Intel Arc A380 Slower Than GTX 1650, RX 6400 in Gaming Checks | Tom's Hardware

Last week, Intel launched the Arc A380, with merchandise initially accessible in China solely. Today, a number of Chinese websites and social media customers revealed their unbiased third-party opinions. We’ve taken a more in-depth have a look at a video evaluate revealed by Bilibili user Shenmedounengce to see if there may be any perception to share earlier than we are able to get our personal A380 within the Tom’s Hardware labs. In transient, Intel’s first Arc Alchemist desktop GPU seemingly will not displace the best graphics cards, and it did significantly better in artificial benchmarks than the suite of video games examined.

The Bilibili person’s check platform was comparatively modest, which is a good alternative given the goal market of the Arc A380. It’s a Windows 11 PC primarily based round an Intel Core i5-12400, 16GB of RAM, 1TB SSD, and an Asus B660M motherboard, which needs to be ample for supporting the likes of the brand new Arc A380. The Gunnir branded mannequin was used, which seems to be the primary one to be launched. Intel’s new hope was pitted in opposition to the next contenders in the identical system: a GTX 1650, RX 6400, RX 6500 XT, and RTX 3050.

In artificial exams, the Intel Arc A380 was pretty spectacular, beating out all rivals besides the RTX 3050 in Time Spy and Port Royal, however falling again a bit to finest simply the GTX 1650 in Fire Strike. Unfortunately, this marked the tip of the excellent news for these hoping for a formidable Intel Arc debut.

In the six video games examined at 1080p (League of Legends, GTA V, PUGB, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, and Red Dead Redemption 2), Intel’s Arc A380 was persistently the poorest performer. Above, we now have shared a video screenshot of the detailed Red Dead Redemption 2 efficiency comparability. This is a reasonably typical bar chart throughout all of the video games.

There’s additionally a abstract chart with all six video games, although that omits the significantly better efficiency supplied by the RX 6500 XT and RTX 3050.

With the efficiency comparisons above, it’s value trying on the variations within the underlying applied sciences.