Navigating the Fine Line: How Much Travel Disruption is Too Much?

Subscribe to Simon Calder’s free travel newsletter for expert guidance and money-saving deals

Receive Simon Calder’s Travel newsletter

Receive Simon Calder’s Travel newsletter

Experiencing a flight cancellation is nearly always distressing. For it to occur merely three days prior to Christmas is particularly dreadful. Passengers are heavily invested in their travel plans, and having them disrupted at the last minute—with minimal alternatives left for traveling before December 25—can incur a significantly heavy emotional toll.

As I pen this on Saturday evening in Vienna, I am grateful that my flight to London scheduled for Sunday is set to arrive at Stansted, not Heathrow. There is a strong probability I will arrive approximately on time. Nevertheless, the British Airways flight expected at 11am from the Austrian capital to Heathrow, is among the 80 flights that BA has cancelled on Sunday.

Additional airlines have also cut back their schedules, with Virgin Atlantic canceling a round-trip to Miami. Lufthansa from Germany has annulled two arrivals and departures from Frankfurt. Swiss, TAP Portugal, Eurowings, SAS, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, and Turkish Airlines have similarly suspended flights.

The reason: with strong winds anticipated, air traffic controllers have decreased the rate at which aircraft can take off and land.

Heathrow is the world’s busiest two-runway airport, with landings spaced as little as 80 seconds apart. In times of strong winds, the incoming flight rate is slowed down, inevitably resulting in cancellations.

These are preferably made in advance rather than on the day itself. Airlines with frequent flights at Heathrow are required to adjust their schedules; carriers with only a single departure, such as Avianca’s nightly flight to Bogota, are largely unaffected.

Among the cancellations by British Airways are six flights to and from Amsterdam and Glasgow, in addition to connections with Madrid, Nice, and Barcelona.

Common to all these destinations is a high frequency to and from Heathrow. Here in Vienna, for instance, British Airways has four other Sunday departures. If your final stop is Heathrow, you will likely be accommodated on one of these; if, similar to many travelers, you are connecting, alternate routes may be available, although seats are limited so close to Christmas.

One traveler booked on a different airline informed me: “They first automatically rebooked me on a flight for Monday. I thought, no way. And I got on the phone. “It took several hours – and a breakdown – before anyone picked up, and even then it was quite a struggle. They are now routing us indirectly.”

There will be numerous stories like this: I estimate that at least 15,000 passengers have experienced flight cancellations at Heathrow. This begs the question: is this acceptable? The UK governments have mainly enabled airlines to make their own commercial choices, subject to air passenger rights regulations. However, when relatively typical winter conditions lead to widespread cancellations at the country’s primary airport, should airlines be required to cut back their schedules? After thousands of flights at Heathrow faced cancellations due to heavy snowfall in the lead-up to Christmas 2010, the CEO of Gatwick suggested that part of the winter schedule should be shifted from Heathrow to his airport. That proposal never materialized.

Airlines and airports provide tremendous value for British travelers, and any limitations on their options are, in my perspective, likely to harm the consumer. The crucial matter? Enforcement of air passenger rights. The canceled traveler told me that direct seats on another airline were available online, but her airline claimed they could not be booked. That contradicts the established rules. Airlines that do not adhere to fair practices should be cautious of unfavorable repercussions.