This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ddr5/single-dimm-ddr5-gaming-works-better-than-you-probably-think-amds-3d-v-cache-chips-drop-less-than-3-percent-one-ddr5-dimm-beats-dual-channel-ddr4-ram
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
There’s been a shift towards utilizing a single DIMM of DDR5 to skirt the worst of the RAM pricing disaster. AMD has recommended to us beforehand, at the very least, that it’s an choice PC builders are exploring, and it’s a wrinkle that’s proven up in dozens of prebuilts; one which we’ve been cautious to keep away from when recommending merchandise, notably throughout peak purchasing occasions. But simply how a lot gaming efficiency are you giving up with a single DIMM when utilizing one of many finest CPUs for gaming?
The standard knowledge is that you just’re giving up fairly a little bit of efficiency, resting on the concepts of earlier DDR generations, the place happening a single stick will reduce your bandwidth in half. The identical is true with DDR5, however issues are a bit messier, which we’ll dig into later.
At a excessive degree, utilizing a single DDR5 DIMM doesn’t compromise gaming efficiency by almost as a lot as you would possibly count on. We noticed drops of round 8% to 10% throughout Intel and AMD CPUs, and fewer than a 5% distinction with AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
Latest Videos FromTom’s Hardware
A correct dual-channel configuration remains to be the best way to go for optimum efficiency. However, our testing reveals that even a single DDR5 DIMM affords superior performance to dual-channel DDR4 on CPUs that support both memory generations.
Using a single DIMM isn’t ideal, and it brings up compatibility issues if you plan on adding another DIMM down the line (another area we’ll touch more on in-depth later). But as a stopgap measure amid surging DRAM prices, a single DIMM of DDR5 holds up surprisingly well in gaming scenarios, and it represents a nice on-ramp into a DDR5 platform while prices are out of control.
Testing single-DIMM DDR5 in games
The geomean below speaks for itself. Moving down to a single DIMM drops some performance, but it’s not nearly as stark as I expected. There are some important notes about how we tested before dissecting the results, however.
As usual, we tested at 1080p with a mixture of High and Ultra settings, using Nvidia’s RTX 5090 Founder’s Edition to minimize the influence of the GPU. That’s even more important here, as we’re not evaluating CPUs but the memory that feeds the CPU. We’re looking at a separate GPU and CPU here, as well; dual-channel memory is vital if you’re using an iGPU.
We also wanted to create a realistic testing scenario. Assuming you’re going for a 2x16GB configuration, that means starting with a single 16GB DIMM, not a 32GB one. That’s what we did here. Our single-DIMM configurations run with just 16GB of memory, while dual-DIMM configurations run with 32GB. Capacity isn’t a major limitation for our testing here, though it will pose performance issues if you’re running several applications alongside your game.
Unsurprisingly, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D fared the best, dropping just 2.8% of its performance on average. As you’ll see through our individual game tests, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D shows identical performance with two DIMMs and a single DIMM in multiple games. The large and speedy L3 minimizes the impact of using a single DIMM, giving AMD’s 3D V-Cache CPUs another notch in their belt (as if they needed another).
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Our other geomeans don’t say much. A single-DIMM configuration consumes a few watts less, leading to slightly lower efficiency when balanced against the lowered performance.
007 First Light, the newest game in our test suite, shows good scaling across our test pool, so it’s a good place to start. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus dropped 8.9% of its performance with a single DIMM, while the 9800X3D dropped 6.5%. The 14600K is worth highlighting here. A single DIMM lost us 7.9%, but that’s still better than dual-channel DDR4, and by a decent 6.8% margin.
This trend is fairly consistent, too. Starfield is punishing for single-DIMM configurations, with the 14600K losing 10.6% of its average performance. Even then, a single DDR5 DIMM is 6.9% faster than dual-channel DDR4. Intel platforms can scale up to high data rates, and we use 7,200 MT/s for Intel chips. With slower speeds, the performance will equalize. Still, I’d strongly consider a single DDR5 DIMM if you’ve been eyeing an LGA 1700 platform with DDR4, assuming you’re primarily focused on gaming.
Starfield shows the benefits of 3D V-Cache in this single-DIMM configuration clearly. While the performance losses with other CPUs are brutal in this title, the 9800X3D dropped just a few frames, a 1.6% decrease in average performance.
Doom: The Dark Ages is similarly harsh on single-DIMM configurations. The Ryzen 5 7600X dropped 17.3% of its average performance, and the 270K Plus fell by 14%. The 9800X3D holds up well, however, with just a 4.2% average performance loss. Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 (in the gallery below) shows a similar dynamic.
However, the addition of 3D V-Cache mainly helps in these games where we see bigger losses with other CPUs. There are several games in our suite where the performance loss between a single DIMM and dual-channel configuration was minor, particularly in GPU-heavy titles. The Last of Us Part One shows that in action.
Similarly, the performance loss is minor in Counter-Strike 2, just a handful of frames even north of 600 FPS. Even the Core i5-14600K, which was hit the hardest by far, dropped just 5.9% of its average performance (and it’s still faster than a dual-channel DDR4 configuration).
You can browse the results of the other games we tested in the gallery above, though they tell much the same story as the titles we highlighted. The two biggest learnings from this testing are that a single, fast DDR5 DIMM often outpaces dual-channel DDR4, and that AMD’s 3D V-Cache can smooth over the rough edges of using a single DIMM, particularly in those memory-sensitive titles.
How we tested
We tested on our normal test bed that we use for CPU reviews, with the only difference being dropping one of our DIMMs. As usual, we enabled XMP/EXPO for testing, both on single- and dual-DIMM configurations, opting for higher speeds on Intel platforms. AMD’s sweet spot is around 6,000 MT/s.
The data rate is noteworthy for the DDR4 comparison, in particular. With slower DDR5, we expect the delta between dual-channel DDR4 and single-DIMM DDR5 to decrease.
In addition to enabling XMP/EXPO, we disable Virtualization-Based Security (VBS), enable Resizeable BAR, and disable any automatic overclocking features that aren’t covered by warranty, including AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive and Intel’s Extreme performance profile.
Complexities of DDR5
DDR5 has much higher data rates compared to DDR4 (2x or more), and that’s the result of significantly more complexity on DDR5 DIMMs compared to DDR4. Notably for this testing are the two 32-bit subchannels of DDR5, as well as enlarged prefetch and bank groups. You are getting half the total bandwidth with a single DDR5 DIMM, absolutely, but it’s a little more nuanced than simply running your memory in a single-channel configuration.
DDR4 uses a single 72-bit channel, and 64 of those bits transfer data (the additional 8 are for ECC). With DDR5, you get two 40-bit subchannels, 32 of which are used for data transfer. Critically, these subchannels have their own Command/Address (CA) interface, allowing them to operate independently of each other.
In addition, DDR5 doubles the prefetch size to 16N, doubles the number of banks and bank groups, and increases burst length from 8 bytes to 16 bytes. The math here is straightforward enough. With DDR4, you can transfer 64 bits of data over the interface at a burst of 8 bytes, giving you 64 bytes of data and aligning with cache line sizes. Each of the subchannels in DDR5 can transfer 64 bytes of data, as well, with a 32-bit width and burst length of 16 bytes.
It’s pseudo-dual-channel memory on a single DIMM. There are two independent memory operations that can happen each cycle, both of which transfer 64 bytes of data. That is a big reason why even a single DDR5 DIMM (particularly one with a higher data rate) can outpace even a proper dual-channel DDR4 configuration.
The common wisdom about using a single DIMM comes mainly from previous DDR generations, where you can only get that single 64-byte transfer each cycle, necessitating a second DIMM to have two independent operations.
Let me be clear: two DDR5 DIMMs are still better. Instead of two operations per cycle, you can perform four. The main difference is that, for modern CPUs and games, just those two operations give you the vast majority of your performance, and you don’t run into a massive performance bottleneck as you do with just a single operation via DDR4. After all, there are still a lot of DDR4 systems out there.
On the issue of compatibility
The elephant in the room with upgrading to a DDR5 platform with a single DIMM is compatibility. If you get a single DDR5 DIMM now, you should plan to add another in the future. Unfortunately, there aren’t a lot of easy answers when it comes to combining two DIMMs that aren’t in a kit together. It should work, but mixing and matching can lead to stability issues and/or lowered performance.
Generally, combining two DIMMs of the same spec should work. For instance, if you bought this Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6000 CL30 DIMM to begin your new construct, after which purchased a second one later, it ought to work. “Should” carries plenty of weight on its shoulders, nevertheless. Maybe Patriot sources DRAM from a number of locations, or your second DIMM’s timings don’t fully align together with your first. That may trigger stability or efficiency points.
There have been some makes an attempt to get previous this hurdle, reminiscent of the ROG Certified program with choose Asus motherboards, but it surely’s inconceivable to know for positive if two separate DIMMs will work collectively or not with out testing. The finest you are able to do is to be sure you purchase the identical model of reminiscence, with the identical spec, should you add a second DIMM. Make positive to maintain your receipt useful within the occasion it is advisable to return it, as nicely.
Once you’ve your second DIMM, ensure to check it first at inventory JEDEC speeds/timings (no XMP/EXPO). Run video games or purposes you usually run, after which use a utility like MemTest64 to examine for stability. I’d advocate retaining your PC operating on this state for a couple of days to see if any BSODs, software crashes, or poor efficiency points pop up. After that’s performed, repeat the method with XMP/EXPO enabled, assuming you’re utilizing matching DIMMs (incompatible XMP/EXPO profiles received’t work collectively).
Assuming DRAM costs proceed at an elevated price earlier than you improve, you might need to contemplate investing in a dual-channel package down the road and promoting your single DIMM. Even kits can run into compatibility points, although the chances are far, far decrease.
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you’ll be able to go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ddr5/single-dimm-ddr5-gaming-works-better-than-you-probably-think-amds-3d-v-cache-chips-drop-less-than-3-percent-one-ddr5-dimm-beats-dual-channel-ddr4-ram
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
