This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-astronomers-photograph-ufos-orbiting-earth-in-the-1950s/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
For generations, UFO fans have longed for claims of aliens visiting Earth to be significantly investigated by scientists. Now they’re getting their want. This month outstanding peer-reviewed journals have revealed two papers that hyperlink obvious flashes of sunshine seen by a telescope 70 years in the past to potential synthetic objects in house. But there are lots of easier explanations, offering a chance for UFO fans to see how extraordinary claims are examined—and infrequently undone—by unusual science.
“I think there are many in the UFO community who really want to know what’s going on,” says Adam Frank, an astrophysicist on the University of Rochester, who has written frequently concerning the prospects of alien life. “I think it is worthwhile for us to have these open, transparent investigations. This is a great way to show people how science works.”
Beatriz Villarroel, an astronomer and theoretical physicist on the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics in Sweden, is the driving drive behind each papers. The first was revealed within the Nature journal Scientific Reports on October 20, after a six-month peer evaluation course of, and the second was revealed within the Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific on October 17, after a shorter evaluation course of. Both concern knowledge gathered on the Palomar Observatory in California from 1949 to 1958 for a challenge known as the Palomar Sky Survey, which was one of many first detailed astronomical surveys of the sky.
On supporting science journalism
If you are having fun with this text, contemplate supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.
About 2,000 photographic plates have been used as a part of the survey. Each was a glass sheet coated in an emulsion, or a layer of chemical substances, that reacted to incoming gentle, largely from stars throughout the sky. This was the primary technique of recording astronomical photos earlier than the appearance of digital cameras. Each photographic plate was the scale of a vinyl file cowl and was bodily lifted into and faraway from the telescope that carried out the survey, the 1.2-meter Palomar Schmidt telescope, later renamed the Samuel Oschin Telescope. The plates were digitized within the Nineteen Nineties and 2000s.
Villarroel and her workforce used the digitized scans to check the evening sky because it was earlier than the 1957 launch of the primary synthetic satellite tv for pc, the Soviet Union’s Sputnik 1, to eradicate the potential for seeing space-based interference from human exercise. They used picture processing software program to search for transients—short-lived celestial occasions, resembling stars flaring in brightness or fading from view, which are typically related to excessive astrophysics. Under the auspices of Villarroel’s Vanishing & Appearing Sources throughout a Century of Observations (VASCO) challenge, they recognized greater than 107,000 transients.
In precept, in addition to fluctuating stars transients may be related to different issues, too, resembling excessive house climate occasions impinging on the higher environment, daylight glinting off reflective objects close to Earth, in addition to flaws within the telescope or the imaging course of. Among the occasions that the researchers recognized, they famous a number of examples the place a number of transients appeared aligned in a straight line throughout a single photographic plate, a configuration that Villarroel argues is unlikely to happen by any identified pure phenomenon. (Other consultants, resembling Princeton University astrophysicist Robert Lupton, say that discovering a number of such patterns in 1000’s of star-spangled plates may simply be mere coincidence.)
In the Scientific Reports paper, Villarroel and Stephen Bruehl, a Vanderbilt University Medical Center anesthesiologist with an curiosity in UFOs, discovered that lots of the transients occurred on or close to dates of nuclear testing, with multiple nuclear test sites identified to be close to the Palomar Observatory on the time. They wrote that transients seemed to be 45 p.c extra possible on dates inside 24 hours of a nuclear take a look at. “On days when there was no nuclear test, you saw transients on 11 percent of those days,” says Bruehl, the paper’s lead writer. “On the day after a nuclear test, you saw transients on almost 19 percent of those days.” From the two,718 days of observations made by the Palomar Sky Survey, Villarroel’s workforce recognized transients occurring on 310 days, with probably the most being 4,528 transients in in the future.
In their paper, Bruehl and Villarroel linked these transients to world studies of UFO sightings and located a small affiliation, with transients being recognized on the identical day as a UFO, or UAP (unidentified anomalous phenomenon), sighting. They claimed an 8.5 p.c enhance within the variety of transients recognized on days with UAP studies and urged this may imply the 2 have been linked, referencing “a well-known strand of UAP lore suggesting that nuclear weapons may attract UAP” to look at the occasions.

A candidate transient is highlighted (blue circles) on this determine from an related paper by Beatriz Villarroel and colleagues. Derived from digital scans of photographic plates from the Palomar Sky Survey and color-inverted to emphasise element, these photos present what the authors say could possibly be flashes of sunshine from synthetic objects in outer house, years earlier than people despatched spacecraft into Earth orbit.
Villarroel et al 2025 PASP 137 104504, CC BY 4.0
The hyperlink to nuclear weapons may be easier, says Michael Wiescher, a nuclear astrophysicist on the University of Notre Dame in France. “Nuclear tests obviously have an impact on the atmosphere,” he says. For instance, the primary telecommunications satellite tv for pc, NASA’s Telstar 1, was knocked out by an electromagnetic pulse from the American high-altitude nuclear take a look at Starfish Prime in November 1962. Nuclear exams also can depart “a lot of junk in the outer atmosphere,” Wiescher says, resembling bits of metallic and radioactive mud, that would seem briefly as starlike bursts of radiance to a telescope.
In their Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific paper, Villarroel and her workforce urged that the variety of transients dropped by about 30 p.c in areas of the overhead sky that will have fallen inside Earth’s umbral shadow, instantly according to the solar. This sample could possibly be defined if the transients have been brought on by sunlight-reflecting objects that have been orbiting Earth, they wrote. “It looks like we are dealing with something that looks pretty artificial in a time when there shouldn’t be anything there,” Villarroel says.
Each photographic plate took a 50-minute publicity of the sky, main Villarroel to counsel that these putative objects have been stationary in house, presumably in geostationary orbit some 22,000 miles (35,000 kilometers) above Earth. Bright objects in decrease orbits—or different much less sensational prospects resembling meteors—would have left a streak as an alternative of a starlike dot of sunshine, she says.
Frank says that the 2 papers are an opportunity for scientists to have one thing tangible to scrutinize relating to UFOs. Often, he says, proof has been little greater than “fuzzy blob photos” or rumour. “What’s interesting about these two papers is: they played by the rules by which science can evaluate evidence,” he provides, referencing Carl Sagan’s well-known adage that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
Whether there’s “extraordinary evidence” right here is up for some debate. The papers weren’t accepted by arXiv.org, a web based preprint server the place nonpaywalled scientific papers are sometimes uploaded, with the web site noting to Villarroel that the Scientific Reports paper specifically “does not contain sufficient or substantive scholarly research.”
There are additionally a bunch of easier explanations for Villaroel’s transients—which have drawn previous scrutiny from skeptical astronomers—that don’t require the extraordinary declare of UFOs. Sean Kirkpatrick, who was head of the Pentagon’s UFO-investigating All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) from July 2022 to December 2023, says he thinks the hyperlink to nuclear testing and Earth’s shadow is vital. “Taken together, that tells me that these transients have both a solar and nuclear overlap,” he says. “The first thing that comes to mind is solar flare radiation or ionized particle radiation from nuclear testing,” split-second bursts of sunshine within the higher environment that will manifest as some extent supply quite than a streak. Another potential rationalization is high-altitude balloons, which have been used to do nuclear monitoring. “You’re going to have a lot of those around nuclear testing, and so if people see them, a lot of people are going to report them,” he says.
Kirkpatrick says Villarroel and her workforce may use at this time’s geostationary satellites to see if they might reproduce the transients seen by Palomar, constructing a duplicate photographic plate and figuring out if it produces related transients from identified orbiting objects. “What they have not done is prove this technique works on today’s geostationary objects,” he says. If it does, that would open the avenue to different non-UAP explanations to discover, resembling items of sunlight-catching ice or rock lingering in trapped orbits far above Earth. “There are things that get captured up there and just kind of float around,” Kirkpatrick says.
There are astronomical explanations, too, Lupton says, as a result of “things go bang and vary all over the place.” He factors to the instance of gamma-ray bursts, extraordinarily vivid cosmic explosions that have been discovered serendipitously by nuclear-monitoring satellites within the Nineteen Sixties. “We were trying to see if the Russians were [secretly] blowing up nuclear weapons, and it turned out to be stars destroying themselves on the other side of the universe,” he says. The Vera C. Rubin Telescope in Chile is anticipated to seek out tens of millions of transients from supernovae—exploding stars—alone, amongst many different varieties of transients, when it begins a 10-year survey of the sky later this yr.
The most prosaic rationalization is that Villarroel’s transients are merely artifacts within the photographic plates resembling speckles of mud, blobs within the emulsion and even radioactive particles. Nigel Hambly, an astronomer on the University of Edinburgh, who has beforehand analyzed Villarroel’s work and who has intensive expertise with photographic plates from Palomar and different observatories, says one strategy to examine can be to check the unique plates themselves quite than utilizing digital copies. “I’ve been caught out many times by apparently real things turning up in my data,” he says, particularly when working with plates that weren’t saved in pristine situations. “When you actually physically examine the plates under a microscope, you begin to get a feeling for what’s real and what’s spurious,” he says. “There’s no shame in being wrong.”
Eliot Gillum, director of optical SETI (seek for extraterrestrial intelligence) on the SETI Institute in California, says that regardless of the transients actually are, it will likely be attention-grabbing to use the scientific course of to them. “It’s wonderful to take a set of phenomena we don’t understand and study them,” he says. He provides that Villarroel and her workforce may take a look at their similar methodology on different photographic plate archives to see if the transients present up elsewhere. “There are plenty of other sets of digitized plates,” Gillum says. “It’s quite possible that there are multiple causes here. It would be great to figure them out.” He says that one other risk could possibly be meteors that flew straight down into the telescope’s view quite than throughout it; that will make the objects seem as dots of sunshine as an alternative of streaks.
Villarroel says that she welcomes different concepts for what these transients is perhaps. “Even if this turns out to be some new physical phenomenon, that’s super exciting,” she says. “That would mean we have discovered something new that nobody knew existed.” If that does grow to be the case, there are many different searches for extraterrestrials—resembling NASA’s upcoming Habitable Worlds Observatory—that may whet the urge for food of these eager for indicators of life elsewhere within the cosmos.
“It’s one of the most important scientific questions that we have,” Frank says. “The great thing is: we now finally have the capacity to start answering this.”
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-astronomers-photograph-ufos-orbiting-earth-in-the-1950s/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
