This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://petapixel.com/2026/03/26/every-camera-brand-agrees-generative-ai-doesnt-belong-in-photography/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
![]()
By and huge, huge tech executives love AI. There is a few reporting that executives now say “AI” more than they say “earnings,” so the love affair is actual. Thankfully, digital camera manufacturers see the identical line within the sand: not one in all them thinks generative AI belongs in a digital camera.
During CP+ final month, I had the chance to take a seat with executives from each main digital camera model and chat a couple of broad vary of subjects. Questions usually range from firm to firm, however this yr I requested each one in all them the identical factor: “Do you think generative AI should be added to a camera?”
I admit, this query was pushed by a worry that one in all them — and I wasn’t positive which — was going to try to cram AI right into a digital camera physique. Seeing what Caira did (though it pulled again in response to suggestions) had me nervous, and I feared that, given how a lot Western CEOs cherished AI, somebody in Japan was going to assume this was a good suggestion. Luckily, at the very least for now, none of them thinks so.

This may be the primary time that Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, OM System, Panasonic, and Sigma all agree on the identical matter.
“Photography is not just about the result of the picture, but I think the joy of the process,” Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki tells me.
“So if we were just interested in the result, then AI-generated images can replace photos. But we enjoy using cameras, and we enjoy the process from RAW to JPEG. All this process makes the final result more precious. So I don’t believe photography can be replaced by AI-generated images, and I’m quite positive about the future of photography.”
‘We have to prevent the case where Generative AI starts to make fake images.’
“Nikon’s stance is straightforward: We will always back the human element of creativity as well as the photographers, filmmakers, and artists who bring it to life,” Fumiko Kawabata, Sr. Vice President of Marketing and Planning, at Nikon Inc., says.
“We need to collectively acknowledge the risks generative AI poses to both the concept and the spirit of originality, but also never forget that the passion for the process also brings us together. Now is the time for us to be supporting our creator communities, and also exploring emerging tools such as content authenticity.”

“Generative AI technology has pros and cons. We would like to develop some AI technology to deliver new value for the benefit of the customer. For example, noise reduction, image composition such as Live GND, or other functions like that can help expand the expression of the photographer,” Kazuhiro Togashi, SVP, Global Brand and Marketing Strategy at OM System, says.
“But, basically, we think the real experience of taking a photo is important. It’s a real photo.”

“We have to prevent the case where Generative AI starts to make fake images,” Go Tokura, Executive Vice President, Head of Imaging Group at Canon, says. “Photo authenticity is very important. Something that proves a photo was taken by our camera or disclosed that it was created by generative AI. ”
“I think what’s most important is to be able to distinguish clearly between whether it’s generative or not,” Yuji Igarashi, General Manager, Professional Imaging Group, Imaging Solutions Division at Fujifilm, says.
“I think at least as of now, we believe AI is something to assist taking pictures like autofocus, or detection, et cetera, rather than generating something in the camera. Any edits made with AI should probably be tracked better than what is being done now, so that when you have the file, you know what has happened to get to this at the end. So that’s our belief now.”
‘Photography is not just about the result of the picture, but I think the joy of the process.’
Fujifilm’s stance is fairly much like these of its contemporaries. While cramming generative AI into cameras, much like how some smartphone producers have been so desirous to implement, doesn’t sound correct to those exectutives, additionally they acknowledge the advantages that the expertise can have elsewhere. Sony, for instance, has been utilizing AI for years to enhance its autofocus.
“When it comes to using AI, I see two main aspects. The first is camera usage: we actively use AI technologies such as human pose estimation and subject recognition. We fully embrace these technologies. At the same time, we want to protect and support creators and their rights,” Yasufumi Machitani, General Manager, Camera Business Department, Imaging Entertainment Business Unit at Sony, says.
“So, that’s why we offer Camera Authenticity Solution as a member of the C2PA steering committee, to support journalists and creators through more advanced verification of the authenticity of both still images and video content.”
Canon acknowledges that Generative AI may also assist its staff’s effectivity.
“Generative AI may be helpful for enhancing the effectiveness and also the accuracy in the operation or operability of the shooting processes. There is one more possibility for internal costs as well. I mean, if AI becomes so useful for our development teams, for example, that could help us to reduce the cost, and then we can provide more value to the customers as a result.”
Panasonic says that it makes use of AI to enhance topic detection accuracy or to permit a photographer or filmmaker to higher specific a picture, however making one thing from nothing utilizing AI will not be the purpose.
‘Any edits made with AI should probably be tracked better than what is being done now.’
“Especially for video production, we feel that the subject needs to be real in that case. We focus on the professional live streaming systems, video logging, and daily use of the consumer camera. ‘Daily use’ does not mean generative AI,” Toshiyuki Tsumura, Executive Vice President and Director of Panasonic’s Imaging Business, says.
Every government made it clear that whereas AI is massively useful for a lot of elements of pictures, generative AI takes away from the inventive course of that each firm strongly helps. When I made it clear that the subject at hand wasn’t bettering autofocus, including in-camera computational options, and even bettering decision with upscaling expertise, however relatively what was being seen in common smartphone manufacturers that base their total launches round creating fictional pictures and movies, the executives all nodded their heads in settlement: that isn’t pictures.
“We have the same opinion about it,” OM System’s Togashi affirmed.
Image credit: Header photograph licensed through Depositphotos.com.
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://petapixel.com/2026/03/26/every-camera-brand-agrees-generative-ai-doesnt-belong-in-photography/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us

