Flick Intelligence v. Jam City — Mobile Gaming Patent Infringement Case | PatSnap

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/litigation/flick-intelligence-v-jam-city-mobile-gaming-patent-infringement-case-patsnap/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us


Patent Litigation

Flick Intelligence, LLC asserted US9465451B2 towards Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive cell recreation within the Western District of Texas. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all claims with out prejudice earlier than Jam City answered, leaving the patent out there for future assertion. Each get together bore its personal prices.

Resolution time

139days

Resolved in 139 days — properly beneath the median for contested patent instances in W.D. Tex.

Patents asserted

1

US9465451B2 — Jurassic World Alive cell recreation; gaming software interplay expertise

Outcome

Dismissed

Without prejudice — Flick Intelligence could refile the identical claims towards Jam City

Cost ruling

Own prices

Each get together bears its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges — no price award made

Published by PatSnap Insights Team · Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data

Case overview

Early pre-answer dismissal in cell gaming patent dispute, W.D. Texas

On 7 September 2023, Flick Intelligence, LLC filed an infringement motion towards Jam City within the Western District of Texas (Case No. 6:23-cv-00653), earlier than Chief Judge Alan D. Albright. The asserted patent was US9465451B2, and the accused merchandise had been Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive recreation and associated gaming functions and techniques. Flick Intelligence was represented by Ramey LLP, a agency often energetic within the W.D. Texas patent docket.

On 24 January 2024 — simply 139 days after submitting — Flick Intelligence filed a discover of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), out there as of proper as a result of Jam City had neither answered the criticism nor filed a movement for abstract judgment. The dismissal was expressly said to be with out prejudice as to the asserted patent. Each get together was directed to bear its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges, in step with the default Rule 41 place the place no price order is sought.

The pre-answer timing is commercially vital: dismissal beneath Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) requires no courtroom approval and leaves no adjudication on the deserves. The public report doesn’t disclose whether or not a settlement, licence settlement, or strategic reassessment drove the withdrawal. The without-prejudice designation means US9465451B2 stays a reside enforcement asset — Jam City and others within the cell gaming sector can’t deal with this submitting as a remaining decision of their publicity beneath this patent.

Case at a look

Case no.6:23-cv-00653

PlaintiffFlick Intelligence, LLC

DefendantJam City

CourtTexas Western

JudgeAlan D Albright

FiledSeptember 7, 2023

ClosedJanuary 24, 2024

Duration139 days

OutcomeVoluntarily dismissed

Verdict triggerInfringement Action

BasisVoluntary dismissal

Case knowledge sourced from PACER / Texas Western District Court by way of PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore similar cases ↗

Case timeline

Filing to decision in 139 days

Resolved in 139 days — properly beneath the median for contested patent instances in W.D. Tex.

Case timeline: Complaint filed May 13 2025, NOV–DEC — 139 days complete Horizontal timeline displaying the three key occasions in Flick Intelligence, LLC v Jam City from submitting to voluntary dismissal. Source: PACER, Texas Western District Court. SEP 7 2023 Complaint filed NOV–DEC 2023 Pre-trial proceedings JAN 24 2024 Dismissed with prejudice 139 DAYS TOTAL

Dismissal phrases

Voluntary dismissal with out prejudice — what the report reveals and what it leaves open

Legal mechanism

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): dismissal as of proper, no courtroom approval wanted

Because Jam City had not but answered or filed a dispositive movement, Flick Intelligence may file a discover of voluntary dismissal unilaterally beneath FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This mechanism requires no judicial sign-off and is efficient instantly upon submitting. It is often used when events attain an off-docket decision or when a plaintiff elects to pause litigation earlier than incurring additional expense.

FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Prejudice standing

Without prejudice: the patent stays an energetic enforcement instrument

The dismissal is expressly with out prejudice as to the asserted patent, which means no declare was selected the deserves and Flick Intelligence retains the suitable to reassert US9465451B2 towards Jam City or some other defendant. The public report doesn’t disclose whether or not a confidential licence or settlement underlies this submitting — the without-prejudice designation alone doesn’t resolve that query both method.

No deserves adjudication

Cost allocation

Each get together bears personal prices — no fee-shifting triggered

The dismissal discover specifies that every get together shall bear its personal prices, bills, and attorneys’ charges. This is the usual Rule 41 default the place neither get together seeks a price order. It additionally means no § 285 exceptional-case fee-shifting movement was pursued by Jam City — in step with the early, pre-answer posture of the dismissal.

No charge award

Enforcement sign

Ramey LLP’s submitting sample: W.D. Texas quantity filer on gaming patents

Ramey LLP is among the highest-volume plaintiff-side patent filers within the Western District of Texas. Pre-answer voluntary dismissals on this agency’s caseload can sign profitable early licensing decision, portfolio reassessment, or strategic reloading earlier than refiling. Gaming sector defendants dealing with Ramey LLP complaints ought to deal with early decision as a believable however unconfirmed end result driver reasonably than an indicator of patent weak spot.

PAE enforcement sample

Legal evaluation primarily based on PACER docket information for case 6:23-cv-00653 and PatSnap Eureka litigation intelligence Search PatSnap Eureka ↗

Parties and illustration

Full get together and counsel info

Role Name Type Detail
Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC Company Patent assertion entity — holder of US9465451B2 (gaming software interplay expertise)Search in Eureka ↗
Defendant Jam City Company Jam City — cell gaming developer and writer; creator of Jurassic World AliveSearch in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counsel Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak Attorney Counsel for Flick Intelligence, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counsel William P. Ramey , III Attorney Counsel for Flick Intelligence, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counsel Christopher S. Ponder Attorney Counsel for Jam CitySearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counsel Harper S. Batts Attorney Counsel for Jam CitySearch in Eureka ↗
Presiding decide Judge Alan D Albright Chief Judge Texas Western District Court — Chief JudgeSearch in Eureka ↗

Official verdict

Stipulation of dismissal — official textual content

“Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, Flick Intelligence, LLC, files this notice of voluntary dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as defendant has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the asserted patent. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”

Source: PACER Docket, Case 6:23-cv-00653, Texas Western District Court · Filed January 24, 2024

The dismissal discover invokes Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) exactly — signalling Jam City had not but filed any responsive pleading, giving Flick Intelligence the unilateral proper to exit. The express without-prejudice carve-out as to the asserted patent is deliberate drafting: it preserves each infringement declare for future use. The own-costs provision forecloses any charge movement. Together, this language is in step with a confidential decision or a tactical pause, however the public report helps neither conclusion definitively.

Patent at concern

US9465451B2 — Mobile Gaming Application Interaction Technology

Publication No.US9465451B2

Application No.US13/413859

Patent particulars

AssigneeFlick Intelligence, LLC

ProductUS9465451B2 — Jurassic World Alive; gaming software interplay techniques

Publication kindB2 — grant (with prior publication)

Cited in motionSeptember 7, 2023

US9465451B2 (software quantity US13/413859) covers expertise within the cell gaming interplay house, asserted right here towards Jam City’s Jurassic World Alive recreation and associated gaming software techniques. The patent sits inside a technical area that sometimes encompasses user-device interplay mechanics — probably together with gesture, sensor, or location-based inputs used to drive gameplay occasions. The software quantity suggests a submitting timeline in step with the early smartphone gaming period, when foundational interaction-layer patents had been actively prosecuted.

For the cell gaming sector, a patent of this sort carries significant strategic weight. Jurassic World Alive is a location-aware, augmented-reality-adjacent cell recreation — a product class that depends closely on device-sensor integration and real-time interplay logic. If US9465451B2 claims learn on these mechanics, the patent is probably related to a large class of AR and location-based cell video games past Jam City’s portfolio. The without-prejudice dismissal leaves this query totally unresolved, making the patent a seamless threat asset for the sector.

Freedom to function

Should your gaming product run an FTO towards US9465451B2?

Any R&D or product group constructing cell video games that incorporate gesture-based controls, sensor-driven gameplay, location-aware mechanics, or augmented actuality interplay layers ought to assess their publicity to US9465451B2. The incontrovertible fact that this patent survived to litigation — and was dismissed with out prejudice reasonably than invalidated — means it has not been stress-tested by declare building or IPR. Products with function overlaps to Jurassic World Alive are the clearest candidates for an FTO overview.

PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent permits IP groups to map the claims of US9465451B2 towards your particular product function set, establish prior artwork that might help an IPR problem, and monitor for associated continuation filings from Flick Intelligence’s portfolio. Claim monitoring for this patent household is especially advisable given the without-prejudice dismissal — the following assertion could arrive with much less pre-litigation discover than this case offered.

PatSnap Eureka FTO Search

Run a freedom-to-operate evaluation on US9465451B2 to evaluate your product’s publicity

Run FTO in Eureka →

Related litigation

Similar cell gaming patent infringement instances in W.D. Texas

PatSnap Eureka tracks associated litigation throughout truck physique gear, car equipment, and comparable infringement actions within the Georgia district system.

🔍

Access 40+ related instances in PatSnap Eureka

Flick Intelligence, LLC patent enforcement historical past, Texas Western case historical past, Flick Intelligence, LLC’s full IP portfolio, and comparable case evaluation

PAE v. cell AR recreationRamey LLP W.D. Texas instancesGaming interplay patentsRule 41 pre-answer dismissals

Unlock related instances in Eureka →

Strategic implications

What this case indicators for the cell gaming IP panorama

A pre-answer dismissal with out prejudice leaves each substantive query open. Gaming builders and IP groups ought to take the suitable classes — not assume closure.

Without-prejudice dismissal means US9465451B2 remains to be reside — plan accordingly

Jam City obtained no invalidity ruling, no non-infringement discovering, and no licence on the general public report. Any cell gaming developer whose merchandise contact the expertise claimed in US9465451B2 ought to deal with this patent as an energetic enforcement threat. The 139-day lifecycle of this case is just too quick to have produced any declare building or prior artwork evaluation that might help future defendants.

W.D. Texas stays a high-activity venue for gaming patent assertions

Chief Judge Albright’s docket continues to draw patent assertion entities concentrating on app-based and cell gaming merchandise. Companies with significant gaming software portfolios — significantly these that includes location-based, augmented actuality, or interaction-layer mechanics — face elevated submitting threat on this venue. Monitoring Ramey LLP’s submitting exercise in W.D. Texas is a sensible early-warning measure.

🔒

Full strategic evaluation in PatSnap Eureka

Includes sector IP developments, Judge Treadwell’s case historical past, and FTO threat evaluation for the truck gear house

Claim-level threat mappingFlick Intelligence portfolio depthRamey LLP submitting velocity pattern

Unlock full evaluation →

Frequently requested questions

Flick v Jam — key questions answered

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can reply them immediately from patent and litigation knowledge. Ask Eureka ↗

PatSnap Eureka

Run a patent threat evaluation to your gaming product

US9465451B2 stays assertable after this dismissal. Use PatSnap Eureka to run an FTO search towards your product’s interplay mechanics and monitor for brand spanking new filings from this patent household.


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/litigation/flick-intelligence-v-jam-city-mobile-gaming-patent-infringement-case-patsnap/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us