UN urged to impose journey ban on Taliban management over oppression of ladies

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/19/un-urged-impose-travel-ban-taliban-leadership-oppression-women
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us


Human rights teams are urging the UN to finish a Trump-era waiver that enables Taliban members most answerable for the oppression of women in Afghanistan to journey overseas.

In a check for the worldwide neighborhood’s willingness to isolate the Taliban, critics argue that these Taliban members curbing ladies’s proper to depart their houses inside Afghanistan ought to at minimal be banned from leaving their nation.

The UN has imposed intensive sanctions towards the Taliban, however the safety council is because of debate subsequent week whether or not to impose a journey ban on all its main members as a manner of signalling that the Taliban’s path to worldwide recognition, not to mention legitimacy, is blocked as long as it continues on its course of driving ladies from public life and teenage ladies out of secondary schooling.

The journey ban expires mechanically on 20 June except the UN renews it, and key figures within the US administration not solely need it renewed, however prolonged. But there’s as but no official US place.

Currently solely 41 members of the Taliban administration are affected by the journey ban after it was partially suspended three years in the past to allow 14 members to take part in peace talks.

Heather Barr, from Human Rights Watch, says at a minimal journey bans must be imposed on three people: Abdul-Haq Wassiq, the top of the intelligence company; Sheikh Muhammad Khalid Hanafi, the top of the ministry for the promotion of advantage and the prevention of vice; and Haibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban’s prime spiritual chief, who reportedly performed a decisive position in extending the ban on girls’ secondary education.

She stated: “It’s a false dichotomy to suggest that ending the travel ban exemption means giving up on engaging the Taliban. It’s time for governments to turn consensus that the Taliban’s actions are unlawful into coordinated actions that show the Taliban that the world is ready to defend the rights of Afghans, particularly women and girls, in meaningful ways.”

The former Swedish overseas minister Margot Wallström has come out in assist of the transfer, saying: “The longstanding UN ban on travel for Taliban leaders carries a waiver for some of them. Meanwhile, Afghan women can hardly leave their homes. The travel ban exemption should not be renewed without conditions: real progress for Afghan women and girls.”

Annie Pforzheimer, a former deputy chief of the US mission to Kabul, has additionally urged the state division to behave. “Suspending the travel ban has allowed the Taliban to pursue the diplomatic recognition it craves, setting in motion the creeping normalisation of an authoritarian and extremist movement that other groups will emulate.”

Critics say the Taliban use abroad visits to mislead diplomats in regards to the potential pluralist trajectory of the Taliban, and it is important that the worldwide neighborhood doesn’t favour engagement for its personal sake. Senior Taliban figures have been final seen in St Petersburg for the international economic forum hosted by Vladimir Putin.

Asila Wardak, an Afghan ladies’s rights activist and former diplomat, stated: “We talk about a travel ban for the Taliban, well, the real travel ban is on Afghan women who are barely allowed to go outside their homes. But still, the Taliban has all the travel benefits it wants despite that.”

Sign as much as First Edition, our free day by day e-newsletter – each weekday morning at 7am BST

In a press release Henrik Thune, the deputy overseas minister of Norway, stated: “The travel ban exemption is first and foremost a tool to facilitate contact with the de facto authorities. In our opinion, this continues to be crucial if we want to influence the trajectory of the future of Afghanistan.” Norway is a member of the UN safety council and pen-holder on the Afghan file on the UN, so its voice is critical.

Edicts limiting the rights of ladies have been pouring out of the Afghan authorities. Most lately, on 17 May, the Taliban dissolved the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, reducing off a vital supply of assist for Afghans dealing with violations of their human rights, together with ladies and ladies experiencing gender-based violence.

Nine days later, the UN particular rapporteur on the human rights state of affairs in Afghanistan concluded his mission by describing current measures as “fitting a pattern of absolute gender segregation … aimed at making women invisible in society”.

Michelle Bachelet, the UN human rights commissioner, made no touch upon the ban in her handle to the UN human rights council, however stated: “What we are witnessing today in Afghanistan is the institutionalised, systematic oppression of women. Limiting women’s freedom of movement negatively impacts almost all aspects of their lives, including the ability of women and their children to access and to participate in health services, livelihood and humanitarian aid.”

The human rights council has but to determine whether or not to have a particular session devoted to the discrimination dealing with Afghan ladies, however there’s stress from Afghan civil society for it to go forward, most likely within the week beginning 4 July.


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/19/un-urged-impose-travel-ban-taliban-leadership-oppression-women
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us

Leave a Reply

You have to agree to the comment policy.

5 × three =