This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-026-03140-1
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
Woodward, P. J., Kennedy, A. & Sohaey, R. Diagnostic Imaging: Obstetrics 4th edn (Elsevier, 2021).
Hutter, D., Kingdom, J. & Jaeggi, E. Causes and mechanisms of intrauterine hypoxia and its influence on the fetal cardiovascular system: a evaluation. Int. J. Pediatr. 2010, 401323 (2010).
Berkley, E., Chauhan, S. P. & Abuhamad, A. Doppler evaluation of the fetus with intrauterine development restriction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206, 300–308 (2012).
Nelson, Okay. B. & Grether, J. Okay. Causes of cerebral palsy. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 11, 487–491 (1999).
McClure, E. et al. Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research: possible causes of stillbirth in low- and middle-income international locations utilizing a prospectively outlined classification system. BJOG 125, 131–138 (2018).
Smith, G. C. S. & Fretts, R. C. Stillbirth. Lancet 370, 1715–1725 (2007).
Lawn, J. E. et al. Stillbirths: charges, danger components, and acceleration in the direction of 2030. Lancet 387, 587–603 (2016).
Rouse, D. J. Antepartum fetal surveillance ACOG follow bulletin, quantity 229. Obstet. Gynecol. 137, E116–E127 (2021).
Rouse, D. J., Owen, J., Goldenberg, R. L. & Cliver, S. P. Determinants of the optimum time in gestation to provoke antenatal fetal testing: a decision-analytic strategy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173, 1357–1363 (1995).
Harkey, Okay. T., Casale, M. B., Pantelopoulos, A. A. & Zurcher, M. A. Assessing the scientific use of a novel, cell fetal monitoring system. Obstet. Gynecol. 123, 55S (2014).
Ryu, D. et al. Comprehensive being pregnant monitoring with a community of wi-fi, smooth, and versatile sensors in high- and low-resource well being settings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100466118 (2021).
Freeman, R. Okay. Problems with intrapartum fetal coronary heart charge monitoring interpretation and affected person administration. Obstet. Gynecol. 100, 813–826 (2002).
Grivell, R. M., Alfirevic, Z., Gyte, G. M. & Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal evaluation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9, CD007863 (2015).
Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D., Gyte, G. M. & Cuthbert, A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a type of digital fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal evaluation throughout labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD006066 (2017).
Marzbanrad, F., Stroux, L. & Clifford, G. D. Cardiotocography and past: a evaluation of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound utility in fetal monitoring. Physiol. Meas. 39, 08TR01 (2018).
Hayes-Gill, B. R. Monica Healthcare: from the analysis laboratory to industrial actuality—a real-life case examine. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 8, 1–10 (2021).
Gunther, J. E., Jayet, B., Sekar, S. Okay. V., Kainerstorfer, J. M. & Andersson-Engels, S. Review of optical strategies for fetal monitoring in utero. J. Biophotonics 15, e202100343 (2022).
Du, Y.-C., Yen, L. B., Kuo, P.-L. & Tsai, P.-Y. A wearable system for analysis of relative place, drive, and length of fetal motion for pregnant girl care. IEEE Sens. J. 21, 19341–19350 (2021).
Nicolaides, Okay., Rizzo, G., Hecher, Okay. & Ximenes, R. Doppler in Obstetrics (The Fetal Medicine Foundation, 2002).
Salomon, L. J. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound evaluation of fetal biometry and development. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 53, 715–723 (2019).
Bhide, A. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (up to date): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 58, 331–339 (2021).
Oros, D. et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal center cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 53, 454–464 (2019).
Drukker, L. et al. International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal potential cohort examine of the INTERGROWTH-Twenty first Project. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 222, 602.e1–602.e15 (2020).
Kiserud, T. et al. The World Health Organization fetal development charts: a multinational longitudinal examine of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLOS Med. 14, e1002220 (2017).
Papageorghiou, A. T. et al. International requirements for fetal development primarily based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal development longitudinal examine of the INTERGROWTH-Twenty first Project. Lancet 384, 869–879 (2014).
Goldenberg, R. L., Harrison, M. S. & McClure, E. M. Stillbirths: the hidden start asphyxia—US and world views. Clin. Perinatol. 43, 439–453 (2016).
AIUM follow parameter for the efficiency of ordinary diagnostic obstetric ultrasound. J. Ultrasound Med. 43, E20–E32 (2024).
Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term steady imaging of various organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).
Hu, H. et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature 613, 667–675 (2023).
Du, W. et al. Conformable ultrasound breast patch for deep tissue scanning and imaging. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh5325 (2023).
Zhang, L. et al. A conformable phased-array ultrasound patch for bladder quantity monitoring. Nat. Electron. 7, 77–90 (2023).
Khalil, A. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: efficiency of third-trimester obstetric ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 131–147 (2024).
Hoskins, P. R., Martin, Okay. & Thrush, A. (eds) Diagnostic Ultrasound Physics and Equipment (CRC Press, 2019).
Evans, D. H., Jensen, J. A. & Nielsen, M. B. Ultrasonic color Doppler imaging. Interface Focus 1, 490–502 (2011).
Zhang, L., Du, W., Kim, J.-H., Yu, C.-C. & Dagdeviren, C. An rising period: conformable ultrasound electronics. Adv. Mater. 36, e2307664 (2024).
Aksoy, B. et al. Shielded smooth drive sensors. Nat. Commun. 13, 4649 (2022).
Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. IPEM Report 102—Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Imaging Systems. (IPEM, 2010).
Thijssen, J. M., van Wijk, M. C. & Cuypers, M. H. M. Performance testing of medical echo/Doppler tools. Eur. J. Ultrasound 15, 151–164 (2002).
Browne, J. E. A evaluation of Doppler ultrasound high quality assurance protocols and check gadgets. Physica Medica 30, 742–751 (2014).
Ter Haar, G. (ed.) The Safe Use of Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis (The British Institute of Radiology, 2012).
AIUM official assertion for advisable most scanning occasions for displayed thermal index values. J. Ultrasound Med. 42, E74–E75 (2023).
Safety Group of the British Medical Ultrasound Society. Guidelines for the Safe Use of Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. (BMUS, 2010).
Food and Drug Administration. Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Report No. FDA-2017-D-5372 (FDA, 2023).
Hekkenberg, R. T. & Bezemer, R. A. Aspects Concerning the Measurement of Surface Temperature of Ultrasonic Diagnostic Transducers, Part 2: On a Human and Artificial Tissue. (TNO Preventie en Gezondheid, 2003).
International Electrotechnical Commission. Ultrasonics: Field Characterization—Test Methods for the Determination of Thermal and Mechanical Indices Related to Medical Diagnostic Ultrasonic Fields. Report No. IEC 62359:2010/AMD1:2017 (IEC, 2017).
Maulik, D. & Lees, C. C. (eds) Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Springer, 2023).
Conde-Agudelo, A., Villar, J., Kennedy, S. H. & Papageorghiou, A. T. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for hostile perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal development restriction: systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 52, 430–441 (2018).
Hadlock, F. P., Harrist, R. B., Sharman, R. S., Deter, R. L. & Park, S. Okay. Estimation of fetal weight with using head, physique, and femur measurements—a potential examine. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 151, 333–337 (1985).
Zhou, S. et al. Transcranial volumetric imaging utilizing a conformal ultrasound patch. Nature 629, 810–818 (2024).
Oates, C. Ultrasound Technology for Clinical Practitioners (Wiley, 2023).
Ali, S. et al. Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for hostile perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income international locations: a scientific evaluation. BMJ Open 11, e049799 (2021).
Ali, S. et al. Standardization and high quality management of Doppler and fetal biometric ultrasound measurements in low-income setting. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 61, 481–487 (2023).
Demi, L. Practical information to ultrasound beam forming: beam sample and picture reconstruction evaluation. Appl. Sci. 8, 1544 (2018).
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical picture segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W. M. & Frangi, A. F.) (Springer, 2015).
Shi, X. et al. Convolutional LSTM community: a machine studying strategy for precipitation nowcasting. In Proceedings of the twenty ninth International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Cortes, C., Lee, D. D., Sugiyama, M. & Garnett, R.) (ACM, 2015).
Alfirevic, Z., Stampalija, T. & Dowswell, T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD007529 (2017).
Lees, C. C. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: prognosis and administration of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal development restriction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 56, 298–312 (2020).
Sotiriadis, A. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: function of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 53, 7–22 (2019).
Vogel, J. P. et al. The world epidemiology of preterm start. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 52, 3–12 (2018).
Gardosi, J., Madurasinghe, V., Williams, M., Malik, A. & Francis, A. Maternal and fetal danger components for stillbirth: inhabitants primarily based examine. BMJ 346, f108 (2013).
Freeman, R. Okay., Garite, T. J., Nageotte, M. P. & Miller, L. A. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring 4th edn (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012).
Pildner Von Steinburg, S. et al. What is the ‘normal’ fetal coronary heart charge? PeerJ 1, e82 (2013).
Chang, L. W., Hsu, Okay. H. & Li, P. C. Graphics processing unit-based high-frame-rate shade doppler ultrasound processing. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56, 1856–1860 (2009).
So, H., Chen, J., Yiu, B. & Yu, A. Medical ultrasound imaging: to GPU or to not GPU? IEEE Micro 31, 54–65 (2011).
Lee, W. et al. Universal meeting of liquid metallic particles in polymers permits elastic printed circuit board. Science 378, 637–641 (2022).
You, I. et al. Artificial multimodal receptors primarily based on ion leisure dynamics. Science 370, 961–965 (2020).
Wang, S. et al. Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array. Nature 555, 83–88 (2018).
Son, D. et al. Multifunctional wearable gadgets for prognosis and remedy of motion problems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 397–404 (2014).
Liu, Z. et al. A 3-dimensionally architected digital pores and skin mimicking human mechanosensation. Science 384, 987–994 (2024).
Lin, M. et al. A totally built-in wearable ultrasound system to observe deep tissues in shifting topics. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 448–457 (2024).
Skow, R. J. et al. Effects of prenatal train on fetal coronary heart charge, umbilical and uterine blood circulate: a scientific evaluation and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 53, 124–133 (2019).
Georgieva, A., Abry, P., Nunes, I. & Frasch, M. G. Editorial: Fetal–maternal monitoring within the age of synthetic intelligence and computer-aided resolution help: a multidisciplinary perspective. Front. Pediatr. 10, 2296–2360 (2022).
Huang, Z. et al. Three-dimensional built-in stretchable electronics. Nat. Electron. 1, 473–480 (2018).
Kempski, Okay. M., Graham, M. T., Gubbi, M. R., Palmer, T. & Lediju Bell, M. A. Application of the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio to evaluate photoacoustic picture high quality. Biomed. Opt. Express 11, 3684–3698 (2020).
Wear, Okay. A. & Shah, A. Nominal versus precise spatial decision: comparability of directivity and frequency-dependent efficient delicate component measurement for membrane, needle, capsule, and fiber-optic hydrophones. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 70, 112–119 (2023).
Harris, G. R. et al. Hydrophone measurements for biomedical ultrasound purposes: a evaluation. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 70, 85–100 (2023).
Wear, Okay. A., Gammell, P. M., Maruvada, S., Liu, Y. & Harris, G. R. Improved measurement of acoustic output utilizing advanced deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61, 62–75 (2014).
Wear, Okay. A. Hydrophone spatial averaging correction for acoustic publicity measurements from arrays—half I: principle and influence on diagnostic security indexes. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 68, 358–375 (2021).
Szabo, T. L. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2014).
International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 2–37: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Ultrasonic Medical Diagnostic and Monitoring Equipment. Report No. IEC 60601-2-37:2024 (IEC, 2024).
Kennedy, A. M. & Woodward, P. J. A radiologist’s information to the efficiency and interpretation of obstetric Doppler US. Radiographics 39, 893–910 (2019).
This web page was created programmatically, to learn the article in its unique location you may go to the hyperlink bellow:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-026-03140-1
and if you wish to take away this text from our website please contact us
