This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://lakingsinsider.com/2026/04/24/d-j-smith-addresses-the-media-between-games-3-4/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us
The LA Kings will return to the ice tomorrow afternoon for a full-team observe day. With two days right here in between video games and a day puck drop on Sunday, the teaching employees opted for a day without work in the present day to get well, a full observe tomorrow after which clearly no morning skate earlier than a 1:30 PM begin time in Game 4.
As anticipated, I believe. Saturday was all the time going to occur, it was only a matter of how the Kings dealt with in the present day. With that call made, Interim Head Coach D.J. Smith spoke in the present day for over 10 minutes, in between Games 3 and 4, along with his staff in a 3-0 sequence gap.
Pulling three selects that I believed had been attention-grabbing, organising what we might doubtlessly count on to see tomorrow, heading into Game 4 on Sunday in Los Angeles.
On if he would take into account adjustments involving the Top-6 to try to enhance offense
Yeah, for positive, I believe you’ve acquired to consider the whole lot, whether or not it’s jumble the highest six, transfer a man up, transfer a man down, however there might be as many as two guys coming in. We’re going to take a look at all prospects to win one recreation and all prospects will come into impact. It’s a house recreation and I get final change, who has performed good at house, who hasn’t performed good at house and it’s to not say that if we win the sport, that I wouldn’t change it once more to what matches the street recreation, as a result of we performed two good street video games there. It’s not nice that we’re down on this scenario, however if you happen to had been down on this scenario and acquired dominated all over you’re sitting right here with lots of questions and that’s not the case. I believe the questions we’re asking is we haven’t discovered a technique to rating sufficient. We’ve defended and checked them actually laborious. We performed actually laborious. We’re enjoying proper with them. Now, we’ve acquired to flip the script and simply win one recreation and see possibly if we could be the staff that’s on the profitable finish of those tight video games.
On not taking benefit and constructing on good moments to grab Game 3
It is [discouraging]. You’ve acquired to win the faceoff. Maybe if we rating on that energy play, make it 2-1 [after Trevor Moore’s goal] we’re speaking a few completely different recreation. Then, we carried the play for the longest time after which Makar scores. You go in after two pondering worst case it needs to be a tie recreation and also you’re down one. Now, you’ve acquired to come back get them. Good groups are good at enjoying with the lead and then you definitely’ve acquired to open it up slightly bit, you’re extra inclined. It’s 2-1, we get an influence play, we quit a shorty, after which we get it proper again after which there we’re once more, 6-on-5 and we don’t get it completed. It’s not a great scenario, trailing to that staff at these explicit instances within the recreation. We get a lead like we had a lead in Game 2, three and a half to go, we’ve acquired to win that recreation. We’ve acquired to have a lead right here at house in considered one of these video games. You’d assume the puck would go in for us and all you are able to do is hold throwing it on the web, getting our bodies there. Give them credit score, although, they’ve completed an excellent job. They’ve completed an excellent job all yr with their objectives towards and the way effectively they play protection.
On his evaluation of the empty-net aim towards
Well, the goalie is out, now we have full possession of the puck and he’s making an attempt to get off and we tried to go fast up, and we simply, for no matter purpose, mishandled it. I believed possibly we might have introduced it again and set it up, however issues occur rapidly. We thought that we might lure them and go on offense. I imply, you’ve acquired full possession of the puck when he’s going to come back out and we had the fellows on that we wished on the ice. There’s nothing you are able to do now. Could now we have talked slightly extra to convey it again and arrange, however then if you happen to convey it again and arrange, they do an actual good job of not giving up the purple line. So, , generally the bounces don’t go your means. It bounced over a stick and it finally ends up proper on their man’s stick and it’s behind the web.
I pulled these three quotes particularly to debate.
The first was attention-grabbing to me, as a result of it’s the primary time actually since D.J. Smith took over that he’s stated that there’s consideration to breaking apart his Top-6. In his first recreation, Quinton Byfield was injured and didn’t play however he has performed each recreation since and I don’t consider there was a change to these traces since that recreation, which got here on March 5.
Now, there may be consideration. The Kings path 3-0 to Colorado and so they have scored one 5-on-5 aim in three video games to date on this sequence. That aim got here from Byfield’s line, with Alex Laferriere and Trevor Moore, which has been the staff’s greatest line at even energy, for positive. So you ask this query. Do you break up one efficient line to doubtlessly enhance the collective, risking shedding what has labored? Or, do you retain what’s working, working and both make adjustments elsewhere to try to bolster the offense or put your chips on getting what hasn’t labored to work because it did within the common season?
I can see each. There’s nothing to lose right here and there’s no Monday with no win on Sunday. So if there are any concepts in there, we must always see them in tomorrow’s observe.
The second I believe was lots of how I seen Game 3 as effectively.
The Kings had moments in video games the place they did good issues after which had the possibility to benefit from them. Down 1-0, the Kings had quite a few alternatives to tie the sport going into the intermission however they couldn’t do it. On the play after they did lastly tie the sport, ahead Trevor Moore was high-sticked whereas driving the web, as he scored, drawing blood on the play. It was a four-minute minor, with half revoked by the aim. The Kings did have two minutes on the ability play however couldn’t convert and at even energy after that, they couldn’t convert there both. It was a chance. But it was a chance missed, in a sequence of alternatives missed throughout three video games.
The third quote I included as a result of it was one other instance of the second. The Kings pulled inside 3-2 with a late power-play aim within the third interval. Panarin shot, Kempe deflection. Simple stuff. With practically 2:30 on the clock, the Kings determined to drag their goaltender however I felt the second was fallacious. Hard to inform the place the largest breakdown was. The Kings had possession within the impartial zone however Anton Forsberg got here to the bench with the puck within the impartial zone, not the offensive zone. The Kings didn’t get it in and Colorado put the puck within the web rapidly and comparatively simply the opposite means. Felt like both a miscommunication or poor recreation administration. Or each. However you shake it, it was a play that may’t occur in that scenario and it was the ultimate nail within the Game 3 coffin.
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://lakingsinsider.com/2026/04/24/d-j-smith-addresses-the-media-between-games-3-4/
and if you wish to take away this text from our web site please contact us

