Why who will get to the Moon first is necessary

The race to return people to the Moon is not only about planting a flag. At stake is one thing much less seen however much more consequential: who units the foundations, builds the infrastructure, and defines the working playbook for the subsequent period of house exploration. And the reply might ripple far past the Moon, shaping how – and the way quickly – people attain Mars. 

The treaty baseline and the actual contest 

The authorized basis is obvious. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any nation from claiming the Moon as sovereign territory. No one can personal it by “claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.” 

But what the treaty doesn’t forbid is being the primary to function in key areas – and that issues. 

The first actors on the bottom have the ability to form the norms, the habits, and the infrastructure that everybody else would encounter. Ownership could also be off the desk, however procedures typically harden into precedent. That is the actual contest. 

Advertisement – scroll for extra content material

Competing playbooks: Norms and rule-setting 

Two distinct approaches to lunar governance are already taking form.

On one facet are the Artemis Accords – US-led ideas for accountable exercise on the Moon and past. As of July 2025, 56 international locations have signed on, committing to transparency, deconfliction, and cooperative use of assets.

On the opposite facet stands the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), spearheaded by China with Russia as a associate. As of April 2025, 17 international locations and organizations had signed onto this imaginative and prescient, which imagines an built-in lunar base within the 2030s. 

If China lands astronauts first, the ILRS narrative positive aspects momentum. Precedent is highly effective: the group that arrives first at precedence websites can set its practices because the de facto normal.

Infrastructure and requirements: Building the ‘roads and ports’ 

Standards are usually not nearly diplomacy – they’re about {hardware}. NASA is creating LunaNet, an open, interoperable lunar communications and navigation framework. If American programs are established first, LunaNet turns into the default.

But China has its personal imaginative and prescient. The launch of Queqiao-2 in 2024 supplied relay companies for far-side operations, and a concept for a 30+ satellite tv for pc lunar communications and navigation constellation might set up an alternate system by the 2030s and 2040s. 

Whoever seeds these networks first positive aspects affect over interfaces, spectrum allocations, and logistics economics. In impact, they construct the “roads and ports” others should journey.

Scarce actual property: The south pole benefit 

The lunar south pole is the prize. Permanently shadowed areas there comprise water ice, which was confirmed by NASA’s LCROSS mission in 2009 and subsequent orbital knowledge from different spacecraft such because the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and India’s Chandrayaan-1 satellite tv for pc. Ice could be transformed into ingesting water, breathable oxygen, and even rocket gasoline. 

But the terrain is proscribed. Only a handful of “peaks of near-eternal light” present steady solar energy close to the possibly ice-rich craters. NASA coverage papers and tutorial analysis each anticipate congestion and potential conflicts as a number of nations converge on the identical small ridges. 

Being first issues as a result of it permits operators to determine protected practices in these high-value areas and invite others to work round them.

Science and the far facet’s ‘Radio Quiet Zone’

Beyond assets lies science. The Moon’s far facet is uniquely shielded from Earth’s radio noise, making it a goldmine for low-frequency astronomy. 

International our bodies have burdened the necessity to shield this pure asset. But safety is dependent upon who operates there first, and whether or not they deal with the far facet as a scientific sanctuary or an industrial hub. 

Security and house area consciousness

Military worth on the Moon could also be restricted within the close to time period, however situational consciousness is one other story. Tracking objects in cislunar house is strategically important. The U.S. is field-testing Oracle, a system to catalog site visitors and hazards out to lunar distances. 

First movers have the chance to determine site visitors administration practices, like requiring lighting, transponders, and reporting to cut back dangers and form how cislunar house is ruled.

Economy and business: Momentum issues 

NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program is already shopping for robotic deliveries from non-public corporations. Intuitive Machines returned the U.S. to the lunar floor in February 2024, with extra missions in line. A crewed Artemis touchdown would cement American distributors within the lunar economic system. 

At the identical time, U.S. coverage helps non-public rights to extracted house assets, whereas avoiding sovereignty claims. Early, seen operations would assist make that framework the lived actuality on the bottom. 

Prestige, alliances, and symbolism 

Symbolism issues, too. Congress has explicitly linked getting Americans again to the Moon earlier than China to U.S. world management and to conserving Artemis companions aligned. 

A Chinese first touchdown, in contrast, might energize ILRS recruitment and increase Beijing’s status, even with out altering the authorized image.

What If China lands first? 

If China achieves a crewed touchdown earlier than the U.S. returns, the probably outcomes are: 

• Narrative and recruiting. Beijing would strengthen ILRS credibility and certain appeal to extra companions. 
• Standards and networks. Chinese infrastructure like Queqiao-2 might develop into the default for ILRS members, complicating future interoperability.
• Site congestion. Occupying the few power-rich ridges close to ice might complicate later planning and require extra deconfliction. 

What it could not do is confer authorized sovereignty. The Outer Space Treaty nonetheless applies. But the sensible benefit lies in being the one who writes the primary chapters of the working guide. 

Where the U.S. program stands 

NASA’s timeline stays tight. 

• Artemis 2, this system’s first crewed lunar flyby, is ready for “no later than April 2026.” 
• Artemis 3, this system’s first crewed touchdown, is scheduled for “no earlier than mid-2027,” with technical challenges with Orion’s warmth protect and SpaceX’s Human Landing System nonetheless ongoing. 

Delays make the race with China’s personal 2030 human touchdown goal extra unsure. Every slip raises the chance that Beijing will get there first. 

The backside line 

Returning first to the Moon doesn’t imply possession. What it means is affect: over norms, requirements, site visitors administration, and who gathers at which hubs. The tangible stakes embrace: 

• Control of communications and navigation requirements. 
• Early presence on scarce south pole actual property. 
• Reputation and alliances. 
• Momentum to maintain America’s industrial and scientific management.

If China lands first, the U.S. is just not locked out, however it could be reacting to another person’s framework in essentially the most invaluable neighborhoods.

Does racing China to the Moon have an effect on the race to Mars? 

Indirectly, sure. The Moon is the testbed for Mars. If China establishes south pole websites and seeds its personal infrastructure, U.S. companions might face fragmented programs, slowing the cooperative logistics a Mars program calls for.

By distinction, a U.S.-led Artemis foothold means LunaNet requirements, interoperable docking and refueling, and shared energy grids. This creates a cislunar “grid,” a staging space near Earth that may feed Mars missions at scale. 

Whoever defines the playbook on the Moon would seemingly affect the framework Mars inherits. 

What to look at: Is ‘Moon first’ serving to Mars? 

Key milestones that present progress towards Mars embrace: 

• Large-scale orbital refueling demonstrations tied to Artemis landers. 
• Gateway habitation intervals that yield actual radiation and life-support knowledge. 
• Fission floor energy contracts shifting towards lunar demonstration {hardware}. 
• Revived polar useful resource campaigns to map and mine water ice. 
• Annual Moon-to-Mars structure updates that hyperlink every Artemis milestone to a particular Mars threat retirement.

One line that sums it up 

The Moon, although solely a three-day journey, holds selections that may seemingly affect voyages lasting years. Establishing norms and infrastructure there isn’t merely about returning to the lunar floor; it’s about pioneering the trail to Mars.