Intel Arc A380 Slower Than GTX 1650, RX 6400 in Gaming Checks | Tom's Hardware

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you possibly can go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-arc-a380-gaming-benchmarks
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us


Last week, Intel launched the Arc A380, with merchandise initially accessible in China solely. Today, a number of Chinese websites and social media customers revealed their unbiased third-party opinions. We’ve taken a more in-depth have a look at a video evaluate revealed by Bilibili user Shenmedounengce to see if there may be any perception to share earlier than we are able to get our personal A380 within the Tom’s Hardware labs. In transient, Intel’s first Arc Alchemist desktop GPU seemingly will not displace the best graphics cards, and it did significantly better in artificial benchmarks than the suite of video games examined.

(Image credit score: Shenmedounengce)

The Bilibili person’s check platform was comparatively modest, which is a good alternative given the goal market of the Arc A380. It’s a Windows 11 PC primarily based round an Intel Core i5-12400, 16GB of RAM, 1TB SSD, and an Asus B660M motherboard, which needs to be ample for supporting the likes of the brand new Arc A380. The Gunnir branded mannequin was used, which seems to be the primary one to be launched. Intel’s new hope was pitted in opposition to the next contenders in the identical system: a GTX 1650, RX 6400, RX 6500 XT, and RTX 3050.

(Image credit score: Shenmedounengce)

In artificial exams, the Intel Arc A380 was pretty spectacular, beating out all rivals besides the RTX 3050 in Time Spy and Port Royal, however falling again a bit to finest simply the GTX 1650 in Fire Strike. Unfortunately, this marked the tip of the excellent news for these hoping for a formidable Intel Arc debut.

In the six video games examined at 1080p (League of Legends, GTA V, PUGB, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, and Red Dead Redemption 2), Intel’s Arc A380 was persistently the poorest performer. Above, we now have shared a video screenshot of the detailed Red Dead Redemption 2 efficiency comparability. This is a reasonably typical bar chart throughout all of the video games.

(Image credit score: Shenmedounengce)

There’s additionally a abstract chart with all six video games, although that omits the significantly better efficiency supplied by the RX 6500 XT and RTX 3050.

With the efficiency comparisons above, it’s value trying on the variations within the underlying applied sciences.

Arc A380

Radeon RX 6400

GeForce GTX 1650

Node

TSMC N6

TSMC N6

TSMC 12nm
Architecture

Alchemist

RDNA 2

Turing

GPU

DG2-128EU

Navi 24

TU117

Graphics cores

1,024

768

896

FP32 TFLOPS

5.02

3.57

2.90

Memory 6GB GDDR6 96-bit 15.5Gbps, 192 GB/s 4GB GDDR6 64-bit 16Gbps. 144 GB/s 4GB GDDR5 128-bit 8Gbps, 128 GB/s
TDP/TBP

75 Watt

53 Watt

75 Watt

Video Codecs AV1, H.264, H.265 decode/encode H.264, H.265 decode solely H.264, H.265 decode/encode
Approx Price

$135

$159

$190


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you possibly can go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-arc-a380-gaming-benchmarks
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us

Leave a Reply

You have to agree to the comment policy.

fifteen − four =