Dyson CameraJet: Telegraph readers react to the brand new 3-in-1 toothbrush

Similarly, reader Paul Isaacs, a dentist, believes that “squirting stuff between teeth isn’t that good at removing a sticky biofilm”.

“If we don’t clean between the teeth properly it’s a bit like only washing your left side in the shower,” he provides.

For Paul, it’s the approach that issues, not essentially the expertise. “Toothbrushes are a personal thing, you can do a great job with manual or electric, if you do it right.”

“Getting bits of peanut out from between the teeth is not effective cleaning when it comes to gum health, so water jets are second rate,” he says.

“The gold standard is mechanical cleaning, in basic terms if you don’t wrangle it off, the biofilm won’t shift.”

The readers tempted by Dyson

These readers, nonetheless, are extra optimistic about this new expertise and might see the way it might grow to be a classy funding, remembering when the electrical toothbrush was dismissed when it first launched.

As a Dyson fanatic, reader Irena Stoynova, 41, from Farnham, was excited to listen to concerning the launch of the CameraJet: “It’s because of the trust I have in the brand.”

As the proprietor of a wide range of Dyson merchandise from the hair dryer, fan and air purifier and vacuum cleaner, Irena has discovered their merchandise to be “innovative, effective and reliable”.

“They are the best in class,” she provides. “I believe that if somebody is going to disrupt the market it is going to be Dyson.”