This page was generated automatically. To view the article in its initial location, please follow the link below:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.05.25320027v1.full-text
If you wish to remove this article from our website, kindly reach out to us
Abstract
Background By 2023, non-communicable illnesses (NCDs) are projected to be a leading cause of mortality globally. A useful approach for preventing and managing NCDs is the application of health-enhancing lifestyle intervention programs. A vital element related to the acceptance of health-enhancing lifestyle habits is self-efficacy. This review seeks to explore the significance of self-efficacy in promoting health-enhancing lifestyles among individuals with NCDs.
Method A comprehensive literature search was performed in three scientific databases: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This search was aimed at original articles published in English from 2015 to 2024 that recognized health-enhancing lifestyle as an outcome. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools, and the results were synthesized using content analysis.
Results The initial search yielded 308 citations. Eight studies that fulfilled the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools criteria were included, emphasizing the direct impacts of self-efficacy. It was shown that self-efficacy serves as a positive predictor for health-enhancing lifestyle in total, along with the physical activity component, among patients with NCDs, especially those suffering from hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and early stages of cancer.
Limitation All selected studies utilized a cross-sectional design. Consequently, the quality of evidence was relatively low and displayed a significant risk of bias. In addition, there was a language bias as only publications in English were included.
Conclusion The insights from this review will assist healthcare professionals in boosting self-efficacy as a significant positive predictor of health-enhancing lifestyles among individuals with non-communicable illnesses. This strategy can be incorporated into clinical consultations and intervention initiatives. Future research is needed to assess the effectiveness of self-efficacy in fostering a health-promoting lifestyle.
Introduction
Non-communicable disease (NCD) refers to the chronic nature of ailments such as cardiovascular diseases (stroke and myocardial infarction), cancers, diabetes, and chronic respiratory illnesses (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma). NCD is responsible for 74% of global mortality (1). The WHO has launched a Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs (2013–2020), which has now been extended to 2030. This strategy aims to lessen premature deaths caused by NCDs by one-third through efficient prevention and treatment methods, corresponding to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly target 3.4, which aims to mitigate NCD-related fatalities by 2030 (2).
The risk factors for NCDs can be classified into non-modifiable and modifiable influences. Non-modifiable factors include age, sex, and family medical history. Modifiable factors are linked to unhealthy lifestyle practices such as physical inactivity, poor diet, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption (1, 3). Lifestyle encapsulates how an individual lives and signifies the traits representative of a specific time and locale. It encompasses everyday behaviors and roles of individuals regarding work, physical activity, well-being, and nutrition (4). A strategic approach in the prevention and management of NCDs includes promoting initiatives aimed at healthy lifestyle interventions (5), which have shown beneficial effects on health results (6), prevention of NCDs (7–9), reduction of hypertension risks (10), and alleviating the financial burden on healthcare systems (11, 12).
The WHO advocates for a health-enhancing lifestyle by fostering behaviors that mitigate risk factors associated with NCDs (2). A health-enhancing lifestyle is characterized as a multidimensional concept that involves self-initiated actions, diverse levels of behavior, and individuals’ self-perceptions aimed at maintaining or elevating their wellness level, self-actualization, and personal satisfaction (13). This concept leans on behavior, health beliefs (14), and Pender’s health-promotion models (13). A health-enhancing lifestyle fosters health across six dimensions: i) health responsibility, ii) physical activity, iii) nutrition, iv) social interactions, v) spiritual development, and vi) stress management (15, 16). Spiritual development and physical activity reflected the highest and lowest scores, respectively, across health-enhancing lifestyle dimensions (17).
Research has shown that numerous factors are linked to health-enhancing lifestyle practices, such as socio-demographic variables (18, 19), perceptions of illness (20), social support (21), and self-efficacy (9, 22–24). Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s confidence in their capability to carry out behaviors necessary to achieve specific performance objectives (25). Self-efficacy affects patients’ confidence regarding their ability to adopt and sustain healthy lifestyle modifications, which is essential for managing NCDs. It is one of the dimensions of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The application of SCT in managing NCDs and community intervention is increasingly acknowledged to enhance health behaviors within the community (26). Elevated self-efficacy is associated with a higher probability of participating and persisting in health-promoting practices.
lifestyle practices, encompassing physical exercise and nutritious diet (27). Therefore, it’s crucial to comprehend the significance of self-efficacy for healthcare practitioners to formulate specific interventions that bolster patients’ belief in their capability to handle NCDs.
Numerous tools exist to assess self-efficacy utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Quantitative tools for evaluating self-efficacy include the Self-Rated Abilities Scale for Health Practice (SRAHP) (9), Cancer Survivors’ Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES) (28), General Self-Efficacy Scale (29), and Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) (30). On the other hand, qualitative tools for measuring self-efficacy emphasize examining individuals’ views and interpretations of their self-efficacy beliefs through open-ended inquiries, interviews, or think-aloud methods (31, 32). Numerous investigations have concentrated on self-efficacy related to health-enhancing lifestyles among distinct study cohorts. Consequently, this review sets out to explore the influence of self-efficacy on health-promoting lifestyles in patients with NCDs and consolidate these insights in one article.
Methodology
This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (33). The research question was formulated utilizing the PEO framework (P: population; E: exposure; O: outcome), concentrating on the impact of self-efficacy in fostering a health-promoting lifestyle among individuals with NCDs. The population for this review is limited to those with NCDs. The intervention considered in this research pertains to the self-efficacy of the NCD patients, while the outcome is the health-promoting lifestyle of this cohort.
Searching method
The thorough article search concentrated on the influence of self-efficacy in health-promoting lifestyles for patients with NCDs. The quest for pertinent articles was performed across three indexed databases: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, from 25th to 28th October 2024. Boolean operators merged keywords and synonyms associated with the study population, intervention, and outcome. The terminology was tailored to meet the particular requirements of each database to assure thorough coverage. The search string was crafted as depicted in Table 1.
Inclusion and exclusion standards
Two authors (SM and DNA) independently identified the qualifying studies by examining the titles, abstracts, and complete texts of the articles. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: (i) Health-promoting lifestyle as the outcome; (ii) Articles published in English; (iii) Original research articles, and (iv) Articles released between 2015 and 2024. We restricted the publication dates to this range (articles published within the last 10 years) to ensure the review is grounded on up-to-date literature. Criteria for exclusion were: (i) Absence of self-efficacy exposure; (ii) The terms “self-efficacy” and “health-promoting lifestyle” were inadequately defined; and (iii) Studies focused on populations other than NCD patients.
Eligibility
The preliminary search yielded 308 citations, of which 173 records were discarded based on publication year, language, and article type using an automated tool. Following the removal of seven duplicate records, 128 unique records underwent title and abstract evaluation. During this screening phase, 120 articles were eliminated, resulting in a total of eight articles available for thorough appraisal. Figure 1 illustrates the article selection process in accordance with the PRISMA flow diagram.
Assessment of study quality
Three authors (SM, RS, and DNA) independently evaluated the quality of the selected articles using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. The assessment focused on the study design checklist (34, 35) and the results are compiled in Table 2.
Tool for data extraction
Two authors (SM, RS, and DNA) carried out data extraction by assessing the abstracts and full texts separately. The obtained data encompassed the author, publication year, country of study, type of NCD, self-efficacy tool, self-efficacy score, the significance of self-efficacy, health-promoting lifestyle framework by total or dimension and instrument used, and statistical methods applied.
Outcomes
Overview of the included studies
This review comprises eight studies (Table 2). The majority of the studies were conducted in Thailand (n=2) and Korea (n=2), with the remaining studies taking place in China, India, Indonesia, and Iran. All articles were released between 2018 and 2024. A total of eight studies included were cross-sectional in nature. The study population included patients diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, cardiac conditions, cardiovascular diseases, COPD, and cancer.
The influence of self-efficacy on health-promoting lifestyles among patients with NCD
Eight studies indicated a substantial positive correlation between self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyle. A strong association was noted in two studies from Thailand; i) among hospitalized patients with NCD during the COVID-19 second wave (36) and ii) elderly individuals with hypertension (9). Other studies indicated that older individuals with NCD residing in urban environments exhibited elevated levels of self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyles compared to those in rural settings (9, 37).
A moderate association was revealed by two investigations carried out in Korea involving thyroid cancer survivors (28) and hypertensive patients (23). Among thyroid cancer survivors, self-efficacy considerably impacts the health-promoting lifestyle during the acute cancer phase (28). A recent investigation performed in India with diabetic patients also indicated a moderate association between self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyle (21). A minimal positive correlation was observed by studies conducted in Iran and Indonesia focusing on breast cancer survivors (29) and elderly patients with hypertension (22), respectively. Another investigation focused on breast cancer survivors in China indicated a positive connection between self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyle (30).
Among all the studies included, solely three demonstrated that self-efficacy was positively correlated with facets of health-promoting lifestyle. Two of the studies were among breast cancer survivors (29, 30) while one focused on individuals with diabetes mellitus (21). The result analysis of this investigation concentrated solely on the physical activity and nutrition aspect of a health-promoting lifestyle as opposed to the construct in its entirety (21).
Instruments for Self-efficacy
A total of six types of questionnaires have been utilized to assess the self-efficacy variable: (i) SRAHP (9, 22, 30), (ii) Korean version of Cancer Survivors’ Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES-K) (28), (iii) General Self-Efficacy Scale (29), (iv) PSES (36), (v) Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) questionnaire (21), and (vi) Self-efficacy evaluation tool for patients with hypertension (23). Various self-efficacy scores have been exhibited among different study groups utilizing different self-efficacy measurement tools as illustrated in Table 2. A higher self-efficacy score signifies an elevated level of self-efficacy (9).
Discussion
Self-efficacy has a significant influence on health-promoting lifestyles among cancer survivors by affecting treatment factors and recovery processes. This comprises coping mechanisms, physical activity, and psychological resilience (25). When considering coping with treatment factors, high self-efficacy relates to improved coping mechanisms among cancer survivors (25). This enables cancer survivors to adopt a health-promoting lifestyle that alleviates anxiety regarding treatment repercussions and adheres more effectively to treatment regimens (25, 38).
Engaging in physical activity is a crucial health-promoting lifestyle aspect for both cancer survivors and patients dealing with diabetes and hypertension. It can mitigate treatment side effects and improve the quality of life for cancer survivors, as well as those with diabetes and hypertension. Regular physical endeavors such as brisk walking, cardiac rehabilitation, and cycling are essential for patients with non-communicable diseases (NCD). Self-efficacy is a potent predictor of physical activity adherence among NCD patients (39). Self-efficacy aids NCD patients in sustaining their levels of physical activity despite obstacles including fatigue and challenges related to cancer treatment (25).
Self-efficacy influences both the short- and long-term maintenance of a health-promoting lifestyle. Studies have shown that patients with NCD who maintain a high level of self-efficacy are more likely to adhere to prescribed medication schedules. This is vital for managing hypertension and diabetes. Individuals with significant self-efficacy tend to take a proactive approach to health-related responsibilities, such as consistently monitoring their blood glucose (40) and blood pressure (41). The nutritional aspect of a health-promoting lifestyle consists of a low-sodium and low-glucose diet, which is crucial for managing blood pressure and glucose levels, respectively. Those with high self-efficacy are more confident in implementing dietary changes and adhering to them (41).
Elevated levels of self-efficacy correlate with improved interpersonal relationships and spiritual development. The expansion of interpersonal connections enhances patients’ confidence in discussing their symptoms and treatment plans. This promotes productive dialogues regarding personalized approaches to pharmacotherapy, rehabilitation, and self-care (42). Crafting tailored treatment plans requires significant spiritual growth to initiate, practice, and sustain behavioral modifications. Such growth encourages patients to feel capable of managing their conditions, leading to participation in empowerment initiatives like cardiac rehabilitation and counseling clinics, ultimately resulting in enhanced disease control (14).
Self-efficacy levels can be augmented through patient empowerment programs, motivational interviewing strategies, support groups, and the involvement of family members in the management of NCD care. Research indicates that further emphasizing supportive familial settings can bolster self-efficacy among those with NCDs (43, 44). Support from family offers emotional, practical aid and enhances patients’ confidence regarding the management of their NCDs (40, 45). These strategies can be implemented in primary and secondary healthcare facilities by integrating family support into NCD management. Personalized management can be adapted to the specific patient to foster improved health-promoting lifestyles.
An additional tailor-made management strategy to elevate self-efficacy among patients
with NCD is facilitated through the motivational interviewing strategy. Motivational interviewing is a client-centered counseling method designed to bolster intrinsic motivation for transformation by investigating and addressing obstacles. This methodology honors the patient’s independence, empowering them to take charge of their behavioral modification journey. The technique aims to elicit the patient’s motivations for transformation instead of imposing outside motivations. This is essential for fostering self-efficacy, as individuals are more inclined to commit to changes they feel personally inspired to undertake.
Strengths and Limitations
All studies included were of cross-sectional nature, which led this systematic review to a significant risk of bias and a limitation in establishing causal relationships. The restriction to English-language publications confines the variety of article inclusion, possibly omitting high-quality articles published in other languages. Utilizing translation tools may increase the risk of instrument bias. However, the search strategy yielded literature sources from diverse countries where English is not the primary language (China, Korea, Iran, and Indonesia).
A key strength of this study is its eligibility criteria that exclusively include a precise definition of self-efficacy related to a health-promoting lifestyle. Furthermore, as far as we are aware, this represents the first systematic review synthesizing research evidence on the role of self-efficacy in health-promoting lifestyles among NCD patients. This systematic review emphasizes the importance of the self-efficacy approach in enhancing health-promoting lifestyles across various population groups.
Conclusion
In summary, self-efficacy serves as a crucial positive predictor of a health-promoting lifestyle, either as a concept or through its dimensions. Levels of self-efficacy can be enhanced through approaches aimed at individuals and communities. These strategies can be applied in primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare settings by customizing them to the specific population context to alleviate the global burden of NCDs.
Data Availability
All pertinent data are contained within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Supporting Information
S1 Table. Table 1. The PRISMA 2020 checklist.
S2 Table. Table 2. The PRISMA 2020 Abstract checklist.
S3 Table. Table 3. Studies identified in literature search.
S4 Table. Table 4. A detailed overview of studies included in the systematic literature review.
Fig.1. Figure 1. Process of study selection according to the PRISMA flowchart.
S1 Appendix. Conflict of Interests Statement and Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
The authors express gratitude to the Dean of Medical Faculty (FF 2024–129) and the Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for their support in conducting this review, as well as to the Director General of Health Malaysia for permitting the publication of this article.
This page was created programmatically; to access the article in its original location, you can follow the link below:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.05.25320027v1.full-text
and if you wish to remove this article from our site, please contact us.