This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.sharecafe.com.au/2026/08/21/lifestyle-communities-unsuccessful-in-deferred-management-fee-appeal/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
Lifestyle Communities Limited (ASX: LIC) has introduced that it was unsuccessful in its attraction earlier than the Court of Appeal – Supreme Court of Victoria regarding Deferred Management Fees (DMF). The Melbourne-based firm develops, owns, and manages inexpensive unbiased dwelling residential land lease communities, with twenty-nine such communities underneath contract, in planning, in growth, or underneath administration. The Court of Appeal’s determination, acquired at this time, August 21, 2026, upheld the orders made by President Woodward in VCAT on July 25, 2025. These orders associated to the calculation of DMFs based mostly on the resale worth of houses, discovering in opposition to the corporate’s attraction.
This end result means Lifestyle Communities will proceed to function underneath the VCAT ruling from July 2025. As beforehand disclosed, the corporate had already recognised a provision in its Financial Statements for the compensation of DMFs collected from earlier householders who had been impacted by these preliminary VCAT orders. This proactive step aimed to account for potential liabilities arising from the continued authorized problem.
Following the unique VCAT ruling on July 7, 2025, Lifestyle Communities developed its enterprise mannequin to amend the DMF calculation methodology. The firm now bases its Deferred Management Fees on the acquisition worth of a house, pro-rated over a five-year interval to a most of 20% of this worth. This revised methodology is per the July 2025 VCAT ruling and aligns with the lately proposed Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2026, indicating a broader business shift.
Lifestyle Communities acknowledged it might digest the complete particulars of the Court’s determination. The firm additional suggested that it might present an extra replace to the market as required, making certain transparency relating to any additional implications or actions stemming from the judgment.
Post Views: 53
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.sharecafe.com.au/2026/08/21/lifestyle-communities-unsuccessful-in-deferred-management-fee-appeal/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us

