Observer Arts: An Interview With Collector Judy Glickman Lauder

This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://observer.com/2026/08/photography-interview-art-collector-judy-glickman-lauder/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us


Norman Seeff, Robert Mapplethorpe and Patti Smith, New York, 1969. Archival pigment print, 15 x 22 in. Portland Museum of Art, Maine / Promised Gift from the Judy Glickman Lauder Collection, 1.2016.1 / Courtesy the artist

A baby of a photograph fanatic, Judy Glickman Lauder—the widow of billionaire artwork collector Leonard Lauder—has collected images for the reason that Seventies. An exhibition of a part of her assortment is now touring the U.S., that includes some 100 prints by 50 artists, having kicked off this summer time on the Southampton Arts Center in New York. Divided into eight thematic sections and curated by Anjuli Lebowitz, the choice contains work by eminent practitioners like Nan Goldin, Graciela Iturbide, Danny Lyon, Susan Meiselas, Gordon Parks and James Van Der Zee.

Spanning quotidian moments to historic pinnacles, “Presence: The Photography Collection of Judy Glickman Lauder” examines completely different aspects of human vulnerability. The title of the exhibition is in reference to theorist Roland Barthes’ pronouncement: “Every photograph is a certificate of presence.” The exhibition will migrate to the Sarasota Art Museum in Florida in 2026-2027, the Gibbes Museum of Art in South Carolina in 2027 and the Lowe Art Museum in Florida in 2027-2028.

Down the road, Lauder will donate her total assortment to the Portland Museum of Art in Maine. This contains a few of her personal work, for which Lauder traveled to Europe to doc websites associated to the Holocaust as a chilling report of an unthinkable interval. We spoke to the collector, photographer and philanthropist about her household legacy—each she and her dad belonged to the Royal Photographic Society of Great Britain—plus her penchant for Twentieth-century pictures and her work with infrared movie.

Tell me about your trajectory throughout the world of images. You very a lot grew up across the medium.

My father was a health care provider, however his ardour was images. I used to be the topic in entrance of my dad’s massive Graflex digital camera, with the black fabric and the sunshine meters and all that. I used to be at nighttime room as a baby, mesmerized by the magic of it, seeing pictures seem within the developer.

Irving Bennett Ellis, Louise Weinstein Ellis, 1938. Gelatin silver print from a composite destructive, 9 x 7 in. Portland Museum of Art, Maine / Promised Gift from the Judy Glickman Lauder Collection, 11.2006.7

My dad was the president of the Oakland Camera Club, which met in Berkeley; his associates have been Ansel Adams and Edward Weston. They knew about pictures, composition, lovely darkroom papers. He did a business, which is on YouTube; it [won a] Clio within the ’60s. It’s of a kid rising up and changing into an grownup with a baby of her personal; it’s known as the Kodak Turnaround business.

When did your individual observe take type?

I grew to become a photographer a few years later. I used to be born within the late ’30s, I didn’t actually begin studying darkish room [technique] till the ’70s. I’m a mother of 4: I used to be busy taking shade snapshots of each youngster, each commencement, each journey, blah blah blah. In the ’70s, I used to be a docent at UCLA at an artwork museum on campus; I used to be doing a little postgraduate work. I began going to images workshops the place I discovered [to use the] darkish room, and it opened up avenues for my very own artistic expression.

I photographed with Kodak Tri-X, however I additionally labored loads with Kodak high-speed infrared movie, which is not round prefer it was. I used that particularly once I was photographing Holocaust pictures after the very fact in Eastern Europe. I got here within the ’80s, however there have been nonetheless remnants. For three years, I went to camps, railroad tracks, former ghettos, memorials and every thing, and infrared gave it a grainy timelessness, however you by no means know what you’re getting with infrared. I used to be photographing by way of two cameras: one with black and white, and one with infrared. The soul of my work is that Holocaust work.

I used to be requested to go to Denmark within the early ’90s to place collectively an exhibit coping with the Danish rescue of the Jews in October ’43. The Danes have been hiding Jews secretly of their properties, of their warehouses and getting them on boats in the course of the night time. Nothing was documented. Plenty of the rescuers have been youngsters on the time, driving their household’s herring boats at nice threat. I used to be capable of interview survivors, resistance folks, rescuers, they usually took me to all these locations the place it occurred.

Graciela Iturbide, Mujer Ángel (Angel Woman), Sonora Desert, 1980. Gelatin silver print, 16 x 22 3/8 in. Portland Museum of Art, Maine / Promised Gift from the Judy Glickman Lauder Collection, 4.2008.3 / Courtesy the artist

Do you bear in mind the primary photograph that anchored your assortment?

I had moved from Northern California to Southern California; in Los Angeles, there have been two images galleries, G. Ray Hawkins and Stephen White, and I’d see all these pictures, and lots of of them have been reasonably priced as a result of it hadn’t actually caught on as the attractive artwork type that images is. Early pictures that I bought have been by Jerry Uelsmann: three pictures of his spouse. It’s a constructive, a destructive and, I feel, solarization. Very mystical. Another one was by Barbara Morgan, who [photographed] quite a lot of Martha Graham, she did a New York winter park scene superimposing one other destructive of a dancer and a photogram of two white tulips.

I’m drawn to the human presence. I’ve a gorgeous print by Arthur Rothstein. Dorothea Lange. Plenty of pictures are very timeless. Some are decisive-moment pictures. Many by girls photographers: Judy Dater, Cherie Heiser, Margaret Bourke-White. I’ve an exquisite picture of Mick Jagger and Bianca on their marriage ceremony day, Patti Smith with Robert Mapplethorpe and only a complete lot of various rock and roll [figures]. I’m very within the civil rights interval within the United States within the ’50s and ’60s: I’ve quite a lot of pictures from Selma, Birmingham, Montgomery, Atlanta and so forth.

I ended up having a set of 700 pictures, step by step over 50 years. My husband and I have been each on the board of the Portland Museum of Art in Maine, and I gave my assortment to them. It was a chance to see all these pictures as a result of I had no room to hold them. It was the primary time I used to be capable of actually put all of it collectively. Some say it’s type of a “self-portrait” as a result of it tells you somewhat one thing about your self. When I have a look at the gathering, it tells me a bit about completely different segments that I’m drawn to. There’s the injustices, in fact, the civil rights interval. But there’s quite a lot of labor, like Salgado, the gold mines in Africa. I even have Salgado’s work from Kuwait, the folks making an attempt to do away with the fireplace of the oil wells. And I’ve humor: Elliott Erwitt’s humor and Melanie Bennett’s.

I’m nonetheless extra drawn to the Twentieth Century, somewhat than what’s going on at the moment.

Why is that?

I’m not capable of see the timelessness but in a lot of the work that’s being completed at the moment. I grew up in a sure period, and I’m nonetheless drawn to it. I have a look at every thing, however the pictures that I buy appear to be from the ’40s to the ’90s.

You have been saying that your assortment grew to become too massive to show. How did you expertise the gathering in a day-to-day method beforehand? Were you turning over the pictures that you’d exhibit in your house?

I actually didn’t. That takes quite a lot of vitality, quite a lot of time, and I used to be very busy with my very own images. Images that I bought I’d hold for some time, however then I’d simply all the time give them to the museum. I’ve quite a lot of images in my home, however not a lot altering [up] completely different ones. As life went on, I knew that these images would maintain collectively as a set, and I wished a museum to have it.

Melonie Bennett, Suzie, Bahama Beach Club, Portland, Maine, 1996. Gelatin silver print, 16 x 20 in. Portland Museum of Art, Maine / Promised Gift from the Judy Glickman Lauder Collection, 25.2001.1

Do you acquire different types of artwork, or completely images?

Oh, certain. I do have some sculpture and a few work. I like previous issues. I like the treasure hunts and flea markets, thrift outlets, vintage locations. Maine is type of a mecca for that sort of factor.

For the exhibition, it’s 100 images by about 50 photographers. Does it really feel like extra of a highlight on a specific thread, or does it really feel emblematic of the gathering at massive?

It’s a highlight: it’s actually the human spirit. There’s fantastic humor, there’s photojournalism, there’s portraiture such as you wouldn’t consider. Photography is one thing that individuals simply mechanically relate to. Everyone has a cellular phone or digital camera, they know what they’re saying. They don’t should know 18th-century Japanese woodcuts. They see it and growth: it hits them. These have been chosen by Aperture and the Portland Museum of Art curator Angeli Libowitz. At the time, with Chris Boot, who was the director of Aperture, all of us met to resolve what ought to be proven. There’s some ways it may be proven. I’ve 4 [of my own] Holocaust-related pictures, and I’ve one which I took in Istanbul.

Which is the latest {photograph} that you simply’ve bought?

I used to be at AIPAD, and I bought a pair paparazzi images of Jackie O. and Robert Redford—simply candid, fantastic pictures. I’ve enjoyable with celeb. I just lately bought a portrait of Edward Hopper, the painter, in Maine. They’re a bit dearer than they have been within the ’70s, however there are nonetheless treasures, and other people ought to be on the market wanting.

More interviews

Judy Glickman Lauder’s Vast Trove of Photography Is a Portrait of Its Collector


This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://observer.com/2026/08/photography-interview-art-collector-judy-glickman-lauder/
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us