This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.thephoblographer.com/2025/08/12/an-open-letter-to-the-art-photography-community-from-the-only-publisher-who-consistently-cared/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
If you’ve been studying us for years, you’ll know one factor: we went out of our option to function information and interviews with photographers and their galleries moreso than some other images publication. And in January of this yr, one thing occurred that made us say that we’re taking a break from the artwork world. So this yr, I’ve given path to the employees to focus as a substitute on simply tech, combatting generative AI concerned in picture making, and extra investigative tales. Additionally, we’ve leaned into the truth that we’ve examined probably the most cameras and lenses of any photo-speciality publication — so we do numerous roundups. Who would’ve thought that it might be working for us?
I’ve at all times been an individual to lean into unfiltered honesty; and I’m going to take action proper now.
Last yr, there have been a number of photographers who have been insanely troublesome to work with. What which means is that :
- There have been sufficient who have been late getting again to us — which throws off our publishing schedule.
- They have been sufficient that, at instances, insanely impolite to a publication that desires to function them in a pleasant method, and even preserve linking again to them.
- The galleries and museums weren’t receiving protection from some other publication, and but refused to work with us on a extra sustainable enterprise relationship/
- It wasn’t bringing in sufficient site visitors as a result of photographers are in the end egocentric and don’t care about when different colleagues of their make it into publications.
- The common public is brainwashed into pondering that images isn’t artwork.
- The producers have made it in order that images is extremely easy with the press of a button — due to this fact making the barrier to entry fairly low. To that finish, individuals assume that images isn’t artwork as a result of anybody can do it. Yet they don’t perceive flash or different particular in-camera strategies.
- Photographers themselves are creating low-quality work as a consequence of social media algorithms, which reward the thought of getting on a development as a substitute of honest creativity and originality.
But the massive one which broke the final straw for me is that this: for a time that’s greater than I can keep in mind with out trying again in my e-mail historical past, a photographer’s consultant mentioned that we can not publish photos first as a result of the New York Times apparently purchased unique rights to with the ability to launch the story first. This not solely hurts publications like ours which might be usually quick sufficient to launch a narrative forward of the Times, but it surely’s additionally in opposition to journalistic ethics. I can’t show that the New York Times did this, however I can reference that many have informed us that they Times did it.
Speaking from a spot of sincere intelligence, I’m sick of it. I’m sick of attempting to persuade photographers that they have to be making authentic art work in order that generative AI doesn’t copy what they do. And the best way that we have been doing that’s by highlighting and championing the photographers who did so.
Our web site has at all times been one to place girls, POCs, and LGBTQAI+ photographers to the entrance along with that includes distinctive images once we noticed it.
But as a lot as we’ve been a defend for that neighborhood, I’ve actually by no means felt like they’ve come again to assist us.
A number of years in the past, I used to be near shutting the location down till just a few advertisers got here in and helped the location. And I took a protracted, laborious take a look at what wasn’t working for us. Just like in actual life, we frequently want to chop out poisonous relationships regardless that we could have an affinity for them.
For the location, that poisonous relationship is the artwork world.
Art world: that you must work on your self. It isn’t about Instagram anymore. If you need shoppers who wish to purchase your work, that you must begin making work that generative AI can’t copy. On prime of that, that you must respect your self sufficient to guard your copyrights. This doesn’t imply that you simply ship an organization like CopyTrack in opposition to us telling us to pay to make use of the pictures that you simply gave us permission to make use of — as a substitute it implies that you do it based mostly on the relationships you’ve garnered and labored laborious on over time.
Just give it some thought: all the opposite picture specialty publications don’t concentrate on artwork. Why? Because it’s not sustainable for any of us.
And the artwork world abused the final web site that cared.
The bridge is burned; and I’m not going to be the one to rebuild it for the Phoblographer.
You should be.
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.thephoblographer.com/2025/08/12/an-open-letter-to-the-art-photography-community-from-the-only-publisher-who-consistently-cared/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
