Photography and the Unreachable Itch of That means

Invisible me hurts. Not all of it, only one elusive spot. We people are cursed with an anatomy that permits us solely 50 per cent visibility of established order. The again is invisible besides to the completed contortionist. Mirrors may assist, however I’ve by no means had a lot time for them. My again, although, is a chatterbox. It broadcasts its opinions vertebra by vertebra and has grown extra opinionated and temperamental with age.

I can reside with that. What I can’t get used to is that one invisible spot. It is just not on my strong, palpable anatomical again. It is on my metaphorical again, the one I see within the thoughts’s eye.

My metaphorical again is the one I see with my thoughts’s eye after I’ve captured a picture in a metaphorical blink.

To hell with metaphors, say you? But a photographer has to depend on them as a result of every part lands on the moment of that metaphorical blink. My digital camera blinks, my eye sees, my mind perceives. You would suppose the job’s executed, however that’s when the difficulty truly commences.

My metaphorical again views what I’ve simply walked previous and begins speaking completely in questions. I can normally reply a few of them. Yes, the sunshine was proper. No, the angle was not skewed. Just wait until I’ve seen the picture, and so forth.

But the again persists with one query that begins off an itch I can’t scratch: Did the picture seize the thought?

What is lacking?

The first picture explains my dilemma. It has each serendipity and intent. The parts are aligned to close Euclidean perfection. The air has a shimmer of chill. The gull, gilded by mild, seduced by stillness, has let its fish escape. The sand, now blood, now gold, now submerged, is earth in all its chancy temperament. The sky hoards tales quickly to be erased by mild. All that is there, all that is serendipity. The intent is within the composition of visible concord. What is lacking?

The Ark, Bukhara, March 2025.
| Photo Credit:
Ishrat Syed

What was I pondering at that immediate? If I can recall that after 4 years, then sure, I get near scratching that elusive spot. If you, the viewer, can see what the picture conceals, then sure, I’ve scratched that itch. If you possibly can odor the effluents within the water, choke on the polluted air, shudder on the mess of cans and cartons on the seashore and fear concerning the gull lacking breakfast, then, and solely then, is the picture full.

The digital camera worries about what I see. I fear about what you see. The picture should stability each anxieties. Marcel Duchamp used the descriptor “retinal” for artwork that’s restricted to the visible picture. The retina is just too treasured to lend itself to a pejorative, however sure, artwork lies past the picture, particularly in {a photograph}.

The Greeks, who’ve a phrase for every part, scoped my dilemma as acnéstis. Literally, the unreachable itchy spot on the knobbly backbone, it quickly grew to become the wonted metaphor for the search that by no means ends. My acnéstis is rarely evident whereas I’m on the job; it begins the second I’m executed and is sore by the point I collect ample braveness to view the picture, at all times a shattering expertise.

Sometimes, although, circumstances collude and fairly with out intention, the picture captures my thought.

Bukhara’s fort, the Ark, in Uzbekistan, is a 2,000-year-old Frank Gehry nightmare. It is a tsunami of brick, and each brick tells a narrative. It has crumbled and has been rebuilt virtually each century. You would suppose its historical past could be blood-soaked and brutal, however such is just not the case.

Yasin, March 2025.
| Photo Credit:
Ishrat Syed

Its reminiscence is filled with tales of wit, of males and, extra curiously, ladies, whose braveness and nous stymied enemies on the threshold. I had learn these tales the earlier evening and was transported to an age the place a joke may halt tyranny and a very good meal win over the enemy.

So once I noticed this platoon of younger males marching across the Ark as if to attract inspiration from its martial may, my coronary heart sank. This was a kathasaritsagara of brick, and I hated to {photograph} it as a navy monument. I had walked round it a number of instances, however nothing, not even the flutter of a mysterious blue scarf at a turret window, allowed me to enter its story.

I had virtually given up, once I met Yasin.

I realized his title a lot later. At first, I walked previous him, stifling a sneer that just about matched his personal.

What was a Bactrian camel doing all dolled up like a Bollywood additional?

The thought stung, and I walked again.

The camel had his eyes educated on the horizon. He wore his ridiculous finery like drag, asserting his apartness. He was faraway, pacing dunes and mountain passes, searching for oases or sheltering from icy winds. His burdens have been many, story not the least of them. All these miles on the Silk Road, weary and overburdened, he had dreamed of house. Now he was house, and residential solely recognised him on this disguise. The camel’s presence remodeled the Ark right into a contour map of his travels. Every brick, a narrative.

Ishrat Syed’s sixth photographic exhibition, “My Silk Road”, was held in March 2026 at Jehangir Art Gallery, Mumbai. He writes as Kalpish Ratna with fellow surgeon Kalpana Swaminathan. Twice in Nalanda, their newest novel, is now in bookshops.

Also Read | Words on a plate

Also Read | Footloose in Ferghana