Ben&Ben: Embracing human flaws is to insurgent towards AI

In a really perfect world, Ben&Ben’s Andrew de Pano mentioned that synthetic intelligence (AI) would stay a device. “Something to assist and support human creativity.” Or maybe, sooner or later, would “help me wash the dishes and clean the house,” he jokes.

But as it’s, AI has began to encroach on artistic areas, particularly in music. Programs like Suno and Udio can now churn out absolutely realized songs with mere prompts. And many of those tracks have already made their means onto streaming platforms—generally with out disclosing their actual origins. Even extra regarding, a few of these had been “recorded” (in the event you may even name it that) and launched underneath names of AI-generated acts.

Recently, the choice rock band Velvet Sundown made headlines after it was revealed that it was a product of AI—an artificial act with no human members, whose music, persona, and social media presence had been all made up. This got here after the group had already launched three albums and amassed tens of millions of streams. Needless to say, the revelation sparked discussions in regards to the moral implications of AI in music.

The line between AI assist and simulation is already skinny sufficient—and displacement could also be looming dangerously shut. For Ben&Ben, that is the place issues begin to get “iffy,” if not, downright “worrying.” The undeniable fact that AI techniques revenue off actual artists—normally by the use of coaching datasets constructed on human work—opens yet one more can of worms round copyright and monetization.

READ: In dropping her listening to, Lani Misalucha rediscovers her voice

Call for rules on AI

While he admits to not understanding the total spectrum of AI’s creation processes, lead vocalist and guitarist Paolo Guico is aware of nicely sufficient that the expertise depends upon analyzing the work of 1000’s of human artists. And there should be a means, he mentioned, to provide justice to the creators whose songs have grow to be fodder for AI.

“You can’t say the process is okay if it involves profiting off the work of other people,” Paolo Guico tells Lifestyle Inquirer in an interview—alongside fellow frontman-guitarist Miguel Guico and percussionist Andrew De Pano. “There has to be a balance: artists using AI responsibly and stricter policies when it comes to intellectual property.”

“It’s also about artists standing up for what’s right,” he provides.

In the Philippines, AI regulation remains to be in its infancy. While there are presently no particular legal guidelines addressing its use in music manufacturing, the federal government and numerous stakeholders have acknowledged AI’s rising affect on artistic sectors. The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines has even acknowledged that it could not grant copyright to works created totally by AI, and has not too long ago introduced plans to subject tips on the matter.

Meanwhile, House Bill No. 7396, or the Artificial Intelligence Development and Regulation Act, proposes the creation of a physique that will implement a complete nationwide AI technique—masking areas akin to analysis, cybersecurity, and moral oversight.

Elsewhere, platforms like YouTube have began to take motion. This July, the trade large mentioned it’s making ready to replace its insurance policies in order that repetitive, absolutely automated, and mass-produced movies—often known as “AI slop” —wouldn’t be eligible for monetization.

“It’s a great challenge not only in music, but for other institutions as well,” Miguel says.

Slippery slope

But greater than cash, authorship, or different moral issues, the rise of the AI trade raises pressing questions in regards to the very essence of music: creativity, emotion, authenticity—and their potential erosion.

For Miguel, folks should first possess foundational abilities for a given process or craft, earlier than turning to AI for help. But it’s a slippery slope. If AI may help streamline your work in seconds, then what’s stopping you from asking it to do the whole give you the results you want?

He cites the reliance on the generative AI chatbot ChatGPT for essay writing for example his level: “We should know how to write essays ourselves before turning to AI, because we risk forgetting those skills. It’s the same with music-making. AI can expand on ideas you can think of, but it’s dangerous to become overly reliant on it.”

“Otherwise, there will be regression,” he stresses, “because AI replaces your thinking process.”

If younger aspiring musicians see songs being created in seconds by these with no actual ardour or dedication to the craft—and nonetheless in a position to make a dwelling out of it—it may be disheartening. Unfortunately, it is a sentiment De Pano has been listening to an increasing number of.

“There are new artists now wondering what’s the point of it all? What’s the point of learning and nurturing the hobbies they love when hard work is just a prompt away,” he laments.

“What I worry about, and what I wish I could tell those new artists, is not to get discouraged. Keep creating because there’s definitely space for you—your creativity and your unique perspective—in whatever branch or field you choose to pursue,” De Pano provides.

READ: Your favourite Okay-drama OSTs, delivered to life at KOSTCON 2025

What AI can’t replicate

But the truth is, AI is right here to remain, and there’s no stopping it at this level. People should study to coexist with it. And as a substitute of attempting to compete with AI or match its pace and technical precision, maybe the higher step is to acknowledge the failings that make us—and our music—in the end human.

After all, stacking towards a system programmed for perfection and embracing our imperfections is to insurgent towards AI.

“We can do something,” Miguel declares. “We can rebel against it. And what I mean by that is for artists to challenge themselves—to find out what’s wrong or imperfect in what you do. AI is trained to find the perfect solution to everything. But human behaviors are not perfect. We’re not perfect.”

It may be within the little cracks within the voice, a phrase misplaced within the lyrics, or a strum that misses the beat. After all, it’s the feelings, the vacillating psychological state, or just being current within the second that set off these imperfections within the first place.

It can even boil right down to physiology. You sound the way you sound as a result of that’s who you might be, and also you write what you write as a result of that’s what makes you who you might be.

“Your vocal tone might have a bit of sibilance that some people find harsh to the ears, but that’s what makes you different,” Miguel says. “I know it might sound vague…and sure, AI might one day be trained to replicate imperfection. But still, imperfection is something we can own.”

And if there’s one factor AI can’t replicate, Paolo says, it’s the experiences that form their music and the real-world connection they’re in a position to construct due to it. “We also focus on making memories with our fans, with everyone. That takes time and commitment…[and] presence.”

For a band that made a reputation for itself for its storytelling and natural folk-pop sensibilities, asking its members whether or not they use AI or if it has a spot of their artistic course of nearly looks like an insult to their artistry and values. Not to dismiss those that do, however the thought De Pano says, is “simply something unthinkable.”

“I don’t think we’ll be happy [with] taking out the human heart aspect out from the things we do, okay. For us, that’s never going to fly. As long as we’re alive, we’re here. And we will work as we’ve always done.”

Besides, what good is having 9 members if they will’t create and suppose for themselves? “Siyam na nga kami,” De Pano says, laughing. “Nakakahiya if we still involve an AI!”