and almost all (97.5%) spoke English or French.

The presence of the
oldest technology within the family may improve the chance of their
co-resident grandchildren talking a non-official language: In 2021, 29.3% of the
youngest-generation members of multigenerational households spoke two or extra
languages at dwelling—significantly greater than the proportion among the many inhabitants
in different households (17.9%).

Fewer working-age adults in multigenerational households
are employed than these in different family varieties

For working-aged
individuals who aren’t engaged in or in search of paid employment, sharing a house with
youthful or older relations could also be a strategy to handle housing bills within the
absence of employment earnings.

Among
adults underneath the age of fifty, these dwelling in multigenerational households had decrease
employment charges^Note 
than their counterparts of the identical age dwelling in different households (Chart 7).
That stated, the magnitude of this distinction various by technology standing. For
instance, amongst individuals aged 25 to 29 in 2021, 68.8% of these forming the
youngest technology in multigenerational households had been employed, in contrast
with 58.1% of middle-generation individuals. In distinction, 76.1% of 25- to
29-year-olds dwelling in different sorts of households had been employed.

Data desk for Chart 7

Data desk for chart 7

Table abstract
The data is grouped by Age group (showing as row headers), Youngest technology in multigenerational households, Middle technology in multigenerational households, Oldest technology in multigenerational households and In different households, calculated utilizing p.c items of measure (showing as column headers).

Age group	Youngest technology in multigenerational households	Middle technology in multigenerational households	Oldest technology in multigenerational households	In different households
	p.c
Note .. not obtainable for a particular reference interval Notes: For choose mixtures of age group and technology standing of individuals in multigenerational households, percentages are omitted attributable to low counts. “Employed” refers to individuals who, in the course of the reference interval, had a labour drive standing of ’employed’. The reference interval was the week of Sunday, May 2 to Saturday, May 8, 2021 For a extra detailed definition, see the entry for “Employed person” in Dictionary, Census of Population, 2021. Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021 (3901).
15 to 19	25.2	24.7	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	34.8
20 to 24	54.2	47.9	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	62.5
25 to 29	68.8	58.1	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	76.1
30 to 34	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	66.9	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	78.7
35 to 39	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	73.8	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	79.7
40 to 44	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	77.6	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	80.7
45 to 49	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	80.0	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	80.6
50 to 54	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	78.8	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	77.7
55 to 59	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	73.3	55.4	69.0
60 to 64	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	60.4	41.7	50.8
65 to 69	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	.. not obtainable for a particular reference interval	20.6	25.9

Alternatively,
some people sharing a house with each their grownup kids and their older
dad and mom would be the main breadwinner within the family or offering monetary
help to each their kids and their dad and mom to some extent. Among adults
aged 50 and over, employment charges had been highest amongst individuals representing the
center technology in multigenerational households. These variations had been
largest amongst individuals approaching the everyday ages of retirement: Among individuals
aged 60 to 64 in 2021, 60.4% of these representing the center technology in a multigenerational
family had been employed, in contrast with 41.7% of these representing the oldest
technology and 50.8% of individuals in different dwelling preparations.

Relatively few multigenerational households are in low
earnings

In
2021, the proportion of multigenerational households that had been in low-income^Note  was
decrease (4.3%) than amongst different sorts of households (15.5%). As multigenerational
households are bigger on common than most households^Note  , their
lesser incidence of low earnings relates partially to the economies of scale that
exist within the relationship between family bills and family dimension.^Note  The
presence of older adults in multigenerational households—who could also be eligible to
obtain earnings advantages similar to Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement—may contribute
to decrease occasion of low-income standing in these households.

Additionally,
near half (49.1%) of all multigenerational households had three or extra
members of the family incomes employment earnings^Note  —extra
than quadruple the proportion in different households^Note 
(11.0%). Having a number of earners in a family additionally signifies that a couple of
individual might contribute to family bills, decreasing the monetary burden on
anybody particular person. That stated, not all of the earners in multigenerational
households will essentially contribute to family bills or contribute
equally. As a consequence, family complete earnings could not precisely replicate the
monetary safety nor the housing affordability of all family members
(Gorski et al. 2025).

Crowded housing situations are extra prevalent amongst
multigenerational households

Reflecting their decrease incidence of family low
earnings, multigenerational households have extra reasonably priced housing on common:
11.1% of multigenerational households in 2021 had been beneath the housing
affordability threshold^Note  ,
almost half the speed noticed amongst different households (20.8%) (Table 4).

In
distinction, crowded housing was a better problem amongst multigenerational
households. In 2021, 28.3% of multigenerational households had been beneath the
housing suitability threshold, which means the dwelling didn’t have sufficient
bedrooms for the scale and composition of the family. The proportion of
crowded housing amongst multigenerational households was greater than six instances
greater than that of different households (4.7%). Most generally, multigenerational
households had a shortfall of 1 bed room (18.5%), whereas 6.4% had a two-bedroom
shortfall and three.4% had a shortfall of three or extra bedrooms.

Overall,
regardless of the economies
of scale and better housing affordability that multigenerational dwelling could provide,
multigenerational households had decrease charges of acceptable housing—that’s, housing that’s concurrently
satisfactory in situation, appropriate in dimension and reasonably priced—than different households, owing
to their better incidence of crowding. Additionally, a bigger share of
multigenerational households (5.9%) lived in housing thought-about unacceptable
attributable to a number of elements—which means the housing failed to satisfy greater than one of many
suitability, affordability, or adequacy thresholds—in comparison with different households
(2.6%).

A
family is in “core housing need” if it falls beneath a minimum of one of many
housing indicator thresholds—adequacy, affordability, or suitability—and would
must spend 30% or extra of its complete before-tax earnings to hire different
native housing that meets all three housing indicator thresholds. Reflecting the truth that most multigenerational
households had enough earnings to afford
acceptable different native housing, fewer of
them had been in core housing want in 2021 than different sorts of households (4.6% and
10.3%, respectively).^Note 

Conclusion

As
Canadian households proceed to evolve, they’re regularly transferring away from the
mid-20^th-century apex of 1 census household dwelling alone in a
dwelling. ^Note 
Urbanization and housing densification have continued to develop alongside
sustained excessive ranges of worldwide entrants, the rise of precarious work,
the financialization of housing and associated affordability and accessibility
challenges, in addition to generational wealth disparities. In this context,
households are more and more dwelling—by selection or by
circumstance—in different preparations, together with the two.4 million people
who lived in multigenerational households in 2021.

In this
first examination of generational variations inside Canada’s multigenerational
households, it was discovered that the sociodemographic and financial traits
of family members various significantly relying on their place because the
youngest, center or oldest technology within the dwelling. Findings recommend that for
some people, sharing a house with a number of generations of their household is a
cultural norm or choice. Others dwelling in multigenerational households could
search out this dwelling association as a way of accessing help from household—to higher
handle the price of dwelling or elevating a younger little one, and even to navigate
obligatory interactions exterior of the house. As Canada’s
inhabitants continues to expertise excessive life expectancy and reducing
fertility, people could more and more rely on vertical household ties
(generationally talking) for help and companionship somewhat than horizontal
ones.^Note 

Multigenerational
households have distinctive housing traits. Most members of multigenerational
households might theoretically afford to pay for different native housing that
could be acceptable, however a considerable share nonetheless stay in crowded
situations. As to why the members of those households could not transfer into
different native housing that’s acceptable, this will replicate preferences to a
sure extent however is extra possible indicative of normal housing shortages or a
scarcity of housing provide geared towards their particular state of affairs (e.g., with an
satisfactory variety of bedrooms). To cut back incidence of undesired crowding, the distinct
housing design wants of individuals dwelling in multigenerational households might be
thought-about within the improvement of helps and insurance policies aimed toward facilitating
redevelopment of present housing or future housing improvement.

This
research was not in a position to study concrete types of caregiving and care receiving
inside multigenerational households. Across many international locations, institutional care
for older adults has change into more and more privatized and expensive for people,
and “ageing in place” —that’s, persevering with to stay in a single’s
non-public family in older maturity—is each publicly
inspired and desired by the Baby Boomers who’re regularly getting into this
stage of life.^Note  The potential for multigenerational
households to function a setting wherein older adults can each obtain and
present casual care is a vital consideration for future analysis.

A limitation
of this research is that the evaluation was restricted to households who share a personal dwelling.
More and extra households are in search of different types of multigenerational
dwelling which provide better privateness for every technology, similar to secondary,
laneway or backyard suites—although they usually meet zoning and different constructing
challenges on this regard.^Note  Moreover, prolonged households who do
not share a house however stay in shut geographic proximity to 1 one other could
operate very similar to a multigenerational family by way of exchanges of
sensible help and companionship.^Note  The prevalence and composition of
these alternate types of multigenerational trade in Canada stay an
essential data hole.

Data sources, strategies and definitions

For
extra details about traits in households, households and dwelling preparations,
see the Families, households and marital
status statistics portal
on the Statistics Canada web site.

This research is predicated on information from
the 2021 Census of Population, and its foremost function is to enumerate
the inhabitants. To be certain that people are counted solely as soon as within the census,
individuals in non-public households are counted as residing at just one dwelling, and
in just one family, by making use of the idea of the “usual place of
residence.”
In flip, census households are recognized based mostly on relationships amongst individuals who
share a common place of residence. A consequence of this method to figuring out
households is that it could not absolutely replicate the complexity of household and
family traits, particularly for individuals who break up their time between
two or extra residences. For extra data on these concerns, see the
appendix of the Families, Households
and Marital Status Reference Guide, Census of Population, 2021.

Given
that the non-binary inhabitants is small, information aggregation to a two-category
gender variable is usually obligatory to guard the confidentiality of
responses supplied. In these circumstances, people within the class
“non-binary persons” are distributed into the opposite two gender
classes. In this research, the class “women”” contains girls, as
properly as some non-binary individuals, and the class “men” contains males,
in addition to some non-binary individuals.

Key ideas and definitions

The time period technology can have totally different meanings
relying on social phenomenon being examined. For instance, a demographic
technology is a bunch of individuals born inside a particular vary of years who
have grown up in a shared social, financial or political context—such because the
Millennial technology. Generation standing will also be used within the context of
immigration, e.g., a “second-generation Canadian” is somebody who was born in
Canada and has a minimum of one guardian born exterior of Canada. In this research, the
time period “generation” refers to relationships inside a household.

Multigenerational
family refers to a family wherein:

• 
  there
  is a minimum of one one that is each the grandparent of an individual within the family
  and the guardian of one other individual in the identical family, or




• 
  there
  is a minimum of one one that is each the kid of an individual within the family and
  the grandchild of one other individual in the identical family.

In a family consisting of a kid, the kid’s mom and
the kid’s grandmother, the kid is taken into account the youngest technology,
the kid’s mom the center technology and the grandmother the oldest
technology. In households with 4 or extra generations current, members of
the multigenerational household who’re neither the youngest nor the oldest
technology are categorized as the center technology.

Census
household
refers to a few household (with or with out kids) or a one-parent household.
The members of the family should share a common place of residence (stay in the identical
dwelling). Children could also be organic or adopted kids of any age, supplied
they don’t have their very own partner, associate or little one dwelling in the identical
dwelling. Grandchildren dwelling with their grandparent(s) and with no dad and mom
current additionally represent a census household.

Child in a census household refers
to an individual of any age whose common place of residence is similar dwelling as
their guardian(s), in addition to to grandchildren dwelling in households with
grandparent(s) with no dad and mom current. Individuals who’re dwelling with their
married partner or common-law associate, or with a number of of their very own
kids, aren’t thought-about to be members of the census household of their
guardian(s), even when they’re dwelling in the identical family.

Census household standing of individual refers
as to whether an individual who’s a member of a census household is a married partner or
common-law associate (with or with out kids), a guardian in a one-parent household,
or a baby. Census household standing is prioritized for the youngest technology in
households with two-or-more generations of the identical household. Table 5 gives
two examples of how census households are shaped based mostly on the family
relationships inside multigenerational households, following the rule of
prioritizing the youngest technology.

Family and family traits of individual refers back to the relationship between an individual and the opposite
members of their family. Specifically, emphasis is positioned on whether or not they
are a member of a census household— a pair household, with or with out kids, or
a one-parent household—or if not in a census household, whether or not they’re dwelling with
relations, with non-relatives solely, or alone.

References

Amorim, M. (2019). Are grandparents a blessing or a burden? Multigenerational coresidence and child-related spending. Social Science Research 80: 132-144.

Burgess, G. and Muir, Okay. (2019). The increase in multigenerational households in the UK: The motivations for and experiences of multigenerational living. Housing, Theory and Society 37(3): 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1653360

Carpino, T. (2024). Prevalence of low earnings amongst individuals in one-parent households headed by an immigrant guardian: An intersectional evaluation. Studies on Gender and Intersecting Identities. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 45200002.

Choi, Okay. H. and Ramaj, S. (2023). Multigenerational living and children’s risk of living in unaffordable housing: differences by ethnicity and parents’ marital status. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(13): 3267-3288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2171974

Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. (2019). Inuit Nunangat Housing Strategy. Catalogue quantity R5-737/2019 E-PDF.

De Oliveira, M.C.G.M., Salmazo-Silva, H., Gomes, L., Moraes, C.F. and Alves, V.P. (2020). Elderly people in multigenerational households: Family composition, satisfaction with life and social involvement.  Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 37, e180081.

Di Gessa, G., Zaninotto, P. and Glaser, Okay. (2020). Looking after grandchildren: gender differences in ‘when,’ ‘what,’ and ‘why’: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Demographic Research 43(53): 1465-1482. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.53

Drolet, M. and Rauh, Okay. (2024). Closing the hole? Assessing the labour market outcomes of unpartnered moms in Canada. Insights on Canadian Society. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 75-006-X.

Easthope, H, Liu, E., Burnley, I. and Judd, B. (2016). Changing perceptions of family: A study of multigenerational households. Journal of Sociology 53(1): 182-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316635

Easthope, H. (2017).  The drivers of multigenerational households in Australia. Chapter 3 in Multigenerational Family Living: Evidence and Policy Implications from Australia. Routledge Advances in Sociology. Eds. E. Liu and H. Easthope. Routledge.

Ghosh, A.Okay., Venkatraman, S., Soroka, O., Reshetnyak, E.  et al. (2021). Association between overcrowded households, multigenerational households, and COVID-19: a cohort study. Public Health 198: 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.039

Goodbrand, P., Humphrey, T. and Gondek, J. (2017). Relatives or rentals? Secondary suites through a multigenerational family lens. The Canadian Geographer 61(4); 525-539. DOI: 10.1111/cag.12399

Gorski, A., Heisel, D. and Situ, J. (2025). Measuring unmet housing want and housing instability in households with roommates and prolonged household. Housing Statistics in Canada. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 46-28-0001.

He, W. and Jia, S. (2022). Exploring multigenerational co-residence in the United States. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 17(1). DOI: 10.1108/IJHMA-06-2022-0089

Hertog, E. and Kan, M-Y. (2021). Married Adults Coresiding with Older Parents: Implications for Paid Work and Domestic Workloads. Journal of Population Ageing 14: 507-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-021-09346-2

Hogendoorn, B. and Härkönen, J. (2023). Single Motherhood and Multigenerational Coresidence in Europe. Population and Development Review 49(1): 105-133. 

Kamiya, Y. and Hertog, S. (2020). Measuring family and dwelling preparations of older individuals all over the world: The United Nations Database on the Households and Living Arrangements of Older Persons 2019. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Technical Paper no. no. 2020/03.

Kragiannaki, E. and Burchardt, T. (2022). Living preparations, intra-household inequality and kids’s deprivation: Evidence from EU-SILC. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, the London School of Economics and Political Science. CASE/227.

Lauster, N. and von Bergmann, J. (2025). The new rules: housing shortage as an explanation for family and household change across large metro areas in Canada,1981–2021. The History of the Family 1–30. DOI: 10.1080/1081602X.2024.2448986

Leopold, T. and Skopek, J. (2015). The demography of grandparenthood: An international profile. Social Forces 94(2): 801-832. doi: 10.1093/sf/sov066

Leopold, T., Becker, C.C., Buyukkececi, Z., Çineli, B. and Raab, M. (2024). KINMATRIX: A new data resource for studies of families and kinship. Demographic Research 51(25): 789-808.

Liu, E. (2017). Living with the prolonged household: Experiences and outcomes of dwelling in multigenerational households. Chapter 5 in Multigenerational Family Living: Evidence and Policy Implications from Australia. Routledge Advances in Sociology. Eds. E. Liu and H. Easthope. Routledge.

Liu, E.  (2020). Ageing in multigenerational households: the case of Australia. Chapter 13 in Ageing in Place: Design, Planning and Policy Response in the Western Asia Pacific. Eds. B. Judd, Okay. Tanoue and E. Liu. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976091

Maroto, M. (2017). When the kids live at home: Coresidence, parental assets and economic insecurity. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(4): 1041-1059.  https://www.jstor.org/secure/26646129

Mazurik, Okay., Knudson, S. and Tanaka, Y. (2020). Stuck in the nest? A review of the literature on coresidence in Canada and the United States. Marriage and Family Review 56(6):  491-512.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2020.1728005

Mehdi, T. (2023). A cross-cohort comparison of the economic impact of divorce and widowhood on seniors. Economic and Social Reports. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 36-28-0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202300400003-eng

Milan, A., Laflamme, N. and Wong, I. (2015). Diversity of grandparents dwelling with their grandchildren. Insights on Canadian Society. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 75-006-X.

Minardi, S. (2025). Sociodemographic variation in family structures and geographic proximity between adult children and parents in Europe. Demographic Research 52(25): 849-868. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.25

Mitchell, B.A. and Li, L. (2023). Diversity in Canadian households: Choices, constraints, and social coverage dimensions.  Chapter 2 in The Changing Faces of Families: Diverse Family Forms in Various Policy Contexts. Eds: Marina A. Adler and Karl Lenz. Routledge Studies in Family Sociology. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9781003193500-2

Muennig, P., Jiao, B. and Singer, E. (2018). Living with parents or grandparents increases social capital and survival: 2014 General Social Survey-National Death Index. Social Science and Medicine – Population Health 4: 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.11.001

Park, S.S., Wiemers, E.E. and Seltzer, J.A. (2020). The family safety net of black and white multigenerational families. Population and Development Review 45(2): 351-378. doi:10.1111/padr.12233.

Pilkauskas, N.V., Amorim, M. and Dunifon, R.E. (2020). Historical trends in children living in multigenerational households in the United States: 1870-2018. Demography 57: 2269-2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00920-5

Statistics Canada (2017).  Census in Brief: Children with an immigrant background: Bridging cultures. Census in Brief. Statistics Canada catalogue quantity 98-200-X, subject 2016015.

Statistics Canada (2020). Family Matters: Family ties: How usually do grownup kids see their dad and mom? Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-627-M.

Statistics Canada (2022a). Home alone: More individuals dwelling solo than ever earlier than, however roomies the quickest rising family kind. The Daily. July 13, 2022.

Statistics Canada (2022b). Canada in 2041: A bigger, extra numerous inhabitants with better variations between areas. The Daily. September 8, 2022.

Statistics Canada (2022c). In the midst of excessive job vacancies and traditionally low unemployment, Canada faces file retirements from an getting old labour drive: variety of seniors aged 65 and older grows six instances quicker than kids 0-14. The Daily. April 27, 2022.

Statistics Canada (2022d). Housing conditions among First Nations people, Métis and Inuit in Canada from the 2021 Census. Census in Brief. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 98-200-X, subject 2021007.

Statistics Canada (2022e). A generational portrait of Canada’s aging population from the 2021 Census. The Daily. April 27, 2022.

Statistics Canada (2022f). Disaggregated trends in poverty from the 2021 Census of Population. Census in Brief. Statistics Canada catalogue quantity 98-200-X, subject 2021009.

Statistics Canada (2023). Multilingualism of Canadian households. Census in Brief. Statistics Canada catalogue quantity 98-200-X, subject 2021014.

Tang, J., Galbraith, N. and Truong, J. (2019). Living alone in Canada. Insights on Canadian Society. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 75-006-X.

Verbist, G., Diris, R. and Vanderbroucke, F. (2020). Solidarity between generations in extended families: Old-age income as a way out of child poverty? European Sociological Review 36(2): 317-332. 

Zhu, Y., Yuan, Y., Gu, J. and Fu, Q. (2023). Neoliberalization and inequality: Disparities in access to affordable housing in urban Canada 1871-2016. Housing Studies 38(10): 18660-1887.