Katrina Kimport, PhD, highlights how abortion bans are resulting in substandard being pregnant care

In a latest interview with Contemporary OB/GYN, Katrina Kimport, PhD, professor within the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health program on the University of California, San Francisco, mentioned her research evaluating the influence of abortion bans and restrictions applied within the wake of the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs) resolution on being pregnant care.

Researchers interviewed clinicians who had handled sufferers affected by these legal guidelines, both in states with strict abortion bans or in states the place abortion stays authorized however obtained sufferers from extra restrictive areas. The research revealed a stark disconnect between what clinicians had been medically educated to do and what they had been legally allowed to do below the brand new restrictions. This hole resulted in sufferers receiving substandard care, resulting in preventable and generally extreme well being penalties.

Kimport outlined 3 key classes of sufferers who had been significantly harmed by these restrictions:

1. Patients with pre-existing medical situations: These people had severe well being points resembling coronary heart illness that had been managed on the time however had been anticipated to worsen with continued being pregnant. Although medical doctors knew that these sufferers would seemingly attain a life-threatening level, the truth that they weren’t in speedy hazard meant clinicians had been legally barred from intervening, resulting in worsening well being outcomes.
2. Patients with pregnancy-related issues: This group included people experiencing situations resembling preeclampsia or preterm untimely rupture of membranes, the place the one efficient remedy is to finish the being pregnant. In each circumstances, ready may end in life-threatening infections or dangerously hypertension, however clinicians had been typically pressured to attend till the affected person’s situation grew to become emergent, by which level the danger of great hurt or dying had enormously elevated.
3. Patients dealing with inevitable fetal or toddler dying: In these conditions, prenatal testing clearly indicated that the fetus wouldn’t survive beginning or would die shortly afterward. Despite this prognosis, clinicians had been unable to intervene as a result of the fetus nonetheless had a detectable heartbeat, which legally prevented any motion except the pregnant individual was additionally in speedy hazard. These legal guidelines pressured people to hold doomed pregnancies to time period, exacerbating emotional and bodily misery.

Overall, the research highlighted how restrictive post-Dobbs abortion legal guidelines have considerably compromised being pregnant care, limiting clinicians’ potential to forestall struggling and shield affected person well being, even in non-elective, medically crucial conditions.

This video is an element 1 of a 2-part collection. Check again tomorrow for half 2.

No related disclosures.

Reference

Kimport Ok, Kaller S. Not actively dying: An inductive categorization of obstetric circumstances negatively affected by post-Dobbs abortion bans. Contraception. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111043