This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow: https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/cameras/lenses/i-traded-in-my-zoom-lenses-for-a-kit-full-of-prime-lenses-did-i-make-a-mistakeand if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us [ad_1] When I made the choice to change from a full-frame DSLR to an APS-C mirrorless, the choice wasn’t one which I took calmly. One of my greatest compromises? I traded in a equipment that was largely zoom lenses for a bag filled with almost all prime lenses.When I traded in my DSLR for mirrorless, I thought of a handful of various choices, however I fell in love with Fujifilm colours. My greatest hesitation, nevertheless, was that I'd be downsizing my sensor for these colours. As a portrait photographer and lover of bokeh, I didn’t wish to lose gentle and background separation within the swap.My compromise? I traded in a 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom lens for a 50mm f/1 and an 18mm f/1.4. My gear bag for portraits and weddings is now all nearly prime lenses, including the 18mm, 50mm, and a 90mm. I was hesitant enough in the switch from zoom to primes that I made one concession and picked up the 16-80mm f/4 as a kit option, a lens that I still have in my bag. You may like The trade allowed me to gain back some of the light and blur that I lost in making a step down from full-frame to APS-C. Could I have picked a full-frame camera with a bright prime lens? Of course. But the step from a DSLR with zoom to a mirrorless with a prime and less time spent on color editing was the right move for me personally. (Image credit: Future)The biggest thing that I lost in the change was the ability to change focal lengths quickly. Instead, I now shoot with one camera on each hip and a different prime lens mounted on each. No, this isn’t quite the same thing as using zoom lenses, but it helps. Perhaps more importantly, I’m a wedding photographer and shooting a wedding without a backup camera is just asking for disaster, so I was already budgeting to purchase two bodies.Most days, I find I don’t miss zoom. The 50mm f/1 practically lives on one of my camera bodies – it has that just-right focal length, and the bokeh is the stuff dreams are made of. When I’m shooting portraits, I don’t mind having to “zoom” with my feet – and I feel like I put more thought into the shot that way.I do occasionally miss zoom – I took a weekend trip a few weeks ago and that kit lens spent a lot of time on my camera. Zoom is convenient, and there are plenty of scenarios where getting physically closer just isn’t possible. I’ve hovered over the “add to cart” button on the Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Art on more than one occasion. I wish such a lens had existed when I bought my kit (no offense, 16-80mm lens).The best camera deals, reviews, product advice, and unmissable photography news, direct to your inbox!Whether or not a zoom or a prime is the right choice, I think depends in large part on the genre of photography, too. I love my prime for portraits. But I love testing out telephoto zooms for wildlife photography, and if my primary genres were wildlife or sports, my kit bag would have a higher percentage of zooms over primes.When I started out in photography, zoom lenses were my favorite – but if I could only keep one lens in my current kit, it’d be my beloved 50mm f/1.Today's best Fujifilm XF 50mm f/1.0 R WR, Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR, Fuji XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR and Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Art dealsYou may also likeBrowse the best Fujifilm lenses or the best lenses for portraits. [ad_2] This page was created programmatically, to read the article in its original location you can go to the link bellow: https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/cameras/lenses/i-traded-in-my-zoom-lenses-for-a-kit-full-of-prime-lenses-did-i-make-a-mistakeand if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us