This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you possibly can go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-026-02855-0
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
Cappellari, M. et al. The SAURON challenge – X. The orbital anisotropy of elliptical and lenticular galaxies: revisiting the (V/σ,ϵ) diagram with integral-field stellar kinematics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 379, 418–444 (2007).
Emsellem, E. et al. The ATLAS3D challenge – III. A census of the stellar angular momentum inside the efficient radius of early-type galaxies: unveiling the distribution of quick and gradual rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 888–912 (2011).
Graham, M. T. et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: stellar angular momentum of about 2300 galaxies: unveiling the bimodality of huge galaxy properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 4711–4737 (2018).
Falcón-Barroso, J. et al. The CALIFA view on stellar angular momentum throughout the Hubble sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 632, A59 (2019).
Brough, S. et al. The SAMI Galaxy Survey: mass as the motive force of the kinematic morphology–density relation in clusters. Astrophys. J. 844, 59 (2017).
Veale, M. et al. The MASSIVE survey – VIII. Stellar velocity dispersion profiles and environmental dependence of early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 5446–5467 (2018).
Cole, J. et al. Stellar kinematics and enviornment at z = 0.8 within the LEGA-C Survey: huge gradual rotators are constructed first in overdense environments. Astrophys. J. Lett. 890, L25 (2020).
Derkenne, C. et al. The MAGPI survey: huge gradual rotator inhabitants in place by z ~ 0.3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 4602–4610 (2024).
Muñoz López, C. et al. Stellar angular momentum of intermediate-redshift galaxies in MUSE surveys. Astron. Astrophys. 688, A75 (2024).
Bois, M. et al. The ATLAS3D challenge – VI. Simulations of binary galaxy mergers and the hyperlink with quick rotators, gradual rotators and kinematically distinct cores. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1654–1679 (2011).
Schulze, F. et al. Kinematics of simulated galaxies – I. Connecting dynamical and morphological properties of early-type galaxies at totally different redshifts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 4636–4658 (2018).
Khochfar, S. et al. The ATLAS3D challenge – VIII. Modelling the formation and evolution of quick and gradual rotator early-type galaxies inside ΛCDM. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 845–862 (2011).
Kimmig, L. C. et al. Blowing out the candle: the right way to quench galaxies at excessive redshift—an ensemble of fast starbursts, AGN suggestions, and setting. Astrophys. J. 979, 15 (2025).
Newman, A. B., Belli, S., Ellis, R. S. & Patel, S. G. Resolving quiesent galaxies at z ≳ 2. II. Direct measures of rotational help. Astrophys. J. 862, 126 (2018).
D’Eugenio, F. et al. A quick-rotator post-starburst galaxy quenched by supermassive black-hole suggestions at z = 3. Nat. Astron. 8, 1443–1456 (2024).
Pascalau, R. G. et al. When relics had been made: vigorous stellar rotation and low darkish matter content material within the huge ultra-compact galaxy GS-9209 at z = 4.66. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 547, stag210 (2026).
Jarvis, M. J. et al. The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 1281–1295 (2013).
Forrest, B. et al. The Massive Ancient Galaxies at z > 3 NEar-infrared (MAGAZ3NE) survey: affirmation of extraordinarily fast star formation and quenching timescales for enormous galaxies within the early Universe. Astrophys. J. 903, 47 (2020).
Forrest, B. et al. MAGAZ3NE: excessive stellar velocity dispersions for ultramassive quiescent galaxies at z > 3. Astrophys. J. 938, 109 (2022).
Forrest, B. et al. An extraordinarily huge quiescent galaxy at z = 3.493: proof of insufficiently fast quenching mechanisms in theoretical fashions. Astrophys. J. 890, 1 (2020).
Carnall, A. C. et al. A large quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658. Nature 619, 716–719 (2023).
Glazebrook, Ok. et al. A large galaxy that fashioned its stars at z ~ 11. Nature 628, 277–281 (2024).
Straatman, C. M. S. et al. The sizes of huge quiescent and star-forming galaxies at z ~ 4 with ZFOURGE and CANDELS. Astrophys. J. Lett. 808, L29 (2015).
Rutherford, T. H. et al. The SAMI Galaxy Survey: utilizing tidal streams and shells to hint the dynamical evolution of huge galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 529, 810–830 (2024).
Sola, E. et al. Low floor brightness constructions from annotated deep CFHT pictures: results of the host galaxy’s properties and setting. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 3015–3042 (2025).
Ito, Ok. et al. DeepDive: a deep dive into the physics of the primary huge quiescent galaxies within the Universe. Preprint at (2025).
Heckman, T. M. An optical and radio survey of the nuclei of shiny galaxies – exercise in regular galactic nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 87, 152–164 (1980).
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 93, 5–19 (1981).
Agostino, C. J., Salim, S., Ellison, S. L., Bickley, R. W. & Faber, S. M. A brand new bodily image for energetic galactic nuclei missing optical emission traces. Astrophys. J. 943, 174 (2023).
Cappellari, M. Full spectrum becoming with photometry in pPXF: stellar inhabitants versus dynamical lots, non-parametric star formation historical past and metallicity for 3200 LEGA-C galaxies at redshift z ~ 0.8. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 3273–3300 (2023).
Harborne, Ok. E. et al. Recovering λR and V/σ from seeing-dominated IFS information. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 2018–2038 (2020).
Hubble, E. Extra-galactic nebulae. Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory 324, 321–369 (1926).
Turner, O. J. et al. The KMOS Deep Survey (KDS) – I. Dynamical measurements of typical star-forming galaxies at z ~ 3.5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 1280–1320 (2017).
Méndez-Abreu, J., Simonneau, E., Aguerri, J. A. L. & Corsini, E. M. Structural properties of disk galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 521, A71 (2010).
Bellovary, J. M. et al. Effects of inclination on measuring velocity dispersion and implications for black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2667–2676 (2014).
Slob, M. et al. Fast rotators at cosmic midday: stellar kinematics for 15 quiescent galaxies from JWST-SUSPENSE. Astron. Astrophys. 702, A110 (2025).
van Dokkum, P. G. et al. The progress of huge galaxies since z = 2. Astrophys. J. 709, 1018–1041 (2010).
Naab, T. et al. The ATLAS3D challenge – XXV. Two-dimensional kinematic evaluation of simulated galaxies and the cosmological origin of quick and gradual rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3357–3387 (2014).
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J. & Kereš, D. A cosmological framework for the co evolution of quasars, supermassive black holes, and elliptical galaxies. I. Galaxy mergers and quasar exercise. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 175, 356–389 (2008).
van Dokkum, P., Conroy, C., Villaume, A., Brodie, J. & Romanowsky, A. J. The stellar preliminary mass operate in early-type galaxies from absorption line spectroscopy. III. Radial gradients. Astrophys. J. 841, 68 (2017).
La Barbera, F. et al. IMF radial gradients in most huge early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 4090–4110 (2019).
Karademir, G. S. et al. The outer stellar halos of galaxies: how radial merger mass deposition, shells, and streams rely upon infall-orbit configurations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 318–332 (2019).
Bezanson, R. et al. The relation between compact, quiescent high-redshift galaxies and big close by elliptical galaxies: proof for hierarchical, inside-out progress. Astrophys. J. 697, 1290–1298 (2009).
Saracco, P. et al. The fast buildup of huge early-type galaxies: supersolar metallicity, excessive velocity dispersion, and younger age for an early-type galaxy at z = 3.35. Astrophys. J. 905, 40 (2020).
Suess, Ok. A. et al. Minor merger progress in motion: JWST detects faint blue companions round huge quiescent galaxies at 0.5 < z < 3.0. Astrophys. J. Lett. 956, L42 (2023).
Nipoti, C. Evolution of huge quiescent galaxies by way of envelope accretion. Astron. Astrophys. 697, A74 (2025).
Forbes, D. Assembly pathways and the expansion of huge early-type galaxies. Galaxies 5, 27 (2017).
van de Sande, J. et al. the Sami Galaxy Survey: revisiting galaxy classification by way of high-order stellar kinematics. Astrophys. J. 835, 104 (2017).
Penoyre, Z., Moster, B. P., Sijacki, D. & Genel, S. The origin and evolution of quick and gradual rotators within the Illustris simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 3883–3906 (2017).
Lagos, C. D. P. et al. Angular momentum evolution of galaxies in EAGLE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 3850–3870 (2017).
Böker, T. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope: III. Integral-field spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys. 661, A82 (2022).
Valentino, F. et al. An atlas of color-selected quiescent galaxies at z > 3 in public JWST fields. Astrophys. J. 947, 20 (2023).
Cappellari, M. Improving the complete spectrum becoming methodology: correct convolution with Gauss–Hermite capabilities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 798–811 (2017).
Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B. & Falcón-Barroso, J. UV-extended E-MILES stellar inhabitants fashions: younger elements in huge early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 3409–3436 (2016).
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E. & White, M. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar inhabitants synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of unsure facets of stellar evolution and the preliminary mass operate to the derived bodily properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486–506 (2009).
Conroy, C. & Gunn, J. E. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar inhabitants synthesis modeling. III. Model calibration, comparability, and analysis. Astrophys. J. 712, 833–857 (2010).
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar inhabitants synthesis on the decision of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).
Verro, Ok. et al. The X-shooter Spectral Library (XSL): Data Release 3. Astron. Astrophys. 660, 1–26 (2022).
Schreiber, C. et al. Jekyll & Hyde: quiescence and excessive obscuration in a pair of huge galaxies 1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang. Astron. Astrophys. 611, A22 (2018).
Cappellari, M. & Copin, Y. Adaptive spatial binning of integral-field spectroscopic information utilizing Voronoi tessellations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 342, 345–354 (2003).
Pasha, I. & Miller, T. B. pysersic: a Python package deal for figuring out galaxy structural properties by way of Bayesian inference, accelerated with jax. J. Open Source Softw. 8, 1–5 (2023).
Bentz, M. C. The NIRSpec IFU level unfold operate. Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc. 9, 128 (2025).
Cleri, N. J. et al. Optical sturdy line ratios can not distinguish between stellar populations and accreting black holes at excessive ionization parameters and low metallicities. Astrophys. J. 994, 146 (2025).
Belli, S. et al. KMOS 3D reveals low-level star formation exercise in huge quiescent galaxies at 0.7 < z < 2.7. Astrophys. J. 841, 6 (2017).
Kriek, M. et al. The heavy steel survey: star formation constraints and dynamical lots of 21 huge quiescent galaxies at z = 1.3–2.3. Astrophys. J. 966, 36 (2024).
Bugiani, L. et al. Active galactic nucleus suggestions in quiescent galaxies at cosmic midday traced by ionized fuel emission. Astrophys. J. 981, 25 (2025).
Chang, W. et al. MAGAZ3NE: Dust deficiency in ultramassive quiescent galaxies at 3
Jarvis, M. et al. The MeerKAT International GHz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey. Proc. Sci. 277, 006 (2018).
Hale, C. L. et al. MIGHTEE: the continuum survey Data Release 1. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 536, 2187–2211 (2025).
Rossum, G. Python Tutorial Technical Report CS-R9526 (Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 1995).
The Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M. et al. The Astropy Project: sustaining and rising a community-oriented open-source challenge and the newest main launch (v5.0) of the core package deal. Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics setting. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: elementary algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A. & Trevena, J. Theoretical modeling of starburst galaxies. Astrophys. J. 556, 121–140 (2001).
Kauffmann, G. et al. The host galaxies of energetic galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346, 1055–1077 (2003).
Cappellari, M. Structure and kinematics of early-type galaxies from integral discipline spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 597–665 (2016).
van de Sande, J. et al. The SAMI galaxy survey: a statistical method to an optimum classification of stellar kinematics in galaxy surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 3078–3106 (2021).
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its authentic location you possibly can go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-026-02855-0
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
