This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you'll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow: https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/litigation/flick-intelligence-v-jam-city-mobile-gaming-patent-infringement-case-patsnap/and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us [ad_1] Patent Litigation Flick Intelligence, LLC asserted US9465451B2 towards Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive cell recreation within the Western District of Texas. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all claims with out prejudice earlier than Jam City answered, leaving the patent out there for future assertion. Each get together bore its personal prices. Resolution time 139days Resolved in 139 days — properly beneath the median for contested patent instances in W.D. Tex. Patents asserted 1 US9465451B2 — Jurassic World Alive cell recreation; gaming software interplay expertise Outcome Dismissed Without prejudice — Flick Intelligence could refile the identical claims towards Jam City Cost ruling Own prices Each get together bears its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges — no price award made Published by PatSnap Insights Team · May 8, 2026 Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data Overview Case particulars Patent evaluation Similar instances Case overview Early pre-answer dismissal in cell gaming patent dispute, W.D. Texas On 7 September 2023, Flick Intelligence, LLC filed an infringement motion towards Jam City within the Western District of Texas (Case No. 6:23-cv-00653), earlier than Chief Judge Alan D. Albright. The asserted patent was US9465451B2, and the accused merchandise had been Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive recreation and associated gaming functions and techniques. Flick Intelligence was represented by Ramey LLP, a agency often energetic within the W.D. Texas patent docket. On 24 January 2024 — simply 139 days after submitting — Flick Intelligence filed a discover of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), out there as of proper as a result of Jam City had neither answered the criticism nor filed a movement for abstract judgment. The dismissal was expressly said to be with out prejudice as to the asserted patent. Each get together was directed to bear its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges, in step with the default Rule 41 place the place no price order is sought. The pre-answer timing is commercially vital: dismissal beneath Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) requires no courtroom approval and leaves no adjudication on the deserves. The public report doesn't disclose whether or not a settlement, licence settlement, or strategic reassessment drove the withdrawal. The without-prejudice designation means US9465451B2 stays a reside enforcement asset — Jam City and others within the cell gaming sector can't deal with this submitting as a remaining decision of their publicity beneath this patent. Case at a look Case no.6:23-cv-00653 PlaintiffFlick Intelligence, LLC DefendantJam City CourtTexas Western JudgeAlan D Albright FiledSeptember 7, 2023 ClosedJanuary 24, 2024 Duration139 days OutcomeVoluntarily dismissed Verdict triggerInfringement Action BasisVoluntary dismissal Case knowledge sourced from PACER / Texas Western District Court by way of PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore similar cases ↗ Case timelineFiling to decision in 139 daysResolved in 139 days — properly beneath the median for contested patent instances in W.D. Tex. Case timeline: Complaint filed May 13 2025, NOV–DEC — 139 days complete Horizontal timeline displaying the three key occasions in Flick Intelligence, LLC v Jam City from submitting to voluntary dismissal. Source: PACER, Texas Western District Court. SEP 7 2023 Complaint filed NOV–DEC 2023 Pre-trial proceedings JAN 24 2024 Dismissed with prejudice 139 DAYS TOTAL Dismissal phrasesVoluntary dismissal with out prejudice — what the report reveals and what it leaves open Legal mechanism Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): dismissal as of proper, no courtroom approval wanted Because Jam City had not but answered or filed a dispositive movement, Flick Intelligence may file a discover of voluntary dismissal unilaterally beneath FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This mechanism requires no judicial sign-off and is efficient instantly upon submitting. It is often used when events attain an off-docket decision or when a plaintiff elects to pause litigation earlier than incurring additional expense. FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Prejudice standing Without prejudice: the patent stays an energetic enforcement instrument The dismissal is expressly with out prejudice as to the asserted patent, which means no declare was selected the deserves and Flick Intelligence retains the suitable to reassert US9465451B2 towards Jam City or some other defendant. The public report doesn't disclose whether or not a confidential licence or settlement underlies this submitting — the without-prejudice designation alone doesn't resolve that query both method. No deserves adjudication Cost allocation Each get together bears personal prices — no fee-shifting triggered The dismissal discover specifies that every get together shall bear its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges. This is the usual Rule 41 default the place neither get together seeks a price order. It additionally means no § 285 exceptional-case fee-shifting movement was pursued by Jam City — in step with the early, pre-answer posture of the dismissal. No charge award Enforcement sign Ramey LLP’s submitting sample: W.D. Texas quantity filer on gaming patents Ramey LLP is among the highest-volume plaintiff-side patent filers within the Western District of Texas. Pre-answer voluntary dismissals on this agency’s caseload can sign profitable early licensing decision, portfolio reassessment, or strategic reloading earlier than refiling. Gaming sector defendants dealing with Ramey LLP complaints ought to deal with early decision as a believable however unconfirmed end result driver reasonably than an indicator of patent weak spot. PAE enforcement sample Legal evaluation primarily based on PACER docket information for case 6:23-cv-00653 and PatSnap Eureka litigation intelligence Search PatSnap Eureka ↗ Parties and illustrationFull get together and counsel info RoleNameTypeDetail PlaintiffFlick Intelligence, LLCCompanyPatent assertion entity — holder of US9465451B2 (gaming software interplay expertise)Search in Eureka ↗ DefendantJam CityCompanyJam City — cell gaming developer and writer; creator of Jurassic World AliveSearch in Eureka ↗ Plaintiff counselJeffrey Eugene KubiakAttorneyCounsel for Flick Intelligence, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗Plaintiff counselWilliam P. Ramey , IIIAttorneyCounsel for Flick Intelligence, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ Defendant counselChristopher S. PonderAttorneyCounsel for Jam CitySearch in Eureka ↗Defendant counselHarper S. BattsAttorneyCounsel for Jam CitySearch in Eureka ↗ Presiding decideJudge Alan D AlbrightChief JudgeTexas Western District Court — Chief JudgeSearch in Eureka ↗ Official verdictStipulation of dismissal — official textual content “Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, Flick Intelligence, LLC, files this notice of voluntary dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as defendant has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the asserted patent. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.” Source: PACER Docket, Case 6:23-cv-00653, Texas Western District Court · Filed January 24, 2024 The dismissal discover invokes Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) exactly — signalling Jam City had not but filed any responsive pleading, giving Flick Intelligence the unilateral proper to exit. The express without-prejudice carve-out as to the asserted patent is deliberate drafting: it preserves each infringement declare for future use. The own-costs provision forecloses any charge movement. Together, this language is in step with a confidential decision or a tactical pause, however the public report helps neither conclusion definitively. Patent at concernUS9465451B2 — Mobile Gaming Application Interaction Technology Publication No.US9465451B2Application No.US13/413859Patent particularsAssigneeFlick Intelligence, LLCProductUS9465451B2 — Jurassic World Alive; gaming software interplay techniquesPublication kindB2 — grant (with prior publication)Cited in motionSeptember 7, 2023 US9465451B2 (software quantity US13/413859) covers expertise within the cell gaming interplay house, asserted right here towards Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive recreation and associated gaming software techniques. The patent sits inside a technical area that sometimes encompasses user-device interplay mechanics — probably together with gesture, sensor, or location-based inputs used to drive gameplay occasions. The software quantity suggests a submitting timeline in step with the early smartphone gaming period, when foundational interaction-layer patents had been actively prosecuted. For the cell gaming sector, a patent of this sort carries significant strategic weight. Jurassic World Alive is a location-aware, augmented-reality-adjacent cell recreation — a product class that depends closely on device-sensor integration and real-time interplay logic. If US9465451B2 claims learn on these mechanics, the patent is probably related to a large class of AR and location-based cell video games past Jam City’s portfolio. The without-prejudice dismissal leaves this query totally unresolved, making the patent a seamless threat asset for the sector. Freedom to functionShould your gaming product run an FTO towards US9465451B2? Any R&D or product group constructing cell video games that incorporate gesture-based controls, sensor-driven gameplay, location-aware mechanics, or augmented actuality interplay layers ought to assess their publicity to US9465451B2. The incontrovertible fact that this patent survived to litigation — and was dismissed with out prejudice reasonably than invalidated — means it has not been stress-tested by declare building or IPR. Products with function overlaps to Jurassic World Alive are the clearest candidates for an FTO overview. PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent permits IP groups to map the claims of US9465451B2 towards your particular product function set, establish prior artwork that might help an IPR problem, and monitor for associated continuation filings from Flick Intelligence’s portfolio. Claim monitoring for this patent household is especially advisable given the without-prejudice dismissal — the following assertion could arrive with much less pre-litigation discover than this case offered. PatSnap Eureka FTO Search Run a freedom-to-operate evaluation on US9465451B2 to evaluate your product’s publicity Run FTO in Eureka → Related litigationSimilar cell gaming patent infringement instances in W.D. TexasPatSnap Eureka tracks associated litigation throughout truck physique gear, car equipment, and comparable infringement actions within the Georgia district system. Truck physique gear · Georgia Related gear producer v competitor Similar voluntary dismissal within the specialty truck physique house after 112-day proceedings. Patent holder and defendant reached confidential licensing phrases. Settled · 112 days Vehicle accent · eleventh Circuit Utility car gear patent infringement Comparable Jurassic World Alive game-adjacent infringement motion within the eleventh Circuit. Design patent vs utility patent enforcement dynamics analysed in depth. Active · District Court Lawn gear · Southeast Lawn truck physique system commerce gown dispute Trade gown and utility patent mixed motion involving garden and landscaping truck producers. Decided on abstract judgment after 9 months. Decided · Summary judgment Flick Intelligence, LLC · Prior actions Flick Intelligence, LLC’s broader IP enforcement historical past Flick Intelligence, LLC’s full litigation historical past masking prior enforcement, licensing exercise, and inter partes overview proceedings. Portfolio view 🔍 Access 40+ related instances in PatSnap Eureka Flick Intelligence, LLC patent enforcement historical past, Texas Western case historical past, Flick Intelligence, LLC’s full IP portfolio, and comparable case evaluation PAE v. cell AR recreationRamey LLP W.D. Texas instancesGaming interplay patentsRule 41 pre-answer dismissals Unlock related instances in Eureka → Strategic implicationsWhat this case indicators for the cell gaming IP panoramaA pre-answer dismissal with out prejudice leaves each substantive query open. Gaming builders and IP groups ought to take the suitable classes — not assume closure. Without-prejudice dismissal means US9465451B2 remains to be reside — plan accordingly Jam City obtained no invalidity ruling, no non-infringement discovering, and no licence on the general public report. Any cell gaming developer whose merchandise contact the expertise claimed in US9465451B2 ought to deal with this patent as an energetic enforcement threat. The 139-day lifecycle of this case is just too quick to have produced any declare building or prior artwork evaluation that might help future defendants. W.D. Texas stays a high-activity venue for gaming patent assertions Chief Judge Albright’s docket continues to draw patent assertion entities concentrating on app-based and cell gaming merchandise. Companies with significant gaming software portfolios — significantly these that includes location-based, augmented actuality, or interaction-layer mechanics — face elevated submitting threat on this venue. Monitoring Ramey LLP’s submitting exercise in W.D. Texas is a sensible early-warning measure. US9465451B2 declare scope: which gaming mechanics are literally in danger A claim-level evaluation of US9465451B2 towards present cell gaming interplay patterns — together with gesture recognition, device-sensor-driven gameplay, and AR-layer triggers — would establish which product options are most definitely to be focused in any future assertion. This evaluation is materials for any developer constructing on related mechanic architectures to Jurassic World Alive. Flick Intelligence’s broader portfolio: is US9465451B2 one among a number of weapons? Patent assertion entities holding one asserted patent often maintain associated continuation or members of the family. A full portfolio evaluation of Flick Intelligence’s holdings may reveal extra pending or granted patents that reach past US9465451B2 — related intelligence for any gaming firm assessing its publicity earlier than a requirement letter arrives. 🔒 Full strategic evaluation in PatSnap Eureka Includes sector IP developments, Judge Treadwell’s case historical past, and FTO threat evaluation for the truck gear house Claim-level threat mappingFlick Intelligence portfolio depthRamey LLP submitting velocity pattern Unlock full evaluation → Frequently requested questions Flick v Jam — key questions answered What occurred in Flick Intelligence v. Jam City, Case No. 6:23-cv-00653?+ Flick Intelligence, LLC filed a patent infringement motion towards Jam City within the Western District of Texas on 7 September 2023, asserting US9465451B2 towards the Jurassic World Alive cell recreation. On 24 January 2024, Flick Intelligence voluntarily dismissed all claims with out prejudice beneath FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with every get together bearing its personal prices. No deserves resolution was reached. What does ‘dismissed without prejudice’ imply for Flick Intelligence v. Jam City?+ A without-prejudice dismissal means no claims had been selected the deserves and Flick Intelligence retains the suitable to refile the identical infringement claims primarily based on US9465451B2 towards Jam City or some other defendant. Jam City obtained no invalidity ruling or non-infringement discovering. The public report doesn't disclose whether or not a personal settlement or licence was reached alongside the dismissal. Which patent did Flick Intelligence assert towards Jam City?+ Flick Intelligence asserted US9465451B2 (software quantity US13/413859) — a patent masking cell gaming software interplay expertise. The accused merchandise had been Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive recreation and associated gaming software techniques. The patent stays in drive and was not challenged by IPR or declare building proceedings throughout this litigation. Why did Flick Intelligence file a voluntary dismissal earlier than Jam City answered?+ The public report doesn't state the rationale. Dismissal beneath Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is obtainable as of proper earlier than the defendant solutions, requiring no courtroom approval. Common drivers embrace confidential licensing decision, strategic portfolio reassessment, or a call to refile with amended claims. The without-prejudice designation preserves all future choices for Flick Intelligence. Is US9465451B2 nonetheless a threat for different cell gaming corporations after this case?+ Yes. The dismissal was with out prejudice and no courtroom has dominated on the validity or scope of US9465451B2. Developers of cell video games that includes gesture-based controls, sensor-driven mechanics, location-aware gameplay, or AR interplay layers ought to think about an FTO evaluation towards this patent. Flick Intelligence’s proper to say the patent towards Jam City or new defendants is totally intact. Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can reply them immediately from patent and litigation knowledge. Ask Eureka ↗ PatSnap Eureka Run a patent threat evaluation to your gaming product US9465451B2 stays assertable after this dismissal. Use PatSnap Eureka to run an FTO search towards your product’s interplay mechanics and monitor for brand spanking new filings from this patent household. [ad_2] This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you'll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow: https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/litigation/flick-intelligence-v-jam-city-mobile-gaming-patent-infringement-case-patsnap/and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us