California releases new local weather change plan after Trump assaults

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://calmatters.org/environment/climate-change/2025/08/trump-climate-counter/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us


By Alejandro Lazo and Alejandra Reyes-Velarde, CalMatters

"A
Hydrogen-powered vans at IMC headquarters in Compton on Oct. 29, 2024. Photo by Carlin Stiehl for CalMatters

This story was initially revealed by CalMatters. Sign up for his or her newsletters.

California regulators, responding to the Trump Administration’s assaults on the state’s local weather coverage, suggest to struggle again partly by asking lawmakers to backfill electrical car incentives, recommending extra personal funding, and starting to put in writing clear automobile guidelines — once more. 

“Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,” stated Air Resources Board chairperson Liane Randolph. “California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health. We have a legal and moral obligation.”

Several state businesses jointly made the recommendations in response to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s June executive order calling for California to double down on efforts to transition away from fossil fuels. 

Proposals unveiled Tuesday additionally embody changing expiring federal EV tax credit — a tricky ask in a decent funds 12 months—and restoring carpool lane entry, which might require federal approval. One advice seeks to increase car charging entry by streamlining utility hookups and simplifying permits for brand new stations. 

The air board is advancing only a few regulatory concepts: one to enact stronger client protections for clear automobile homeowners, and one other to curb diesel air pollution from freight hubs resembling ports and warehouses. Randolph additionally stated the board would start work on a brand new clear automobiles rule.

A spokesman for the governor stated he would overview the businesses’ report. 

The suggestions replicate the exhausting shift the state has skilled from a supportive Biden administration towards a hostile one below President Trump, stated Guillermo Ortiz, senior clear automobiles advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“When you have your federal government using every tool at its disposal to attack its own state …how are you able to see every attack angle, every vector, everything that this administration is willing to do to harm California?” he stated. “That’s difficult.” 

Other specialists additionally stated they anticipated extra. “Folks familiar with this kind of policy will read it and feel…underwhelmed,” wrote Earthjustice lawyer Adrian Martinez in an evaluation of the plan.

“Nothing jumps out at me as being particularly aggressive,” stated Daniel Sperling, a former Air Resources Board member who’s the director of the Institute for Transportation Studies at UC Davis. “I’m puzzled, actually, because they had acted like they were really going to do something significant.”

Trucking deal collapses

California supplied the cures as a fallback after the Trump Administration introduced it could cancel federal waivers issued below the Clean Air Act which have lengthy allowed the state to set extra aggressive automobile and truck requirements.

Attacks on the state’s local weather insurance policies escalated final week, centered on the Clean Truck Partnership, a voluntary deal between main truck producers and the state that will proceed advancing zero emission truck expertise even when the waiver packages fell via.

Last week, 4 producers filed a lawsuit, in search of to dissolve their commitments below the partnership. The Federal Trade Commission, after launching an investigation into California’s program, declared the partnership unenforceable

Days later, Trump’s Justice Department intervened in two lawsuits, arguing that the choice whether or not to ban internal-combustion engines in heavy-duty vans rests finally with the federal authorities.

California’s local weather insurance policies matter most in communities close to ports, warehouses and railyards, the place diesel air pollution chokes the air, stated Ortiz of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Truck exhaust is a serious supply of most cancers threat and drives respiratory and coronary heart illness. 

Without authority to make aggressive guidelines or robust voluntary measures just like the Clean Truck Partnership, specialists say the transition to less-polluting vans may decelerate.

A name for bolder motion 

Experts who known as for bolder motion stated the state has extra energy than its govt and legislative branches are utilizing. 

Sperling stated the state may higher disincentivize gas-powered automobiles with a “feebate program,” which may cost charges on high-polluting automobiles so as to pay for clean-car rebates. 

“If you really want to put your money where your mouth is, I think really supercharging those programs to advance transportation electrification could be a massively successful strategy,” stated Martinez, who directs Earthjustice’s marketing campaign towards that objective. 

Martinez stated that the state may higher construction present state packages together with the Low Carbon Fuel Standard and the state’s Cap and Trade program to pay for electrical automobiles and vans.

“California shouldn’t blink” because the Trump Administration strikes “aggressively,” he added.

Ethan Elkind, who directs the local weather program at UC Berkeley’s Center for Law, Energy and the Environment, stated a statewide rule tightening controls at warehouses and different air pollution magnets may obtain comparable goals to the truck mandates. 

Elkind beforehand has pushed to go additional. If the federal authorities is getting out of the enterprise of regulating tailpipe emissions and making local weather coverage, he added, California may fill that vacuum sooner or later. 

“The state could take a pretty aggressive approach here,” he added.

Air Resources Board chair Randolph stated that California shouldn’t be backing down, although she admitted that growing a brand new clear automobile rule geared toward phasing out gas-powered automobiles may take time. 

“Because these rulemakings take two, three, sometimes even four years, we decided that it would be good to start that process now, and have it … be ready, ideally for a more receptive U.S. EPA,” Randolph stated.

This article was initially revealed on CalMatters and was republished below the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://calmatters.org/environment/climate-change/2025/08/trump-climate-counter/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *